Illinois Football Uniforms

#5      
More arched ILLINI helmet deployment.

And I've finally made my peace with SLANT ILLINOIS after 37 seasons. In the same way I imagine that the Wolverine faithful who came of age during the Great Depression had made peace by the mid-'70s with Fritz Crisler taking Princeton's winged helmet design to Ann Arbor with him. ;)

That's all I've got moving into summer.
 
#6      
I've all but given up, haha ... and the amazing developments this year on the basketball uniform front has helped me deal with it. :ROFLMAO:

It seems that one of the following is the case, IMO. Just substitute "Bret" for whoever actually chooses the uniforms each game, but he has been the constant since we got the new uniforms.

(A) Bret absolutely hates the idea of blue pants with the white jersey in and of itself.


(B) When it comes to our uniforms' 3-stripe patterns, Bret thinks it would look bad to ever use three different ones. I of course think this would look totally fine, but it's just a guess, lol. For example, the all-navy Music City Bowl look only uses one striping pattern:
---> [O/W/O - on - Blue] helmet
---> [O/W/O - on - Blue] shoulder stripes
---> [O/W/O - on - Blue] pants

There are several combos where at least two match, with one example being our standard home uniform:
---> [B/W/B - on - Orange] helmet
---> [O/W/O - on - Blue] shoulder stripes
---> [B/W/B - on - Orange] pants

Assuming the standard orange helmet, the classic #BPOTR look would be three different ones:
---> [B/W/B - on - Orange] helmet
---> [B/O/B - on - White] shoulder stripes
---> [O/W/O - on - Blue] for the pants.


(C) Bret simply just does not care at all, and the mere possibility of wearing our blue pants on the road has literally never crossed his mind.



Personally, I find (C) really unlikely ... he seemed pretty invested in getting our uniforms back to this look. I also find (A) at least sort of unlikely, because we have worn blue pants at home (and most recently in Nashville) multiple times over the last few years. So, my bet would be some very casual preference toward (B) that he has?
 
#7      
Never slant Illinois. To remind you all I despise the stupid reason we adopted it: So people would know who we are. It’s small time and degrading.

People will know who we are when we win. And we’re doing that now.
 
#8      
More arched ILLINI helmet deployment.

And I've finally made my peace with SLANT ILLINOIS after 37 seasons. In the same way I imagine that the Wolverine faithful who came of age during the Great Depression had made peace by the mid-'70s with Fritz Crisler taking Princeton's winged helmet design to Ann Arbor with him. ;)

That's all I've got moving into summer.

That math can't be right. I remember when they debuted those my freshman year and that was at best 10 years ago.

Oh, man.
 
#9      
That math can't be right. I remember when they debuted those my freshman year and that was at best 10 years ago.

Oh, man.
lol "at best." I hear you, brother. The math on that one is brutal for me, too. I console myself with fond memories of the '89-'90 seasons after those helmets debuted.
 
#10      
Never slant Illinois. To remind you all I despise the stupid reason we adopted it: So people would know who we are. It’s small time and degrading.

People will know who we are when we win. And we’re doing that now.
I despised it for decades for that exact reason. I accept it now. Fans like it and I'm finally OK with it (the '89 version, not the Zook-era one.) Still want the arched Illini helmet to dominate and (speaking of Fritz Crisler's theft from Princeton), quite frankly, wouldn't mind seeing the stripes Bob Blackman brought from Dartmouth in ~ '71 for the helmet that introduced that logo.

1778677113437.png
 
#12      
*crickets*

Our Nike contract is up in a couple weeks and there is nothing being said about it? I have to imagine at this point we are going to stay with Nike, otherwise the rollout with a new provider would have to be at absolute warp speed to be ready for August. It just seems stunning that we are this close to July 1 and nothing is being said about negotiations or bids or renewal with Nike. Are we trying to parlay our recent success into a better deal? But do we have any leverage if there is little chance we can get a new supplier ready to provide uniforms on such a short timeline, when these things typically take at least a year to get in motion?

It all just feels surprising and disappointing that this news is going to probably come out with a last minute whimper, rather than a big exciting announcement that everyone is excited about.

Come on insiders, does anybody know anything about where we stand with Nike and maybe others?
 
