Illinois 73, Michigan State 70 POSTGAME

#226      

kcib8130

Parts Unknown
I'm not talking about recruits. Players interests refers to your active players ("his players"), not recruits. This kid was in Groce's first class, a great representative of the school, fully healthy, played in 119 games here, and the point i was responding to was about being a players coach, keeping his players interests in mind, etc. In this instance, he did not. We're talking about any amount of seconds that is non-zero here. Thorne may be injured still, so that one's fine, but IMO it was super bogus to not get JT even one short tick on senior night.

On the recruit point, you don't think recruits watching MSU's senior night didn't appreciate Izzo getting Harris in the game? That was a monumental gesture. And even if they didn't see it live, that clip circulated pretty quick, because it matters.

I think that players understand the notion that everything has to be done in the interest of winning games, which we absolutely have to do from here on out. This isnt HS, you dont have to play seniors just because. I'm not sure there is a drastic difference between how it went down and playing 2 minutes in the middle of the first half (for example).

The Eron Harris situation really has me really conflicted. I get he wanted to get in the game one more time, but he was a transfer and only played two seasons there. I thought it was a bit much to go out and kiss the court and all that. But that is strictly my opinion, and not really evident of anything. (Plus totally off the topic)
 
#228      
Maybe we should have scheduled a cupcake for senior night instead of a good team and it wouldn't have been an issue. =P
 
#229      
That's fine, folks can disagree with me, but I felt it was a gesture that should've been made. I strongly disagree that 30 seconds of Tate would've tanked our chances of winning that game. I'll take this stance alone.

But regardless, the original point stands that the "players interest" argument in favor of Groce doesn't hold up in its entirety for multiple reasons.

Perhaps Tate wouldn't have wanted to go in for 30 seconds. What does 30 seconds do for his career here? It might have been more insulting than honoring. Why not Thorne, then, too? Austin has been here for three years and played a lot of minutes last year. Why not him, also?

The game last night meant too much to the program to mess around. 30 seconds of Tate may not have changed a thing, but I still don't think it was necessary.
 
#230      

kcib8130

Parts Unknown
That's fine, folks can disagree with me, but I felt it was a gesture that should've been made. I strongly disagree that 30 seconds of Tate would've tanked our chances of winning that game. I'll take this stance alone.

But regardless, the original point stands that the "players interest" argument in favor of Groce doesn't hold up in its entirety for multiple reasons.

I don't have any issue with your stance, i just think its completely wrong to say "JG isn't a player's coach" with nothing to base it off except your opinion of what you think he should have done.

Doesn't prove that, and I would bet that most of the players would disagree with you. Mostly through their play in the last two and a half weeks.
 
#231      
That's fine, folks can disagree with me, but I felt it was a gesture that should've been made. I strongly disagree that 30 seconds of Tate would've tanked our chances of winning that game. I'll take this stance alone.

Problem is, sometimes you can go a few minutes without being able to sub (unless of course you take a timeout, which now you're compromising not only a possession or two but also losing a TO that could be used in a critical point.)

I would've like to see every senior step on the floor, but the fact of the matter is this was an important and close game. We won by 3 pts. Can't risk losing by playing a kid just because he's a senior. We needed every off/def possesion that went our way to go our way (if that makes sense), and Tate/Thorne/Austin would've all been liabilities to hurt a possession here or there. OK done with the dead horse beating.

I'm sure those guys are disappointed but this isn't house league. You play the best players in the situation, regardless of standing. Tate knows this and should be happy the team won.
 
#232      
In Div 1 College ball, you absolutely have to play to win at this time of the season, even on "Senior" night. As a coach, I hate this night because there are always unreal expectations from players and parents. Maybe we should consider doing what I am planning to start doing and make it earlier in season when there are still cupcakes on the schedule. This allows even SR walkons to get in game
 
#233      

mhuml32

Cincinnati, OH
I'm not talking about recruits. Players interests refers to your active players ("his players"), not recruits. This kid was in Groce's first class, a great representative of the school, fully healthy, played in 119 games here, and the point i was responding to was about being a players coach, keeping his players interests in mind, etc. In this instance, he did not. We're talking about any amount of seconds that is non-zero here. Thorne may be injured still, so that one's fine, but IMO it was super bogus to not get JT even one short tick on senior night.

On the recruit point, you don't think recruits watching MSU's senior night didn't appreciate Izzo getting Harris in the game? That was a monumental gesture. And even if they didn't see it live, that clip circulated pretty quick, because it matters.


Can't compare the MSU situation, as that was very different than the current situation with Tate.
 
#235      
On Tate/Thorne not playing:
That game was way too close to warrant freebie time to Tate and Thorne. I would've like it, but the game went down to the wire and any moves like that would be slammed by most. Especially if they ended up losing.

Groce made the right call.
 
#236      

whovous

Washington, DC
On Tate/Thorne not playing:
That game was way too close to warrant freebie time to Tate and Thorne. I would've like it, but the game went down to the wire and any moves like that would be slammed by most. Especially if they ended up losing.

Groce made the right call.

Thorne is a very large shadow of his former self, so putting him in would entail serious risk. My preference was to start Tate at the 2 in place of TA and then pull him at the first stoppage of play. His defense is fine and TJL could still bring the ball up.

That said, I don't really disagree with you. Groce made the right call.
 
#237      
Anybody notice that MSU waited until the ball got in Lucas' hands for the intentional foul in the last minute. I'm afraid with TJL being a 58% FT shooter we are going to see more of that.
 
