Illinois 48, Southern Illinois 10 Postgame

#51      
I was thinking BEFORE the game yesterday that what Bielema's Wisconsin teams were famous for were road grader offensive linemen and bull-rushing running backs. We've really had neither in his tenure here...until yesterday. I loved Chase Brown, but he was a darter, not a pounder.

The linemen are still MIA but Javari Barnett (6'1" 235) sure looked promising. I LOVE the way he runs and think he needs to have 15-20 carries each game. Pounding the rock will further establish the running game, use up the clock and keep our feeble defense off the field. It may be old school, but it's the way that the upper echelon of teams still win.

Now to find those road-graders....
Watch the absolute explosion in his legs when he runs. None of our current RB's run like that. They're all slashers. Barnett needs to be the tough yardage guy.
 
#52      
Here’s the key with the JB love (and this is 100% typed with the same enthusiasm y’all have after seeing him run yesterday):

1. It was SIU’s backups, who he should definitely be able to run over.
2. Can he pass block yet? If not, he will be a “it’s a run” tipoff to the D every time he comes in.

#1 doesn’t concern me as much. He may not be able to trample the soul of a tOSU DB like he did the SIU kid on the last play…but that sort of tenacious running is a state of mind and will help him at least find ways to fall forward.

#2 is an unknown in live game reps and if he whiffs and Houser gets crushed, he’ll restrict our offensive playcalling options.
 
#55      
Overall decent game. I have concerns about the linebackers in pass coverage lots of wide open 8 yards gains. I also think the 2 minute offense is a work in progress. They were able to sneak in a field goal at the end of be half, but that was after sputtering out on the previous drive.
 
#58      
For context Laughery has had 10 carries once in 3 games, Valentine has had 11 and 18. Even if Barnett is a lot more involved there just don't seem to be enough available carries to get 10-12 consistently.
unless he can average 6-7 yards per carry

we need to find that guy who can average 85-100 yards per game. Brets preferred & traditional game plan includes a team rushing attack that eats clock by averaging 200 yds per game
 
Last edited:
#59      
Overall decent game. I have concerns about the linebackers in pass coverage lots of wide open 8 yards gains. I also think the 2 minute offense is a work in progress. They were able to sneak in a field goal at the end of be half, but that was after sputtering out on the previous drive.
This. The ol' "We'll give 'em a free 7 to 8 yards every pass play" defense was back yesterday. Frustrating. Overall, the tackling did seem better. Lower level team, I get it, but it was still a definite improvement.
 
#60      
10-12 is plenty. I would like to see the backs get involved in the passing game.
That’s the aspect of the offense that it seems Lunney shies away from and I’m not sure why. Having the RB as either a safety valve or calling some designed HB screens is something I feel has been very absent from our offense the past few years and would help immensely in relieving pressure on Luke and now Houser. Plus getting Valentine and Laughery in space with blockers set up seems like what we should be doing. Not doing this is probably the biggest aspect of Lunney’s play calling that I just don’t understand.
 
#61      
That’s the aspect of the offense that it seems Lunney shies away from and I’m not sure why. Having the RB as either a safety valve or calling some designed HB screens is something I feel has been very absent from our offense the past few years and would help immensely in relieving pressure on Luke and now Houser. Plus getting Valentine and Laughery in space with blockers set up seems like what we should be doing. Not doing this is probably the biggest aspect of Lunney’s play calling that I just don’t understand.

Hit valentine on the wheel route or just find ways to get him in space. I do think it’s hurt is not having a big back to wear down the defense.
 
Back