#14      
Is it possible that's not true? Via some sort of extension done quietly?

Because otherwise I very much agree with your post.
Unless there was a renewal we all missed, which seems really unlikely, it's definitely up July 1st.

"The University of Illinois Division of Intercollegiate Athletics (DIA) and Nike have extended their two-decade-old relationship for the foreseeable future as Nike will continue to be the footwear, apparel and equipment provider for the 21 Fighting Illini varsity sports. Nike has been the exclusive footwear and apparel provider for the DIA for 20 years with this 10-year agreement extending the relationship through the 2025-26 academic year."
...
"This extension will go into effect July 1, 2016."


And, even weirder, the last deal was announced on January 19th, 2016.

It's pretty crazy we're under a month out and it's radio silence on this. But unlike previous DIAs, there's no doubt Josh knows what he's doing.
 
#16      
Sure hope there is no news and we are staying with them considering we are currently looking the best we have looked in my lifetime by a country mile.
It would be especially tragic of some brand switch messed with the current momentum on the basketball uniform front. I agree our football uniforms are the best they've been since I've been a fan ... but the (non-1LL1NO1S) basketball uniforms are easily among the best in the nation, and that is regularly affirmed by non-Illini fans on social media posts that rank uniforms!
 
#17      
Sure hope there is no news and we are staying with them considering we are currently looking the best we have looked in my lifetime by a country mile.
It would be especially tragic of some brand switch messed with the current momentum on the basketball uniform front. I agree our football uniforms are the best they've been since I've been a fan ... but the (non-1LL1NO1S) basketball uniforms are easily among the best in the nation, and that is regularly affirmed by non-Illini fans on social media posts that rank uniforms!
Yes. But eliminate the 1LL1NO1S font altogether everywhere immediately. Otherwise, agree with @mattcoldagelli + @Fighter of the Nightman. Football kit hasn't looked this good since the early '80s (and IMO looks even better.) Basketball ex-1LL1NO1S uni mix is flat out the best in the nation.

I still haven't fully absorbed the re-intro of the orange scripts. I never thought I'd see them again. In less than one season they've become an iconic branding vector. :love:
 
#18      
Yes. But eliminate the 1LL1NO1S font altogether everywhere immediately. Otherwise, agree with @mattcoldagelli + @Fighter of the Nightman. Football kit hasn't looked this good since the early '80s (and IMO looks even better.) Basketball ex-1LL1NO1S uni mix is flat out the best in the nation.

I still haven't fully absorbed the re-intro of the orange scripts. I never thought I'd see them again. In less than one season they've become an iconic branding vector. :love:
Yeah, (only semi-) OT and all, but I think this postseason went a LONG way toward solidifying the Script look as a huge part of our basketball brand. I absolutely love the Flyin' Illini uniforms, don't get me wrong ... but from our first BTT game through the Final Four (i.e., the most visible this program has been in two decades!!) we wore...

1) White Script vs. Wisconsin (BTT Quarterfinals)
2) White Script vs. Penn (NCAAT First Round)
3) Orange Script vs. VCU (NCAAT Second Round)
4) Orange Script vs. Houston (NCAAT Sweet Sixteen)
5) White Script vs. Iowa (NCAAT Elite Eight)
6) Orange Script vs. UConn (NCAAT Final Four)

And compared to regular season games where an audience of 1 million viewers is very large, these games drew huge national audiences that culminated in over 14 million watching our Final Four matchup with UConn. I would not discount the number of casual college hoops fans (especially younger ones) who see our Script look as inseparably iconic when it comes to the "Illini Basketball brand."
 
#20      
The important part of the potential renewing of the Nike deal is this question:

Do we finally get an Illini edition of the Zoom Pegasus 42 and/or an Air Max shoe?

If yes- Renegotiate in good faith
If no- Dump the swoosh. The bar to get these shoes isn't high, Purdue, Mizzou, and many schools lower on totem pole get these shoes.
 
#21      
Yeah, (only semi-) OT and all, but I think this postseason went a LONG way toward solidifying the Script look as a huge part of our basketball brand. I absolutely love the Flyin' Illini uniforms, don't get me wrong ... but from our first BTT game through the Final Four (i.e., the most visible this program has been in two decades!!) we wore...

