While we're comparing completely different players, anyone want to talk about how much better a dunker Dain Dainja is than Jaylon Tate?
cool beans...................Haha all good Pru it’s an epic shot
Congratulations TEAM! You have earned a huge celebration. Relax a couple days and back to work. A NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP would live FOREVER.
Love watching the Danja Zone in action!What a basketball game!! LFG!!
Dain Dainja didn’t fill the stat sheet today but he absolutely changed the entire makeup of that game. He was monumental on both ends in 2H.
And there’s nothing else to say about TSJ. Best 3 game stretch I’ve ever seen an Illini play.
Agree, and the assist to turnover rate for the type of offense we run is inherently low. The real question about this entire argument is what are the other options for this team's ball handler if not Marcus Domask? All in all, it is likely the best option to have MD with the ball a large majority of the time. And, it certainly seems to be working considering we have one of the most efficient offenses in country.He is an elite ballhandler. You're really doing some kind of dance to pretend otherwise.
Talking about assists (has zero to do with ballhandling ability).
Comparing him to Kolek who has a similar usage rate but a much, much higher turnover rate. You then in your next sentence start talking about Domask's passing ability versus Kolek's passing ability. That has zilch to do with the argument.
You call it 'weird' and 'pretending' that Domask is a strong ballhandler even though the numbers that dictate that viewpoint align with it entirely, but then drone on about 'asissts' which have nothing to do with dribbling the basketball... I think that's 'weird' lol
I think it's probably cause they want to get shannon some rest but I'd be perfectly fine letting Shannon bring the ball down the court a bit and just immediately attack in the high pnr.Agree, and the assist to turnover rate for the type of offense we run is inherently low. The real question about this entire argument is what are the other options for this team's ball handler if not Marcus Domask? All in all, it is likely the best option to have MD with the ball a large majority of the time. And, it certainly seems to be working considering we have one of the most efficient offenses in country.
CBS's coverage is a joke. How many times do they keep the camara focused on a player or a coach as the ball is in play, finally picking up the game as ball crosses half court.
Ahhh, makes way more sense. I attended the rally in '05, so that's why my brain connected the dots.2001, I was assuming.
my man, are you purposely misreading? He is stating Kolek’s turnovers come from passing. Most PG’s you compare to MD will have their TO’s due to passing because they do not turn the ball over from handling it nearly as much as MD does. Most of MD’s turnovers are due to a lack of ball handling. Saying “usage vs TO rate shows he’s a good ball handler” isn’t an accurate statement simply because most PG’s are getting their turnovers from passing, not from lack of handles like MD. There is a reason why our points per possession goes up when we’re full court pressed instead of one guy guarding MD bringing the ball up, and that’s because it means we pass the ball more to get it up the court.He is an elite ballhandler. You're really doing some kind of dance to pretend otherwise.
Talking about assists (has zero to do with ballhandling ability).
Comparing him to Kolek who has a similar usage rate but a much, much higher turnover rate. You then in your next sentence start talking about Domask's passing ability versus Kolek's passing ability. That has zilch to do with the argument.
You call it 'weird' and 'pretending' that Domask is a strong ballhandler even though the numbers that dictate that viewpoint align with it entirely, but then drone on about 'asissts' which have nothing to do with dribbling the basketball... I think that's 'weird' lol
And Illini Nation appreciates you, Terrence. Who would have thunk it, in the fall of 2018 when our crew went to a scrimmage at Ubben to watch high school senior recruits Oscar Tshiebwe, EJ Liddell, and TSJ, with none of them choosing the Illini, that Terrence would end up being such a fabulous All-American at Illinois. It certainly wasn’t our crew who at the time thought TSJ was our definitive third choice of the three. I want it on record that I apologize for not believing in Terrence. I am so grateful to Brad that he stayed the course in his belief and brought TJ back to bring Illinois to the top, where he belongs.
my man, are you purposely misreading? He is stating Kolek’s turnovers come from passing. Most PG’s you compare to MD will have their TO’s due to passing because they do not turn the ball over from handling it nearly as much as MD does. Most of MD’s turnovers are due to a lack of ball handling. Saying “usage vs TO rate shows he’s a good ball handler” isn’t an accurate statement simply because most PG’s are getting their turnovers from passing, not from lack of handles like MD. There is a reason why our points per possession goes up when we’re full court pressed instead of one guy guarding MD bringing the ball up, and that’s because it means we pass the ball more to get it up the court.
You also seem to think that us saying MD has one fault and it’s ball handling that we’re coming for him as a player. We all love MD just as much as you, but are willing to admit he has weak handles for a player bringing the ball up the court.
I would like to give a comparison of Hepburn gaurding Braden Smith vs Domask. Smith and others like him rely on speed and quickness to be affective. When he can blow by someone and get separation it allows him to take it to the hoop or dish off for easy baskets. He also has a good pull up jumper game. Hepburn can stay in front of him and effectively shut that down. Smith was obviously frustrated and had no plan B so basically was taken out of the game. When I saw the problems Hepburn caused Purdue I wondered how we dealt with him the first time and how disruptive he would be yesterday. While he was a pest yesterday, he did not totally disrupt our offense like he did Purdue's. I think it comes down to this. Domask does not rely on quickness or speed by blowing by someone to be affective. Though if given the opportunity he will take it to the rack. He just puts them on his hip and works them to the goal (booty ball) and patiently pivots to get a good shot or shoots a fade away which is also a good shot for him. While Hepburn could stay in front of him he couldn't stop the slow back down into the paint making him less affective on Marcus. Also over the last several games Domask has gotten a lot better at finding the open man when the double comes limiting the times he gets bottled up forcing a turnover.Agree, and the assist to turnover rate for the type of offense we run is inherently low. The real question about this entire argument is what are the other options for this team's ball handler if not Marcus Domask? All in all, it is likely the best option to have MD with the ball a large majority of the time. And, it certainly seems to be working considering we have one of the most efficient offenses in country.
We don’t always agree but we do agree on our love for the Illini 🫡 which at the end of the day is all that mattersI didn't misread anything. Stating that all of Kolek's turnovers come from passing is ridiculous and not worth responding to. Is this anecdotal from watching a game or two or are there stats to back this theory up?
I never said there is a MD witch hunt. So far, only two people disagree with me.
EDIT: Also I enjoy spirited debates, so not upset with anyone, but I know I can come off as argumentative/crass. I said Gritty was one of my favorite peeps on here, and I meant that. I know you and I have went back and forth on some things too, so just know I agree with you that we're all on the same team here.
Well, I certainly disagree with your statement that MD is an elite ballhandler.I didn't misread anything. Stating that all of Kolek's turnovers come from passing is ridiculous and not worth responding to. Is this anecdotal from watching a game or two or are there stats to back this theory up?
I never said there is a MD witch hunt. So far, only two people disagree with me.
EDIT: Also I enjoy spirited debates, so not upset with anyone, but I know I can come off as argumentative/crass. I said Gritty was one of my favorite peeps on here, and I meant that. I know you and I have went back and forth on some things too, so just know I agree with you that we're all on the same team here.
Well, I certainly disagree with your statement that MD is an elite ballhandler.
Usage rate shows how often a player ends his team's possessions, either through a shot, drawing free throws, or turning the ball over.The turnover rate is as good as it gets though, for a guy with his usage rate.
Here's 4.There's 3
Is that a witch hunt? Still no.
Elite ballhandler is maybe the wrong way to put it. He doesn't wow you with fancy dribbling and shifty moves. The turnover rate is as good as it gets though, for a guy with his usage rate.