No one is disputing that the decade before Ayo the Illini were down — way down. And no one is disputing that Ayo was the player whose decision to attend the UI sparked the current revival. At odds are Ayo’s place in the overall pantheon of Illinois basketball — “the house that Ayo built.”
Paralleling your argument, people forget just how down Illinois was between the 89 Flying Illini team and Lon Kruger’s renaissance. By comparison, the trio of Sergio McClain, Marcus Griffin and, most importantly, Frank Williams choosing the Illini was the “Ayo moment” of that period. Two decades before that, Derek Harper was the Ayo of the day. History doesn’t necessarily repeat itself, but it sure rhymes.
Finally, it’s very short sighted to say that Henson rebuilding the brand in the 80s didn’t help us get where we are today. That’s like saying your existence has nothing to do with your great-great grandfather getting it on with your great-great grandmother. I have no idea where we’d be now if not for Henson — good or bad — but where we are right now is most certainly the offshoot of his 20 year efforts.