Illinois Football Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#26      
Essentially what will happen with the "leveling of the playing field" is a 3rd party will monitor NIL deals. They are trying to ensure that the compensation for the deals match the advertising I guess is a good way to put it. Essentially a kid can't do one commercial for 2 million dollars.
Not saying some random tight end or shooting guard is Shaq-level, but there seems to be a lot of leeway out there and room for big money in advertising, I can see the numbers for a star college player getting to the $2M level pretty quick, for not much work.

Below is from a 2018 interview, the numbers are surely even higher now:

1733767971558.png
 
#31      
Not saying some random tight end or shooting guard is Shaq-level, but there seems to be a lot of leeway out there and room for big money in advertising, I can see the numbers for a star college player getting to the $2M level pretty quick, for not much work.

Below is from a 2018 interview, the numbers are surely even higher now:

View attachment 37900
I just used it as an example.....What I am saying is if Pat did an appearance at the YMCA and they paid him 2 mil.....this new rule would decide that 1 appearance isn't valued at 2 million.
 
#33      
Essentially what will happen with the "leveling of the playing field" is a 3rd party will monitor NIL deals. They are trying to ensure that the compensation for the deals match the advertising I guess is a good way to put it. Essentially a kid can't do one commercial for 2 million dollars.
I don’t see how you can restrict what a third party is willing to pay for an endorsement of any kind. If, say, Twin City Radiator wants to pay a player two million dollars for one autograph session, who has the authority to tell this private company that it’s overvaluing that endorsement. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that schools can’t restrict players from earning money on their name, image and likeness, so any attempt at doing so will no doubt be challenged in court and will likely lose.
 
#35      
This. I keep seeing declarations that the leveling of the playing field through reform is coming. Maybe I'm just pessimistic, but it seems naive to fully believe it. Why would the Haves of college football agree to level the playing field if they have such a current NIL advantage? Just so they get an effective salary cap and don't need to engage in an infinite NIL arms race? NIL was never supposed to be pay-for-play, but that lasted for like two seconds before programs just ignored it. Will it be different this time around?

My only comfort is that Whitman and Bielema keep saying this reform is on the way, and they believe it will be enforced. They have their fingers on the pulse of these changes and have earned my complete trust. But I still want to see it in practice.
Many decades ago, before the cap on scholarships, the B1G was known as the Big2 and the Little8... and part of the reason that was the way it was, was because the scUM and tOSU sidelines were over-crowded to the tune of 120-140 players - most of which never even saw the field... The Big2 would just keep stacking players to keep them from choosing a Little8 school - AND since only 1 B1G team was even ALLOWED to go to a bowl, the kids were naturally tuned into that... But since 8 is a bigger number than 2, when to came to deciding about CHANGES, the voting was heavily skewed... for obvious reasons... As with all things in life, when 'have-nots' outnumber 'haves' and decisions about change are made by vote - The playing field always levels out somewhat (until the Have's figure out a way to game the new landscape)...
 
#42      
Essentially what will happen with the "leveling of the playing field" is a 3rd party will monitor NIL deals. They are trying to ensure that the compensation for the deals match the advertising I guess is a good way to put it. Essentially a kid can't do one commercial for 2 million dollars.

This will be impossible to enforce unless there is new congressional legislation. It’s exactly the nightmare being experienced by the NCAA. I love (LOVE) Whitman, but he’s pitching a fever dream vision of college sport that is a strawman in the current landscape.

For those of you wanting more governance, the good news is the November elections likely created the right landscape to get new congressional legislation passed on college sport. The bigger question is whether it’s going to truly level the playing field (as being stated by ADs across the country) or whether sacrifices will be necessary to pass.
 
#48      
Essentially what will happen with the "leveling of the playing field" is a 3rd party will monitor NIL deals. They are trying to ensure that the compensation for the deals match the advertising I guess is a good way to put it. Essentially a kid can't do one commercial for 2 million dollars.
Does that also mean schools can’t run a bait and switch scheme?
 
#49      
Many decades ago, before the cap on scholarships, the B1G was known as the Big2 and the Little8... and part of the reason that was the way it was, was because the scUM and tOSU sidelines were over-crowded to the tune of 120-140 players - most of which never even saw the field... The Big2 would just keep stacking players to keep them from choosing a Little8 school - AND since only 1 B1G team was even ALLOWED to go to a bowl, the kids were naturally tuned into that... But since 8 is a bigger number than 2, when to came to deciding about CHANGES, the voting was heavily skewed... for obvious reasons... As with all things in life, when 'have-nots' outnumber 'haves' and decisions about change are made by vote - The playing field always levels out somewhat (until the Have's figure out a way to game the new landscape)...
I believe @IlliniInBuckeyeState has already established the time that will take

1733776706757.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back