1) White Script vs. Wisconsin (BTT Quarterfinals)
2) White Script vs. Penn (NCAAT First Round)
3) Orange Script vs. VCU (NCAAT Second Round)
4) Orange Script vs. Houston (NCAAT Sweet Sixteen)
5) White Script vs. Iowa (NCAAT Elite Eight)
6) Orange Script vs. UConn (NCAAT Final Four)

And compared to regular season games where an audience of 1 million viewers is very large, these games drew huge national audiences that culminated in over 14 million watching our Final Four matchup with UConn. I would not discount the number of casual college hoops fans (especially younger ones) who see our Script look as inseparably iconic when it comes to the "Illini Basketball brand."
Spot on, brother. It's powerful branding and I'm so here for it.
 
#22      
Is it possible that's not true? Via some sort of extension done quietly?

Because otherwise I very much agree with your post.
This was the correct question to ask. I plugged it into the AI, which found a link to this page:

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Exemption #1JNM2503E

Announcement of an Exempt Purchase​


Change Order
Published Wednesday February 4, 2026

Vendor: Varsity Brands Holding Co Inc
Change Order Amount: $200,000
This change order is to add additional funds and extend the term until 6/30/27.


The University award process may be delayed as this award goes through a state approval process.
Change Order
Published Monday January 27, 2025

Vendor: Varsity Brands Holding Co Inc
Change Order Amount: $200,000
This change order is to add additional funds and extend the term until 6/30/26.

The State Purchasing Officer for this procurement is now Todd Donaldson.
The University award process may be delayed as this award goes through a state approval process.

Award InfoPublished Tuesday March 12, 2024​

Varsity Brands Holding Co IncFarmers Branch, TX
  • Amount: An estimated $200,000
  • Terms: An estimated start date of 7/1/2024 through 6/30/2025
  • Renewals: None

Summary​

VENDORS​

1total
0BEP vendors
0VBP vendors
0Small businesses
The University award process may be delayed as this award goes through a state approval process.
First published Tuesday, March 12, 2024
The University awarded a contract for Athletic Clothing & Equipment.
Nike athletic apparel and equipment.
This purchase is exempt from the usual selection processes of the Procurement Code because the procurement expenditure is for events or activities paid for exclusively by revenues generated by the event or activity, gifts, or donations for the event or activity, private grants, or any combination thereof. (30 ILCS 500 / 1-13(b)(2)) .

Basically, it seems like for the past few years we have allotted $200,000 a year to buy "Nike athletic apparel and equipment" from a Nike-affiliated vendor called Varsity Brands Holding Company Inc. I imagine that is the company that actually gets the clothes from Nike and puts Illinois logos on it.

But if you look at that page, it looks like this allotment was renewed in February 2026 for the 2026-27 term, going through June 30, 2027. This certainly seems to indicate/confirm that we will be wearing Nike gear in 2026-27.

What this means for the actual deal with Nike is less clear. We could either:

1. Have a full extension in place that hasn't been announced publicly (doubtful);
2. Have an agreement in principle that is still being tinkered with in the finer details and pending official approval (maybe most likely, but still surprising given these deals never get announced with so little time left on the clock; you would think they would announce a deal in principle); or
3. Have a mini year-to-year extension occurring that allows Illinois, Nike, and maybe others, to continue to negotiate a new long term deal (honestly I think this could be it; not sure if public institutions can operate contracts that way, but in the business world this seems fairly standard practice).

Bottom line: We can begin to understand from this why we haven't heard any developments just a few weeks out from the contract expiring, because we will be wearing Nike this year. But we still don't know enough to say anything about a long term deal with Nike or another company.
 
#23      
The important part of the potential renewing of the Nike deal is this question:

Do we finally get an Illini edition of the Zoom Pegasus 42 and/or an Air Max shoe?

If yes- Renegotiate in good faith
If no- Dump the swoosh. The bar to get these shoes isn't high, Purdue, Mizzou, and many schools lower on totem pole get these shoes.
Can I get greedy and also ask for Illini-inspired Dunks! I have a pair of blue on white ones I wear in Fridays since those are the school colors of where I work. Gamedays would be better with Illini Dunks.
 
Back