Illini Football 2026

Status
Not open for further replies.
#479      
Perhaps. It seems to have been talked about that the OL is bigger than last year.

It's not. It's longer and more athletic, but the OL is not bigger.

Martin weights less than Davis, same with Getsky ^ Matelau; Henderson 25' ^ Henderson 26 and Priestly ^ Knapik.

Only Renfro is bigger than Kreutz.

Most seem to be leaner. That's team wide. Jordan Anderson was close to being unrecognizable (in a good way). He's still a good sized RB but would be tiny for a TE.
Henderson is down 15 pounds on program weight from 2025 to 2026. Martin, Matalau, Knapik are all going to be signficantly more athletic then who they replaced.

I'll never forget what Lunney ran in 2021 with UTSA....they ran wide zone to death against the Illini, put that DL on skates, very side to side....he really hasn't been able to do that here.

They tried to at the start of 2025 and it looked horrendous and they stopped.

I think he was given some significant say this past portal season on what he wants to see on the OL, for the first time.
 
#480      
I have a strong belief that the offense that faces Ohio State will be much improved over the past few years. The non-conference games will be the testing ground, for the O line especially. I don't expect to look like a BCS contender in the non-conference.
 
#482      
I have a strong belief that the offense that faces Ohio State will be much improved over the past few years. The non-conference games will be the testing ground, for the O line especially. I don't expect to look like a BCS contender in the non-conference.

Lunney is gonna keep it pure vanilla in non-con. hoping we can shock them early and keep it up through 4

FWLIW, I'm buying the Houser hype and think our O line is gonna surprise
 
#486      
Henderson is down 15 pounds on program weight from 2025 to 2026. Martin, Matalau, Knapik are all going to be signficantly more athletic then who they replaced.

I'll never forget what Lunney ran in 2021 with UTSA....they ran wide zone to death against the Illini, put that DL on skates, very side to side....he really hasn't been able to do that here.

They tried to at the start of 2025 and it looked horrendous and they stopped.

I think he was given some significant say this past portal season on what he wants to see on the OL, for the first time.
Perhaps oddly, this is the type of post that gets me thinking we rip off 9-10 wins this season.
 
#487      
Last years oline was fat and slow. Gesky dropped 30lbs for the nfl. This years line is long and athletic
Yep, I'm just surprised it hasn't been talked about. I first noticed the OL recruits we were after were no longer Hunter Whitenack clones but more athletic. I thought, good, finally.

Yet it wasn't being talked about??. Rather it was being mentioned the OL was bigger?? That wasn't computing so Saturday watching it was fairly obvious, this group is longer and leaner.

You and Geneva have both confirmed it, thanks.
 
#488      
Another notice - all 4 QB's really seemed comfortable running the O on Saturday. More than I expected given the lack of experience with this offense.

I'm guessing some of that was just plain jane vanilla play calls most everyone runs given the practice was semi-open.

But also, only 4 QB's on the roster this year and Illinois has as many QB coaches as ever. I think that helps as well.

Even Eisenmenger was not quite Clayton but still looked solid and was getting quality reps. I like that pick up. With all of the portal QB chaos, he could ultimately earn the #2 spot and be there for quite a few years. Like an NFL #2 that you never know when your number gets called.
 
#489      
Yep, I'm just surprised it hasn't been talked about. I first noticed the OL recruits we were after were no longer Hunter Whitenack clones but more athletic. I thought, good, finally.

Yet it wasn't being talked about??. Rather it was being mentioned the OL was bigger?? That wasn't computing so Saturday watching it was fairly obvious, this group is longer and leaner.

You and Geneva have both confirmed it, thanks.
The Wisconsin OLs that were really good…were huge….but could also move very well.

Haliman looks that way. Champ smith looks that way. Pritchard looks that way. Fifer they are going to have to work on, he’s a little top heavy and will need to change his body. Von seggeren looks that way.

Matalau looks extremely quick. Martin pretty athletic. Knapik long and athletic.

I’d love to know what’s behind the shift. It’s very welcome in my eyes.

I think Lunney was finally given control.
 
#490      
The Wisconsin OLs that were really good…were huge….but could also move very well.

Haliman looks that way. Champ smith looks that way. Pritchard looks that way. Fifer they are going to have to work on, he’s a little top heavy and will need to change his body. Von seggeren looks that way.

Matalau looks extremely quick. Martin pretty athletic. Knapik long and athletic.

I’d love to know what’s behind the shift. It’s very welcome in my eyes.

I think Lunney was finally given control.


In my opinion, and this is not with any inside knowledge but rather my own perspective...

