To build on the point you’re making, I think a strong case can be made that this team is the most disciplined and system-driven group of any team listed above, rivaling the 2005 team. One of the key reasons championship teams in recent years tend to have experience and continuity is because this has helped build disciplined systems. Systems only work when players fully commit to them.Yeah, that 2021 team could look dominant (I still think the stretch to end the regular season through the BTT Championship might have been the single best streak of basketball by any Illini team in history ... at least for now!), but they seemed to have a more sever Achilles' Heel compared to this year's team. As crazy as this is in retrospect, I actually initially thought the 2022 team could end up going further in the Tournament due to the simplified game plan of "If you try to double team Kofi, we'll kill you from three ... if you don't, Kofi will terrorize you." You can tell I am no Xs and Os expert, lol, but the point is that the 2021 team looked AMAZING when things were going well, but the Loyola performance is one of the most disappointing in a long time. While you shouldn't judge a team by one game, that loss was sort of a depressing microcosm of what could happen if you game planned them effectively.
This year's team is so versatile. Yes, Wagler is our superstar and carries us in a lot of games, but we have had so many guys step up. Granted this is just looking at offense, but it's interesting to look at the scoring balance for what are pretty clearly our five best teams of this century. To choose a cutoff somewhere, I will do the top 8 scorers.
2001 | 77.9 PPG
14.9 Frank Williams
11.3 Marcus Griffin
11.2 Brian Cook
9.9 Cory Bradford
7.5 Sergio McClain
7.2 Robert Archibald
5.7 Sean Harrington
5.0 Lucas Johnson
2005 | 77.0 PPG
15.9 Luther Head
13.3 Dee Brown
12.5 Deron Williams
12.0 Roger Powell, Jr.
10.1 James Augustine
4.5 Jack Ingram
3.3 Nick Smith
2.6 Rich McBride
2021 | 80.5 PPG
20.1 Ayo Dosunmu
17.1 Kofi Cockburn
10.2 Trent Frazier
9.1 Andre Curbelo
8.3 Adam Miller
5.5 Da'Monte Williams
5.1 Giorgi Bezhanishvili
4.6 Jacob Grandison
2024 | 83.4 PPG
23.0 Terrence Shannon, Jr.
15.9 Marcus Domask
12.1 Coleman Hawkins
9.6 Quincy Guerrier
6.2 Ty Rodgers
6.1 Dain Dainja
5.7 Luke Goode
5.6 Justin Harmon
2026 | 84.6 PPG
18.1 Keaton Wagler
14.3 Kylan Boswell
13.3 Andrej Stojakovic
12.4 David Mirkovic
10.1 Tomislav Ivisic
7.2 Zvonimir Ivisic
5.5 Ben Humrichous
5.1 Jake Davis
2005 and 2026 are the only teams with five players averaging double figures. It is also the case for both teams that the next three players who are not averaging double figures (A) could knock down huge shots and (B) played very well alongside the higher-scorers ... and frankly, the "supporting cast" of the 2026 team is much more dangerous from three and more able to have huge games themselves.
Brad and staff have clearly built and developed an extremely disciplined roster, and that shows up in several notable stat parallels to the 2005 team:
Turnovers - This year’s turnover rate sits at 14.1%, the lowest of any Illinois team this century. The 2005 team turned it over at 16.5%, while even the better Groce teams (2015 and 2016) were only around 15%. Most seasons typically fall in the 18–20% range. This level of ball security shows this team's discipline and decision-making.
Tempo and shot selection - This team plays at the second-slowest tempo among the teams mentioned, averaging roughly 65.6 possessions per game, compared to 64.1 for the 2005 team. Nearly every other team operates closer to 70 possessions. Like the 2005 group, this team is comfortable playing slowly because it is consistently generating the right shots for the right players.
Offensive rebounding as a system pillar (edit: not necessarily a similarity to 2005)- The ability to play this slow is directly tied to elite offensive rebounding. Every player on the floor is fully bought into attacking the offensive glass, and it has become the team’s secret sauce. This may be the strongest evidence of discipline, as it clearly required retraining players to commit to a demanding, team-wide philosophy that only works with total buy-in.
Shot quality on both ends - Finally, as a bit of a cherry on top, average 2-point attempt distance further highlights this team’s discipline. While it’s a newly tracked stat, this team is elite at only taking close twos offensively, while also forcing opponents into longer twos defensively.
Last edited: