Illinois Football Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#404      
Bielema better get this QB situation right. Indiana has gotten it right with two different quarterbacks the last two years. You can't miss on a QB this year, period.
 
#405      

Football Hype GIF by Indiana Hoosiers
 
#409      
Just looked him up, has to be one of the best backup RBs in P4. Interesting recruiting background (was looking if Illinois offered out of HS - did not), with a lot of smaller school offers (SIU, Lindenwood, really good FCS programs), G5 programs all over the map (Air Force, Arkansas State), and then a couple big offers (first offer was from FSU and Arizona State, last offer was from Mizzou). The timing of these offers are unusual. Usually you see a cluster of offers from similar programs as the player sends out their film. His timeline doesn't really reflect that. Every month he would get 1-3 offers from schools across the country. Nothing crazy, just a little different than what I usually see.

That said, if Illinois is hellbent on completely reshaping their RB room (I don't think they are), this would be a great starting point.
I’m hoping the way to read this is that there will be changes to RB room but not a complete overhaul. That group is not elite.
 
#414      
It's early in the transfer portal season, but (a) there's a greater amount of good QBs already announced in the portal than I expected, and (b) I have high expectations for Illinois to land someone highly regarded based on the increased supply and discussion about greater $$ infused into the program than before.


I wouldn't classify the Harvard QB as checking that last box.
 
#415      
It's early in the transfer portal season, but (a) there's a greater amount of good QBs already announced in the portal than I expected, and (b) I have high expectations for Illinois to land someone highly regarded based on the increased supply and discussion about greater $$ infused into the program than before.


I wouldn't classify the Harvard QB as checking that last box.

Understandable, but on the flip side... this staff did great getting both DeVito and Luke. I wouldn't call either of those guys highly regarded either at the time either.

No reason not to trust the staffs eval on QBs right now.
 
#416      
Understandable, but on the flip side... this staff did great getting both DeVito and Luke. I wouldn't call either of those guys highly regarded either at the time either.

No reason not to trust the staffs eval on QBs right now.
I think the hope is that as we work our way up the food chain, we don't have to take on as much risk with the players we obtain. Luke's first year was our only down year in the last 4, all the talk of increased NIL and 8+ wins 3 of the last 4 seasons should hopefully translate to a top-tier QB to come in and keep the progress pointed up.
 
#421      
Understandable, but on the flip side... this staff did great getting both DeVito and Luke. I wouldn't call either of those guys highly regarded either at the time either.

No reason not to trust the staffs eval on QBs right now.

The trust is extremely high! If Illinois gets the Harvard QB, there could be a signal there that the staff viewed the cost/benefit was too good to ignore, this allowed them to add a few other dynamic pieces later in the portal, believe he has a much higher ceiling than public opinion, or they see promise with another QB already on the roster and want a real competition, etc. There are lots of seasons for their choices. My opinion is also worthless in the decision making process, hence the discussion board. But that's the fun of sharing the opinion. Of course I trust the staff, but that doesn't mean I (a) like the Harvard QB or (b) think he's better than, say, Josh Hoover or DJ Lagway or other names in the portal. We can still question, judge, etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back