Illinois Basketball 2016-2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,051      
Offensively was not our problem last year. Defensively and rebounding margin were some of the worst in the history of the program. So unless the returning players have learned how to correct those 2 areas, we will need to hope that the new players (Black, Thorne, Nichols & Lucas) can. That defense and rebounding were painful to watch last year, plus too many guys taking plays off.

All of that, plus offense...
 
#1,052      
I was thinking the same exact thing...You guys are way more into this but my guesses for points per game

TA: 9
JCL: 11
MH: 15
LB: 10 (Yes I think he ends up starting)
MT: 10

You know what...what I look at that it really seems horrible, doesn't it?

Problem with adding up points is that we fans almost always overestimate the totals.

What do you see for averages for Morgan, Finke, Lucas, Williams, Jordan, Nichols, Tate, Austin?

Add it to 55 and see what you come up with. Morgan and Finke were at 7-8 ppg apiece last year, for example.
 
#1,053      
Offensively was not our problem last year. Defensively and rebounding margin were some of the worst in the history of the program. So unless the returning players have learned how to correct those 2 areas, we will need to hope that the new players (Black, Thorne, Nichols & Lucas) can. That defense and rebounding were painful to watch last year, plus too many guys taking plays off.

Pretty good odds of both of these happening. The freshmen will get stronger and smarter. Nichols already looks like a man amongst boys. We know Black and Thorne are good rebounders. And Thorne coming back allows Finke and Hill to play their natural positions. Plus, you can't get much worse than last season.
 
#1,054      
Problem with adding up points is that we fans almost always overestimate the totals.

What do you see for averages for Morgan, Finke, Lucas, Williams, Jordan, Nichols, Tate, Austin?

Add it to 55 and see what you come up with. Morgan and Finke were at 7-8 ppg apiece last year, for example.


TA/TJL 8
JCL 11
MH 14
MF/LB 11
MT/MM 11

DJW/AJ/KN 3

I think this is a conservative/realistic breakdown of what could be over the course of the season.

It seems easier to group some players together, because we know Finke, Black, Morgan, and Thorne could each score 8-12 points a game if each could play 30 minutes a game, but that isn't happening.

Realistically, we will only go 8 deep most likely with regulars. So DJW/AJ/Kipper will all probably "average" more points a game collectively, but they probably won't all play in every game (them or someone else..)

I was being conservative trying to get down to the 55 points that you threw out. I think if you add mine up, it is 58. Close.

I think Hill will probably get closer to 16 and JCL 12-14, but I was trying to make it work! :)
 
#1,055      
The 55 points I was talking about was how many the poster had from his starters. We will likely average around 70 or so. I was talking about adding the reserves' averages to that.

So, if 10 players play in every game, the points add up quickly. Let's say:

Hill 18
JCL 12
Thorne 10
Black 8
Abrams 6
Finke 6
Morgan 5
Lucas 3
Jordan 3
Williams 2
Others 3

I tried to be conservative but that still totals 73 among the rotation players not adding any from the deep reserves, so I probably overestimated. Hard not to.
 
#1,056      
The 55 points I was talking about was how many the poster had from his starters. We will likely average around 70 or so. I was talking about adding the reserves' averages to that.

So, if 10 players play in every game, the points add up quickly. Let's say:

Hill 18
JCL 12
Thorne 10
Black 8
Abrams 6
Finke 6
Morgan 5
Lucas 3
Jordan 3
Williams 2
Others 3

I tried to be conservative but that still totals 73 among the rotation players not adding any from the deep reserves, so I probably overestimated. Hard not to.
 
#1,057      
I like your totals Combes, but expect JCL to be more aggressive on offense. I think it will be Hill 15 and JCL 15.
 
#1,058      
TA/TJL 8
JCL 11
MH 14
MF/LB 11
MT/MM 11

DJW/AJ/KN 3

I think this is a conservative/realistic breakdown of what could be over the course of the season.

It seems easier to group some players together, because we know Finke, Black, Morgan, and Thorne could each score 8-12 points a game if each could play 30 minutes a game, but that isn't happening.

Realistically, we will only go 8 deep most likely with regulars. So DJW/AJ/Kipper will all probably "average" more points a game collectively, but they probably won't all play in every game (them or someone else..)

I was being conservative trying to get down to the 55 points that you threw out. I think if you add mine up, it is 58. Close.

I think Hill will probably get closer to 16 and JCL 12-14, but I was trying to make it work! :)

We'd be last in the conference if we had a 10-11 man rotation and only averaged 58 points.

I'll take a swing at it though:
MH- 15
JCL- 11
Abrams-8
Thorne-8
Black- 6
Finke- 6
Lucas/Tate- 5
Morgan-5
DJW/AJ/Kipper-6
KN-? If he's back, 12 ppg but takes away a couple from DJW/AJ, a couple from Lucas/ Tate, and one or two from JCL and Hill each.
 
Last edited:
#1,059      

Redbirds33333

Chicago, IL
We'd be last in the conference if we had a 10-11 man rotation and only averaged 58 points.

