Illinois 86, Wisconsin 80 Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#152      
Ben’s been the highest graded defender on the team in 6 games….Brads not just making that up
I'm not being critical of Ben here. Generally, I think people are just frustrated he's missing shots right now (that happened to Plummer early on, too).

But just to be clear, we aren't talking about grading high in standard, publicly available advanced metrics, right? It's more like Ben is assignment sound, executes the defense the way Brad asks him to, always in the right place, no mental lapses sort of thing?
 
#154      
Ben’s been the highest graded defender on the team in 6 games….Brads not just making that up
Not disputing that at all. And I totally appreciate that he has internal stats that obviously have served him and his teams well. He has earned the benefit of the doubt given his success at every stop. I can't speak for everyone who is questioning Ben's minutes, but I (and I believe there are many others) am just going by the eye test and some of the advanced stats from Torvik, Evan Miya et al. that would indicate Will's and Morez's statistical value is higher than Ben's at the current point in the season. I think I can speak for all true Illini fans that we value and support Ben as an Illini and hope he gets out of his offensive slump as soon as possible. If he is a threat to stretch the defense from deep, we are a much more dangerous team. And I know you know that already.
 
#155      
We all saw it last night - Having this version of Tre makes Illinois better. Duh. Having Tre cutting and moving thru the lane means fewer jacked 3s. Would love to see some minutes with both Tre and Will in the game.
 
#159      
I guess I'm struggling to understand what the analytics are saying that my eyes are missing. I'm a finance guy, and I'm a BIG fan of and believer in data. When you have the right data and use it the right way, you make more rational and less emotional decisions. All else equal, data is a very good thing. But if the analytics are really saying Humrichous really was the best-performing defender the last several games, I question the validity of those analytics. I just don't see it when you have someone like Boswell who is absolutely locking good players down while Humrichous is in the middle of a lot of defensive breakdowns. I get basketball is a team game and 1v1 defending isn't the full story, but it's hard to reconcile what I'm watching with the commentary that Humrichous is analytically the team's best defender.

It would be like me spending half of my day looking at a bank balance that's really low and vendors screaming at me for the company to pay its bills while the company is showing very high profitability. Something just doesn't add up.
 
#161      
Ahhh the YMCA coaches are out tonight!
Nah, they aren't quite up to that lofty standard. Think 5yo youth basketball coach 😂

1733929779050.gif
 
#162      
Reffing was some of the worst I’ve seen in recent memory. Luckily it didn’t cost us, but it was rough to watch. Announcers agreeing with that position is telling as well.
 
#164      
I don't see anyone doing that at all. And I don't believe anyone is being "impatient" with Ben. Only wondering why he is currently receiving the significant majority of minutes over other guys who seem to be able to positively impact the game. It's more than fair for fans to debate playing time. It happens in every sport, at every level.
Agree.

You don’t have to be a coach to observe a player’s struggles. You don’t have to be a player to observe bad coaching decisions.

Seems this game had plenty of both but we pulled it off.

I just don’t understand how coach can just tell Ben to get more rebounds when he’s clearly struggling just to get the free throw rebounds. Reminded me of the time coach continued to put freshman Damonte Williams to inbound the ball during critical times in a game. We lost at least one, maybe two because of that.
 
#166      
Ben’s been the highest graded defender on the team in 6 games….Brads not just making that up
His problem is rebounding. Brad even said it.

His other problem is making shots. Brad said it in a positive way.
 
#167      
I guess I'm struggling to understand what the analytics are saying that my eyes are missing. I'm a finance guy, and I'm a BIG fan of and believer in data. When you have the right data and use it the right way, you make more rational and less emotional decisions. All else equal, data is a very good thing. But if the analytics are really saying Humrichous really was the best-performing defender the last several games, I question the validity of those analytics. I just don't see it when you have someone like Boswell who is absolutely locking good players down while Humrichous is in the middle of a lot of defensive breakdowns. I get basketball is a team game and 1v1 defending isn't the full story, but it's hard to reconcile what I'm watching with the commentary that Humrichous is analytically the team's best defender.

It would be like me spending half of my day looking at a bank balance that's really low and vendors screaming at me for the company to pay its bills while the company is showing very high profitability. Something just doesn't add up.

That most of our eyes aren't as reliable as we think they are. At least, not as reliable as a D1 coaching staff who has a cumulative 75-100 years or so of experience doing this at this level.
 
#172      
I have a question that I know the coaches won't see, or answer, so I'll ask here.

It seems that we routinely get blown by with the 1st step and it's happened since Brad got here A LOT! Is this part of our defensive scheme? Are we slow? Are we suseptible to jab steps? I feel my basketball IQ is pretty high, but it blows my mind.

I bet we got smoked 15+ times last night by slow guys from Wisconsin and Northwestern the last 2 games.
I always assumed this was a feature of our scheme. We don't want to give up 3s, so we are funneling opponents to the basket and meeting them there with a shot blocker to force midrange 2s.
 
#175      
I guess I'm struggling to understand what the analytics are saying that my eyes are missing. I'm a finance guy, and I'm a BIG fan of and believer in data. When you have the right data and use it the right way, you make more rational and less emotional decisions. All else equal, data is a very good thing. But if the analytics are really saying Humrichous really was the best-performing defender the last several games, I question the validity of those analytics. I just don't see it when you have someone like Boswell who is absolutely locking good players down while Humrichous is in the middle of a lot of defensive breakdowns. I get basketball is a team game and 1v1 defending isn't the full story, but it's hard to reconcile what I'm watching with the commentary that Humrichous is analytically the team's best defender.

It would be like me spending half of my day looking at a bank balance that's really low and vendors screaming at me for the company to pay its bills while the company is showing very high profitability. Something just doesn't add up.

Hes in the middle of breakdowns but they aren't his breakdowns, he just gets left holding the hot potato at the end of it. He's not a disruptive defender but he's sound.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back