mhuml32
Gesture of Northern Aggression
Bret’s retention has been unbelievably good.
This. It's impressive how little the program has lost starters or up-and-comers in the NIL era.
Bret’s retention has been unbelievably good.
That would be a home run, IMO.Yes …
Running back at Joliet Catholic. I'd bring him back to the RB room also.Technically a TE …
It speaks to the culture being built here. Altmyer sticking around, despite higher bidders trying to pull him from Champaign, is a perfect example of what Coach B is building.This. It's impressive how little the program has lost starters or up-and-comers in the NIL era.
For me, the three guys we absolutely positively cannot lose (offensively): Valentine, Clement, Dixon. Lock those three up and I'd feel great.X spouting that Bowick is next?
No! J-Bo is my guy!X spouting that Bowick is next?
Genuinely don’t think I'd rather have anyone else. Hopefully we have the resources/relationships.Yes …
With Thad leaving I’d be more concerned about Valentine leaving. Not saying it’ll happen but he was close with Thad
Retain them all … I’d give it a 50% shot …
Valentine will want RB1 guarantee and more NIL …
Don’t expect it to impact either incoming freshman …
With Thad leaving I’d be more concerned about Valentine leaving. Not saying it’ll happen but he was close with Thad
25-30 carries a game. My guess:Okay I definitely was off on that. But would imagine Laughery continues to be in the 5-8 per game range so yes, one more guy that can top out at 10. As stated earlier maybe Jordan Andersen can be that guy.
I believe we perused him months ago. Should now be in the process of pursuing him.......
Valentine needs 15 carries/game. One of the issues this year with having all three backs is you can’t exactly “unleash” one guy. It’s constantly splitting reps and doesn’t lead to a ton of rhythm.25-30 carries a game. My guess:
Valentine 12-15 carries
Laughery or Feagin 8-10 carries
Current RB on staff 5 carries
Also, need a RB who can block.
I think Barnett will be RB3 in four games at a minimum.Valentine needs 15 carries/game. One of the issues this year with having all three backs is you can’t exactly “unleash” one guy. It’s constantly splitting reps and doesn’t lead to a ton of rhythm.
JMO — would not be super discouraged with retaining Valentine but losing one of the others. I think Barnett could serve as a nice 3rd RB.
Valentine needs 15 carries/game. One of the issues this year with having all three backs is you can’t exactly “unleash” one guy. It’s constantly splitting reps and doesn’t lead to a ton of rhythm.
JMO — would not be super discouraged with retaining Valentine but losing one of the others. I think Barnett could serve as a nice 3rd RB.
He flashed but 20 receptions should be easy to replaceX spouting that Bowick is next?
He flashed but 20 receptions should be easy to replace
Get Coach B a 3 or 4x! He can do it! In Brett I trust!
Completely agree.No! J-Bo is my guy!
Bowick has 4 touchdowns in the regular season and 2 were in the first game against Western Illinois. He didn’t have any in the last 8 regular season games.What does is say about Elzy that this is the guy that beat him out. I will say Bowick is very good in the red zone
Ashton Hollins feels like a good candidate for many snaps, and solid production.For me, the three guys we absolutely positively cannot lose (offensively): Valentine, Clement, Dixon. Lock those three up and I'd feel great.
That third reciever spot I think we can upgrade.
This. There will be games that are decided by a missed or made field goal or 3 pt attempt, especially as the transfer portal has put many more teams on “equal playing field.”I’ve posted this before, but if Olano wins us just one game we wouldn’t have won, there is $$ value to the difference between 5-7 or 6-6 and 9-3 or 10-2 (and everywhere in between). I just keep watching kickers on CFP teams missing kicks that Olano would make. I fear we are undervaluing the position.