Illinois 66, Purdue 58 Postgame

#176      
Sloppy game but hey in the B10, I'll take it. I actually liked the fact that AYO didn't have his best game and other players stepped up. One thing I noticed is how they tend to go long stretches where they stop going inside to Kofi, even the announcers committed on it last night. IMO he should be touch the ball on every offensive possession if possible. Feed the big man!
 
#177      

Deleted member 8896

D
Guest
I didn't focus on everyone's free throw shooting but just look at Kofi's. He'll shoot short the first time. Next up he's long and bricks it on the back of the hoop. Maybe the next is left (legit miss) and then long again. I wonder if he's changing his target and his eyes focus on different parts of the rim for each shot. I mean, are we sure Kofi does not need eyeglasses? His shot doesn't look that bad. It's gotta be either focus or vision. We always taught to focus on the exact same part of the rim for each and every shot. Every shot is exactly the same. Dribble twice, breathe, look up, focus on point, put it up, follow through, repeat. Do that 1000 times every day for two weeks, and you should see some improvement. If you couldn't shoot over 80% from the line in games then you couldn't play (and everyone was tracked on a board - daily FT practice and in game stats). And you have to practice FT's AFTER practice. I think after practice and FT's, we ran wind sprints and suicides; when you were done with those coach picked one person to shoot two FT's and if they missed either shot then you started over with sprints and suicides. Make your FT's ladies.
You can shoot two thousand free throws a day but if you dont have the right form all you are doing is reinforcing bad habits to muscle memory. Reference Shaq! What you are saying is fine, but proper arch, elbow position, holding the follow thru, etc, etc, has to be taught also. I don’t think this staff has the ability to do that. Just because you are a good coach, or were a good player yourself doesn’t mean you can coach shooting free throws. Does anyone really know who is in charge of that on the staff?
 
#178      
I saw a video last summer of Stephen Gentry breaking down our offense, and he said they coach our screeners to roll to the rim before making contact with the on-ball defender. I’m not enough of a basketball junkie to fully understand why that is. But I think that even without contact, the ball handler is often able to turn the corner and get his shoulders in front of the on-ball defender, and a quick roll forces the big defender into a tough choice in whether to stop penetration or stay with the roll-man. I’d be interested in hearing more from someone who knows what they’re talking about (unlike me).

From what I know this is a Mike Dantoni thing. The idea is it forces the defender to go over the screen so the ball handler already has an angle and now his defender is trailing. The quick roll forces the screeners man to make an early decision to stop the ball or the roll. Because the ball handlers man is trailing he’s kind of out of the play and then your playing a man up (2 on 1 if you’re only looking at the pico and roll, 3 on 2 if you’re looking at the help and kick option as well).
 
#179      
I think these two things can be and are both true:

1. This is a good team that can, when at its best, beat anyone

2. They did not play their best game

Purdue may well be a good team, but they played sloppy too, which was lucky for us. They shot 39% from the field and turned the ball over 14 times. A chunk of this was our defense, for sure, but a lot of it was just Purdue playing badly.

We had a bad day, and found a way to win. That's not necessarily a bad thing. Every team has their off days, and I think finding a way to stay focused and pull out the win on days like that is an important skill. Let's just not kid ourselves into thinking this was a good performance.
 
#180      
I think these two things can be and are both true:

1. This is a good team that can, when at its best, beat anyone

2. They did not play their best game

Purdue may well be a good team, but they played sloppy too, which was lucky for us. They shot 39% from the field and turned the ball over 14 times. A chunk of this was our defense, for sure, but a lot of it was just Purdue playing badly.

We had a bad day, and found a way to win. That's not necessarily a bad thing. Every team has their off days, and I think finding a way to stay focused and pull out the win on days like that is an important skill. Let's just not kid ourselves into thinking this was a good performance.C
Correct, being able to win when you are not your best wins championships.
 
#181      
Last year, Kofi started the year pretty shaky on FTs and then went on a terror of like 29/30 or something crazy for a big man that ... my numbers could be way off, but it was some crazy streak and then he cools back down to what we’d reasonably hope for and finished the year with a respectable ft percentage.

I’m guessing he’s short more this year at this crappy percentage than he did last year to start, but maybe it is something small that will click and he’ll come back around.
 
#182      
I thought DMW and Trent were seniors. Can they get another year of eligibility because of COVID or something? Given we only have one guy in our recruiting class, retaining them would be nice if it is viabble.
Yes all players get a free year this year if they want it
 
#183      
I see Curbelos role similar to James Harden back when he was on OKC. KD/Westbrook go to the bench, and then offense revolves around harden. It works well for Illini.
 
