Illinois Football Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#54      

On first quote … 5 star running back … Reached out to us … Bret staying loyal to his guys …

Second quote … Can confirm … Lot of guys already ALL IN … Someone turn on the DMX … 😎😎😎

Third quote … Couple of those former guys are dying to come back here … They left and realized how good they had it here … Willing to come back for $0 NIL … We run a professional program here and focus on development … Other programs … Not so much …
 
#55      
On first quote … 5 star running back … Reached out to us … Bret staying loyal to his guys …

Second quote … Can confirm … Lot of guys already ALL IN … Someone turn on the DMX … 😎😎😎

Third quote … Couple of those former guys are dying to come back here … They left and realized how good they had it here … Willing to come back for $0 NIL … We run a professional program here and focus on development … Other programs … Not so much …
Wonder who that could be? Tobe?
 
#56      
On first quote … 5 star running back … Reached out to us … Bret staying loyal to his guys …

Second quote … Can confirm … Lot of guys already ALL IN … Someone turn on the DMX … 😎😎😎

Third quote … Couple of those former guys are dying to come back here … They left and realized how good they had it here … Willing to come back for $0 NIL … We run a professional program here and focus on development … Other programs … Not so much …
X gon' give it to ya!?! As in, Scott coming back!?
 
#57      
Speaking to that last part, is Calvin Smith still an interesting guy? Warning sign that Purdue didn't even play him with their defense that bad? Can Josaiah Knight get into Illinois this offseason?
 
#58      
On first quote … 5 star running back … Reached out to us … Bret staying loyal to his guys …

Second quote … Can confirm … Lot of guys already ALL IN … Someone turn on the DMX … 😎😎😎

Third quote … Couple of those former guys are dying to come back here … They left and realized how good they had it here … Willing to come back for $0 NIL … We run a professional program here and focus on development … Other programs … Not so much …
Can you give us any indication what schools are not living up to transfers' expectations? Is this a result of unfulfilled NIL promises or more that the culture here is just better? I'm sure you can't share names of specific recruits/former players, but anything you could share generally would be awesome.
 
#59      
On first quote … 5 star running back … Reached out to us … Bret staying loyal to his guys …

Second quote … Can confirm … Lot of guys already ALL IN … Someone turn on the DMX … 😎😎😎

Third quote … Couple of those former guys are dying to come back here … They left and realized how good they had it here … Willing to come back for $0 NIL … We run a professional program here and focus on development … Other programs … Not so much …
5 Star RB already in the portal? Or back channeled?
 
#60      
Can you give us any indication what schools are not living up to transfers' expectations? Is this a result of unfulfilled NIL promises or more that the culture here is just better? I'm sure you can't share names of specific recruits/former players, but anything you could share generally would be awesome.
well, if those 5 guys come back, you'll know real quick what schools he is referencing. OR you could look up guys that have left our program and where they went to and figure out pretty quickly the schools as well. The good news is, we aren't the school people are leaving because we are a train wreck. It's nice not being that school anymore.
 
#63      
On first quote … 5 star running back … Reached out to us … Bret staying loyal to his guys …

Second quote … Can confirm … Lot of guys already ALL IN … Someone turn on the DMX … 😎😎😎

Third quote … Couple of those former guys are dying to come back here … They left and realized how good they had it here … Willing to come back for $0 NIL … We run a professional program here and focus on development … Other programs … Not so much …
Um, that would be very difficult to turn down a 5 star player because we are too deep at a position. With injuries that our RB's seem to get over the years, Feagin two years in a row, Laughery had injury issues for a couple of years, and this year might be the 1st year McCray was healthy. I just kinda cringe when hearing that we are turning down 5 star players.
 
#64      
Great updates from coach. My only 2 cents is that our Rb's aren't over the top great. There is no Pat Bryant playing running back. We would be playing with gasoline if we did have a PB in the back field. It would help Luke to next level.
 
#65      
Third quote … Couple of those former guys are dying to come back here … They left and realized how good they had it here … Willing to come back for $0 NIL … We run a professional program here and focus on development … Other programs … Not so much …
Maybe Andrew Dennis can go back and forth between us and Michigan State a few more times?
 
#66      
Um, that would be very difficult to turn down a 5 star player because we are too deep at a position. With injuries that our RB's seem to get over the years, Feagin two years in a row, Laughery had injury issues for a couple of years, and this year might be the 1st year McCray was healthy. I just kinda cringe when hearing that we are turning down 5 star players.
I have no idea to whom indy is alluding but just because someone was highly ranked out of HS doesn't mean he's a great get now.
 
#68      
i'm wondering if Bret's comment about the running back room is
designed to keep those currently on the roster. There's probably a
couple who might want to the "the guy" somewhere else. It seems
we go through injuries at RB quite often.
 
#71      
1 of 2….95%
2 of 2…65-70%

Boy, wonder who’s who.

So, theoretically, if one is at 95%, do you mean that the second is at a 65-70% or that the odds of getting both at 65-70%? Because of it it’s the latter….