#238      

Deleted member 29907

D
Guest
I think that players understand the notion that everything has to be done in the interest of winning games, which we absolutely have to do from here on out. This isnt HS, you dont have to play seniors just because. I'm not sure there is a drastic difference between how it went down and playing 2 minutes in the middle of the first half (for example).

The Eron Harris situation really has me really conflicted. I get he wanted to get in the game one more time, but he was a transfer and only played two seasons there. I thought it was a bit much to go out and kiss the court and all that. But that is strictly my opinion, and not really evident of anything. (Plus totally off the topic)

Agree. I think MH crying because we won has much more of an impact on recruits that seeing JT in for 2 token minutes. This was a 3 point game. And from the start we could not afford to take one possession off. If anything, we've been hard on Groce because he's been too nice. I think JW got to him and let him know 'nice' won't keep your job - quit spreading out the PT. This is not HS.
 
#239      

Deleted member 29907

D
Guest
Anybody notice that MSU waited until the ball got in Lucas' hands for the intentional foul in the last minute. I'm afraid with TJL being a 58% FT shooter we are going to see more of that.

Saw that and it was very obvious. With TA and JCL as options - we have alternatives to receive that pass. JG did that in another recent game where TJL was the receiver of the inbounds pass on an obvious foul situation. Would hope he now knows. They did let TA dribble a bit on the last play into Morgan before giving it to TA.
 
#240      

Bailey

Los Angeles
Saw that and it was very obvious. With TA and JCL as options - we have alternatives to receive that pass. JG did that in another recent game where TJL was the receiver of the inbounds pass on an obvious foul situation. Would hope he now knows. They did let TA dribble a bit on the last play into Morgan before giving it to TA.

TJL and Finke looked shaky in those final couple minutes. Hopefully they become conditioned with more high-pressure situations in the near future.
 
#241      
Anybody notice that MSU waited until the ball got in Lucas' hands for the intentional foul in the last minute. I'm afraid with TJL being a 58% FT shooter we are going to see more of that.

Rick Barry style underhand freethrows should become an Illini trademark. When IL is the top freethrow shooting team in the nation (a likely consequence), the perceived stigma should go away quickly.
 
#242      
Rick Barry style underhand freethrows should become an Illini trademark. When IL is the top freethrow shooting team in the nation (a likely consequence), the perceived stigma should go away quickly.

No joke, I shoot my free throws underhand and make close to 90 percent. I'm not a bad shooter in general - it's just flat out more efficient.

For those curious, my game is a combination of flashy ball handling, 25-foot pull-ups, ambidextrous old man post moves, and Rick Berry free throws. I'm pretty good and not actually fat (though I could stand to drop ten pounds or so before summer). I don't know if this information is disappointing, but there you have it.
 
#243      
No joke, I shoot my free throws underhand and make close to 90 percent. I'm not a bad shooter in general - it's just flat out more efficient.

For those curious, my game is a combination of flashy ball handling, 25-foot pull-ups, ambidextrous old man post moves, and Rick Berry free throws. I'm pretty good and not actually fat (though I could stand to drop ten pounds or so before summer). I don't know if this information is disappointing, but there you have it.

We have our PG :eek:
 
#244      
It would straight-up revolutionize his game and make him a matchup nightmare for most teams. Somebody who can post and rebound like a man as well as shoot from beyond the arc? Yikes.

Like Swannigan?
 
#245      

Deleted member 29907

D
Guest
TJL and Finke looked shaky in those final couple minutes. Hopefully they become conditioned with more high-pressure situations in the near future.

True. Games like this last one will help with the nerves. TJL is a bit nervous at the line in crunch time. Regardless of FT nerves - TJL does not back down though. I liked the way he blocked that shot after he fouled and the whistle had already blown.
 
#246      
For those who are wondering about Abram's turnaround toward the end of the season, I think it correlates with Lucas taking over the starting point guard job. It took pressure off of Tracy and enabled him not to play as many minutes. He doesn't have all that responsibility of being the team's "engine" and can just concentrate on his shot. He slots in better coming off the bench. What do you guys think?

I agree. I think his usage rate has been far too high for his ability, so when he hit the slump he just killed our team efficiency. I'm not trying to knock him, but IMO he was forcing far too much, and just wasted possessions in games that were close. During conference play he has the lowest efficiency rating of the regular rotation which just means that statistically not enough good things happen when he is in, and I think that's because he was forcing things.

I very much appreciate that he seems to be picking his spots now, and isn't attempting to drive to the basket. If he keeps playing within his abilities I think we have a much much higher ceiling because he can be a real asset.
And here is the excerpt on PER just so it doesn't seem like I'm bashing him; it's just what the numbers show.

"The PER sums up all a player's positive accomplishments, subtracts the negative accomplishments, and returns a per-minute rating of a player's performance."
http://www.basketball-reference.com/about/per.html
http://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/schools/illinois/2017.html
 
#247      

Illiniwek06

N of I-80
Regardless of FT nerves - TJL does not back down though. I liked the way he blocked that shot after he fouled and the whistle had already blown.

His defense where he stripped Bridges driving with 5 seconds left to keep a two point lead was awesome. Instead of describing his play in an inappropriate way, I'll let Sam demonstrate my thoughts:

giphy.gif
 
#248      
Anybody notice that MSU waited until the ball got in Lucas' hands for the intentional foul in the last minute. I'm afraid with TJL being a 58% FT shooter we are going to see more of that.

I'm not making a comparison in terms of talent, but Deron Williams shot 53.3% from the FT line as a freshman. Lucas was a good FT shooter in college, his percentage will rise as he gets more experience