RML is right. One problem last season definitely was that we shot more 3s than we should (to optimize our scoring based on our end-of-game percentages). This occurred in about 80% of our games last season. From what I could tell, had we only taken the types of shots (just 2s or just 3s) for which we scored the highest (on a pts per possession basis), we would have won 12 of the 13 games that we lost. (BTW, normally, our better shots, on this basis, were 2s, not 3s.)
Or, if that analysis to too complicated for you, we basically stunk at 3s (30.8% on the season), yet we jacked them up more than any other big ten team.
BTW, we shot way too many 3s (based on our end-of-game percentages) against Ottawa, not enough against KU, and too many against EIU. So, Underwood has not fully fixed this problem this season (despite having some better shooters on the roster). But Underwood putting Rogers at point does help, since Rogers virtually never shoots a 3 himself, and Rogers good drives to the rim/paint should help remind his teammates that they need to do that too (especially when their 3s aren't going in), so I really like Rogers at the point. It makes us a more consistent team, a better road team, and a better defensive team.