I'll take a swing at it though:
MH- 15
JCL- 11
Abrams-8
Thorne-8
Black- 6
Finke- 6
Lucas/Tate- 5
Morgan-5
DJW/AJ/Kipper-6
KN-? If he's back, 12 ppg but takes away a couple from DJW/AJ, a couple from Lucas/ Tate, and one or two from JCL and Hill each.


Always fun to give it a shot:

Hill - 16 (17 without KN)
JCL - 12 (14 without KN)
Thorne - 9 (10 without KN)
KN - 10
Abrams - 5 (6 without kn)
Black - 4
Finke - 5
Lucas/Tate - 5
Morgan - 6
Djw/Jordan/kipper - 7 (9 without KN)
 
#1,060      

Redbirds33333

Chicago, IL
Always fun to give it a shot:

Hill - 16 (17 without KN)
JCL - 12 (14 without KN)
Thorne - 9 (10 without KN)
KN - 10
Abrams - 5 (6 without kn)
Black - 4
Finke - 5
Lucas/Tate - 5
Morgan - 6
Djw/Jordan/kipper - 7 (9 without KN)

Basically view us as 3 points less ppg without him. Who knows.
 
#1,061      

Epsilon

M tipping over
Pdx
Question I have is now that we have some rebounders back on the court will we try to crash the boards more on the offensive glass? I hope and expect we will. Wonder what our rebounding numbers will look like...
 
#1,062      
Question I have is now that we have some rebounders back on the court will we try to crash the boards more on the offensive glass? I hope and expect we will. Wonder what our rebounding numbers will look like...

"They'll look better"

-coach pop
 
#1,067      
I think we will average closer to 80 maybe a touch above next year. But this assumes healthy players returning to form.

80 would lead the league in scoring. When was the last time we averaged 80? Without looking, it's been years. Not even the Dee/Deron teams averaged 80.
 
#1,068      
80 would lead the league in scoring. When was the last time we averaged 80? Without looking, it's been years. Not even the Dee/Deron teams averaged 80.

1994. We've hit 77 PPG a few times in between. I don't think this team will have any trouble scoring, but I don't expect a powerhouse. Probably in the low 70s.
 
#1,069      
Would it lead the league? What did Indiana avg last year? I was thinking they were around 80 or so. I don't know when the last time we did but I just think we can get close to it this year. Not that this team will be more talented or better than Dee/Deron teams but they are playing in what should be a system better equipped for scoring more points that Webers. Combined with a shorter shot clock and these freedom of movement rules or whatever and I think we can get there.



Indiana averaged 82.3. 80 might lead the league this year but it certainly wouldn't be a sure thing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#1,070      
1994. We've hit 77 PPG a few times in between. I don't think this team will have any trouble scoring, but I don't expect a powerhouse. Probably in the low 70s.



I would hope that we could be closer to 75 ppg at least this year. The MASH unit from last year averaged 72.1, so I'm hoping that they can add 2-3 ppg.
 
#1,071      
Our ppg doesn't need to improve significantly, but our points allowed per game certainly does. Having Black, Thorne, and improved Finke and Mav should help quite a bit. We need our backcourt players to improve their defense because we're still lacking a shot blocker, but players like JCL improved a ton towards the end and should be able to keep their guys in front of them so that we don't need to rely on a player in the post to clean things up. We'll see how Abrams does. His scoring, although it wasn't terribly efficient, should help as well, but his defense and leadership were his biggest assets. If we can have him exhibit at least one of those traits, we could be in pretty good shape.

The team has a pretty high ceiling on offense, but there are still question marks about the defense. If the latter is anything like like Groce's first couple of years, there could be great things accomplished. Hopefully last year's defense will be seen as an outlier.
 
#1,072      

89illinigrad

Chicago
80 would lead the league in scoring. When was the last time we averaged 80? Without looking, it's been years. Not even the Dee/Deron teams averaged 80.

I would think that, with the shorter shot clock, scoring averages are up, so its hard to compare to prior teams. I was actually a bit surprised that we averaged 72 ppg last year, so 80 ppg is not out of the question. However, we need to give up fewer than the 74 ppg we allowed last year if we are to be successful.
 
#1,073      
I would hope that we could be closer to 75 ppg at least this year. The MASH unit from last year averaged 72.1, so I'm hoping that they can add 2-3 ppg.

Could be. I'm not really too worried about the offense. The more exciting part to me is on defense, where we should be much, much better. Getting Thorne and Black back means rebounding should not be an issue and teams will get far fewer second chance opportunities. And even though Thorne's not a great defender or shot blocker, just having his size in the middle will be a deterrent to players trying to drive the lane. Having Abrams back along with all the frosh who are now sophs will mean the perimeter defense will be better as well. So that number should drop from 74 ppg to something in the 60s.
 
#1,074      
Feel free to file this under "too soon": but i wonder if someone else will wear 25 next season (JT or DJW)?
 
#1,075      
VCU will play Illinois in a neutral site game at American Airlines Arena in Miami on December 3. According to Rothstein tweet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.