To solve for the odds of the second event (let's call it Event Gabe), we can use the formula for the probability of two independent events happening together. The probability of both events X and Gabe occurring (P(C ∩ Gabe)) is related to the probabilities of X and Gabe as follows:

\[
P(X \cap Gabe) = P( ) \times P(Gabe \mid X)
\]

where:

- \( P(X) \) is the probability of Event X (95% or 0.95),
- \( P(Gabe \mid X) \) is the probability of Event Gabe happening given that Event X has occurred.

You are given that the probability of both events happening together is between 65% and 70% (or 0.65 to 0.70). So, we have the equation:

\[
P(X \cap Gabe) = P(C) \times P(Gabe) = 0.65 \text{ to } 0.70
\]

Now, solve for \( P(Gabe) \):

\[
P(Gabe) = \frac{P(X \cap Gabe)}{P(X)}
\]

Substitute the values:

\[
P(Gabe) = \frac{0.65}{0.95} \approx 0.684 \quad \text{to} \quad P(Gabe) = \frac{0.70}{0.95} \approx 0.737
\]

So, the probability of Event Gabe occurring is approximately between **68.4% and 73.7%**.
 
#72      
Boy, wonder who’s who.

So, theoretically, if one is at 95%, do you mean that the second is at a 65-70% or that the odds of getting both at 65-70%? Because of it it’s the latter….

To solve for the odds of the second event (let's call it Event Gabe), we can use the formula for the probability of two independent events happening together. The probability of both events X and Gabe occurring (P(C ∩ Gabe)) is related to the probabilities of X and Gabe as follows:

\[
P(X \cap Gabe) = P( ) \times P(Gabe \mid X)
\]

where:

- \( P(X) \) is the probability of Event X (95% or 0.95),
- \( P(Gabe \mid X) \) is the probability of Event Gabe happening given that Event X has occurred.

You are given that the probability of both events happening together is between 65% and 70% (or 0.65 to 0.70). So, we have the equation:

\[
P(X \cap Gabe) = P(C) \times P(Gabe) = 0.65 \text{ to } 0.70
\]

Now, solve for \( P(Gabe) \):

\[
P(Gabe) = \frac{P(X \cap Gabe)}{P(X)}
\]

Substitute the values:

\[
P(Gabe) = \frac{0.65}{0.95} \approx 0.684 \quad \text{to} \quad P(Gabe) = \frac{0.70}{0.95} \approx 0.737
\]

So, the probability of Event Gabe occurring is approximately between **68.4% and 73.7%**.
Whoa there
 
#73      
Boy, wonder who’s who.

So, theoretically, if one is at 95%, do you mean that the second is at a 65-70% or that the odds of getting both at 65-70%? Because of it it’s the latter….

To solve for the odds of the second event (let's call it Event Gabe), we can use the formula for the probability of two independent events happening together. The probability of both events X and Gabe occurring (P(C ∩ Gabe)) is related to the probabilities of X and Gabe as follows:

\[
P(X \cap Gabe) = P( ) \times P(Gabe \mid X)
\]

where:

- \( P(X) \) is the probability of Event X (95% or 0.95),
- \( P(Gabe \mid X) \) is the probability of Event Gabe happening given that Event X has occurred.

You are given that the probability of both events happening together is between 65% and 70% (or 0.65 to 0.70). So, we have the equation:

\[
P(X \cap Gabe) = P(C) \times P(Gabe) = 0.65 \text{ to } 0.70
\]

Now, solve for \( P(Gabe) \):

\[
P(Gabe) = \frac{P(X \cap Gabe)}{P(X)}
\]

Substitute the values:

\[
P(Gabe) = \frac{0.65}{0.95} \approx 0.684 \quad \text{to} \quad P(Gabe) = \frac{0.70}{0.95} \approx 0.737
\]

So, the probability of Event Gabe occurring is approximately between **68.4% and 73.7%**.
the hangover GIF
 
#75      
Boy, wonder who’s who.

So, theoretically, if one is at 95%, do you mean that the second is at a 65-70% or that the odds of getting both at 65-70%? Because of it it’s the latter….

To solve for the odds of the second event (let's call it Event Gabe), we can use the formula for the probability of two independent events happening together. The probability of both events X and Gabe occurring (P(C ∩ Gabe)) is related to the probabilities of X and Gabe as follows:

\[
P(X \cap Gabe) = P( ) \times P(Gabe \mid X)
\]

where:

- \( P(X) \) is the probability of Event X (95% or 0.95),
- \( P(Gabe \mid X) \) is the probability of Event Gabe happening given that Event X has occurred.

You are given that the probability of both events happening together is between 65% and 70% (or 0.65 to 0.70). So, we have the equation:

\[
P(X \cap Gabe) = P(C) \times P(Gabe) = 0.65 \text{ to } 0.70
\]

Now, solve for \( P(Gabe) \):

\[
P(Gabe) = \frac{P(X \cap Gabe)}{P(X)}
\]

Substitute the values:

\[
P(Gabe) = \frac{0.65}{0.95} \approx 0.684 \quad \text{to} \quad P(Gabe) = \frac{0.70}{0.95} \approx 0.737
\]

So, the probability of Event Gabe occurring is approximately between **68.4% and 73.7%**.
So you’re saying there’s a chance?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back