Illinois Football Recruiting Thread

#30      
....is Lopati recruitment dead-dead? Or is there a pulse with Michigan in shambles?


Just Asking Pulp Fiction GIF
 
#34      
My guess is, while Michigan’s season may be in shambles, their pocket’s are fine and that is the greater consideration.
Pocketbook and probably has a good chance at starting. If they kick Whittingham to the curb who knows but would bet we get outbid again
 
#36      
I'm guessing Notre Dame is waiting in the wings. They are bringing in a QB that's average (for them) and their sell for offense is many magnitudes better than Michigan right now.
 
#37      
We’re gonna get a transfer anyway so 🤷🏻‍♂️
At what point will we trust a QB that we recruited from high school? I know it's always win now, but if you feel decent about Clayton, can't we put that money elsewhere?

For the record, I think we have nailed it on getting transfer QBs. Even Paddock was a hit.

Also, I'd be extremely cautious paying big money for an unproven recruit like Lopati, as I'm sure he will demand more than we can afford for an unproven talent and also leave shortly thereafter for a bigger school/paycheck.

We can't afford to pay him to just sit.
 
#38      
At what point will we trust a QB that we recruited from high school? I know it's always win now, but if you feel decent about Clayton, can't we put that money elsewhere?

For the record, I think we have nailed it on getting transfer QBs. Even Paddock was a hit.

Also, I'd be extremely cautious paying big money for an unproven recruit like Lopati, as I'm sure he will demand more than we can afford for an unproven talent and also leave shortly thereafter for a bigger school/paycheck.

We can't afford to pay him to just sit.
The risk/reward of paying top dollar for a high school QB just seems to not be there no matter what kind of program you are.

That's a different question than developing through the program and Clayton, but there's every reason to think we can find a QB who will be better than Lopati in 2027 for less money, especially because we seem to have a competitive advantage identifying and appealing to a certain type of Lunney-friendly QB.
 
#39      
At what point will we trust a QB that we recruited from high school? I know it's always win now, but if you feel decent about Clayton, can't we put that money elsewhere?

For the record, I think we have nailed it on getting transfer QBs. Even Paddock was a hit.

Also, I'd be extremely cautious paying big money for an unproven recruit like Lopati, as I'm sure he will demand more than we can afford for an unproven talent and also leave shortly thereafter for a bigger school/paycheck.

We can't afford to pay him to just sit.

Even if they trust Clayton enough as a starter I don't think they would want to enter the season with only him and Boyd as 1/2 on the depth chart. Odds are they are not going to want to turn over the keys to a true sophomore without him seriously earning it in spring/fall camp. Luke's first year as a redshirt sophomore starter was BB's worst here after his first season.
 
#42      
The risk/reward of paying top dollar for a high school QB just seems to not be there no matter what kind of program you are.

That's a different question than developing through the program and Clayton, but there's every reason to think we can find a QB who will be better than Lopati in 2027 for less money, especially because we seem to have a competitive advantage identifying and appealing to a certain type of Lunney-friendly QB.
In this market, there's no way I'd be spending big money on a freshman quarterback destined for a learning year. I still long for the days of program and player development, not renting players on an annual basis.

I'm sure Bret already had a watchlist of quarterbacks for next year ready before this season started that will have hours of tape done up on each by the time the season ends. I don't know if Clayton is the guy, but he looked pretty decent for a true freshman.

Agreeing with @blackdog that it would be a bad career move to rely on two unproven guys for an entire season.
 
#43      
In this market, there's no way I'd be spending big money on a freshman quarterback destined for a learning year. I still long for the days of program and player development, not renting players on an annual basis.

I'm sure Bret already had a watchlist of quarterbacks for next year ready before this season started that will have hours of tape done up on each by the time the season ends. I don't know if Clayton is the guy, but he looked pretty decent for a true freshman.

Agreeing with @blackdog that it would be a bad career move to rely on two unproven guys for an entire season.

They already have a qb board and know who will be available.
 
Back