#188      
Actually I think I understand the method to the madness. Let the starting 5 tire out the opponents so when Curbelo and his burst of energy gets in, winded starters will be trying to keep up with him. If Curbelo started, I don’t think his replacement can come off the bench and lead or change the game like he does.
Underwood has to balance personnel on the court, not only at one time but over the length of the game.
 
#189      
Purdue wasn’t above their average. Let’s not pretend they played good. They shot 39% for the game (IL was 48%)and 7/12 from the line and had 14 turnovers.

We played down to their level. This was another Ohio game at home. If we played an upper level Big 10 team this would have been a loss. When you get up 10+ in the 1st half against a bad team at home, you can’t let them back in the game with your own mistakes. I think we are a good team that has some inexplicable stretches of bad play.

This isn't a Monday morning quarterback assessment of the stat at the end of the game. You have to look at matters at a point in time not factoring in a reduced percentage due to poor shot selection in the final 3 minutes because you're trying to come back. Starting the second half, they scored on the first 8 possessions. That's 100%. They had players that were 29% shooters, shooting above their average from a distance. College basketball is a game of runs. The point was, even with our poor play, we still won comfortably.
 
#190      
I am not sure that Ayo had a bad night. He had 12 in the first half when they built a lead, then I think that he just sat back and let the other guys find their way in this one. I noticed that he passed out of several good scoring opportunities. Being ill might explain that but don't think that was the case.
Like Kofi said, he can take over a game when he wants to. Don't think he wanted to in the second half. If you (Ayo) want to win a championship with 3 freshmen in the rotation, you need them to develop. Think he understands that they won't develop if he carries them all the time.
 
#191      
I am not sure that Ayo had a bad night. He had 12 in the first half when they built a lead, then I think that he just sat back and let the other guys find their way in this one. I noticed that he passed out of several good scoring opportunities. Being ill might explain that but don't think that was the case.
Like Kofi said, he can take over a game when he wants to. Don't think he wanted to in the second half. If you (Ayo) want to win a championship with 3 freshmen in the rotation, you need them to develop. Think he understands that they won't develop if he carries them all the time.
Believe Ayo is about winning not stuffing the stats. Also true of DaMonte, Trent, etc. Frosh are learning to play defense, that also doesn’t show up in the stats but is required to win.
 
#192      
Underwood has to balance personnel on the court, not only at one time but over the length of the game.
This^^^^^
It isn’t as simple as just starting Curbelo over Miller and the former getting a few more minutes. Who is the main ball handler on the “second unit” and who is supplying that spark off the bench? And then there is the whole defensive side to it. I want the best team on the floor the last 5-7 minutes of the half and the game —while maximizing offensive and defensive performance the other minutes of the game. Does starting Curbelo help combat slow starts? Maybe. But do those bad stretches just get moved to a different part of the game? Possibly at times when tougher to change the momentum or comeback from? And most importantly for me because of new substitution patterns does it make it more “difficult” to end half and game with 5 you want? And none of this takes into consideration Curbelo not having an issue with coming off the bench. Sure some of that falls under “what did you expect him to say,” but I do think a player as smart as Curbelo understands what he is bringing off the bench and how coming off the bench can help his game.
 
#193      
This is probably a goofy opinion, but I think the first five minutes of the first half are the least important five minutes of the game.
 
#195      

Deleted member 747840

D
Guest
Could start miller for game and Curbelo 2nd half? Could depend on 1sr half mins/fouls.
Eh sure, call it a half measure :). I really dont get the point of not playing your 5 best players if you can. I do understand having sparks off the bench, but it's been extremely clear Curbelo is at least the 4th best player on this team.

On the other hand, while I think our slow starts are concerning, why break a rotation that clearly isnt broken? Maybe I'd like another 4/5 mins per game out of Belo, but I imagine he's one of the first off the court anyways if he was to start.
 
#196      
Eh sure, call it a half measure :). I really dont get the point of not playing your 5 best players if you can. I do understand having sparks off the bench, but it's been extremely clear Curbelo is at least the 4th best player on this team.

On the other hand, while I think our slow starts are concerning, why break a rotation that clearly isnt broken? Maybe I'd like another 4/5 mins per game out of Belo, but I imagine he's one of the first off the court anyways if he was to start.
I think Underwood always wants to have at least one of Ayo and Curbelo in the game at all times. If you start them together, you increase the risk of having to sit them both at the same time. They could both get in foul trouble. One could be in foul trouble while the other needs a rest. Etc.

By staggering their minutes at the start of each half, you can manage foul trouble and other issues to keep at least one of them on the court. If neither is in foul trouble, you can play them together more during the last ten minutes of each half.