They inherited a good starting OL with minimal depth. They were good athletes as Lovie seemed to focus on measurables a lot in recruiting (Hence why those DBs were all 4.4-4.5 guys, etc.), and they also grew into their frames with B1G experience. Combine that with good coaching+development and they had a nice foundation to start with initially with some future NFL players/starters.

Once those guys were gone/nearing their eligibility they still had to sell the program which was still behind in success in terms of winning. They lost some key battles in that and had to maybe overreach on certain guys (Erring on the side of size and potential over athleticism). They also lost a few guys but still were able to bring in Adams, Davis, Preistly, etc. which helped them.

Now that they have more success to sell (Partly due to the players inherited from the previous staff), they've gone some prospects that look like future day one/day two picks (Smith, Matelau, etc.). Those players are not only huge, but very nimble and athletic for their size with all the measurable you see in those top of the draft OL. They should only continue to get better with the caliber of OL they're getting now and they'll be able to get with more continued success.

I was already in the camp that this will be their best OL in this regime so far. They have the chance to be the best offense in program history IMO.

And I also remember that UTSA Lunney offense (From the Illini game and that season overall). I think it'll little closer to that with Boyd next year but this should be an equally explosive and efficient offense. I'm excited to see it.
 
#491      
Yep, I'm just surprised it hasn't been talked about. I first noticed the OL recruits we were after were no longer Hunter Whitenack clones but more athletic. I thought, good, finally.

Yet it wasn't being talked about??. Rather it was being mentioned the OL was bigger?? That wasn't computing so Saturday watching it was fairly obvious, this group is longer and leaner.

You and Geneva have both confirmed it, thanks.

It never made sense we recruited offensive linemen that didn’t fit the scheme. I’m just happy we aren’t recruiting big fat linemen with slow feet.
 
#492      
I have a strong belief that the offense that faces Ohio State will be much improved over the past few years. The non-conference games will be the testing ground, for the O line especially. I don't expect to look like a BCS contender in the non-conference.


Yeah they have the athletes and OL to match up with OSU. One thing people need to pay attention to is the defense hung with them for the better part of that game last year.

With the secondary back healthy now, that's a big boost. Juice Clarke held J.Smith to what was maybe his worst game statistically (A game many overlook if you're looking for a potential 'Spoon type of jump). They have the athletes at DB to hold their receivers in check. Should be an interesting game.
 
#494      
So, looking down the road a bit, after this season, which DB do you think will go higher in the draft - Bailey, X Scott, or Clarke?



Kind of leaning Clarke if he continues to progress. He looks like he has added more strength when I was watching the training camp preview and I don't think people talk enough about how he basically shut down maybe the best WR in CFB last year.

Scott offers versatility and should be a lock to go round 3-4 or higher assuming he stays healthy. His playmaking ability at NICKEL raises his stock but he is a good CB when lined up outside as well.

Bailey I believe is going to possibly be the most decorated in college as this defense could make him a household name this season. He's a real enforcer. If a team like Seattle who has a similar type of scheme drafts him he'll continue to play that CHIEF type of role. Otherwise I think he'll more than likely project at LB in the pros which raises his stock even more IMO.

For right now I'll say Clarke with all going in the 3-5 round range at the moment. Lots of potential to move up for all three though.

If Clarke shuts down Smith again and some of these other elite B1G WR you'll see him rise big time. It kind of puts me in the mind of Spoon because you could see it coming when he was clamping up future NFL WR in Jarrett from Maryland, etc. the previous year. That type of rise is almost unheard in terms of obscurity but I could see Clarke making a big jump with progression. Interested to see Morris and how he fits in. There's good buzz and I liked the tape a lot.

However, I think Hankins Jr. is the best NFL prospect at DB (And one of the top overall on the team). I could see him on freshman AA teams this year and possibly a B1G team (HM, etc.).
 
Last edited:
#496      
So, looking down the road a bit, after this season, which DB do you think will go higher in the draft - Bailey, X Scott, or Clarke?

Will* go higher? Xavier
Could* go highest? Clarke
Most likely to be undrafted? Also Clarke

I'm guessing Bailey's shoulders are extensively checked out in the draft prep phase, but he would have the highest floor for a professional career if he is not given a medical red flag.
 
#497      
Will* go higher? Xavier
Could* go highest? Clarke
Most likely to be undrafted? Also Clarke

I'm guessing Bailey's shoulders are extensively checked out in the draft prep phase, but he would have the highest floor for a professional career if he is not given a medical red flag.
Bailey will have the best stats of all 3 (assuming full health).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back