Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread (May-June 2018)

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,476      
"Fall recruiting"? No such thing. There is 2019 recruiting, 2020 recruiting and so on. We did very well on this incoming class. It's completely irrelevant when the players committed. Would Tevian Jones or any other player be better if he/they committed in the fall instead of the spring? No.

There are still more players committing in the fall, we did well this spring, but that doesn't make it a sustainable practice, & well this spring is heavily biased by what is left.
 
#1,477      

mattcoldagelli

The Transfer Portal with Do Not Contact Tag
We may not be getting every player we want, but I definitely see roster construction.

And maybe what we're seeing now is just a byproduct of that approach to roster construction, I dunno.

As has been pointed out, it's not like we're going 0-for. It's just that we seem to be chasing shiny objects and getting caught flat-footed. I sneered at the concern of us burning through our OVs, but that seems to be of a piece with this approach, as well. And it would seem our OVs are not exactly lighting the world on fire.

It's hard to explain the Braun result as anything other than a misread of what that kid was interested in.
 
#1,478      
Of the last minute bigs we were recruiting, I only think Okoro would have played any significant minutes next season. Golden, Brawn, HInson and Calloo would possibly have been of help in future seasons though, but it would be a roll of the dice.
 
Last edited:
#1,479      
just never stop recruiting like that since players leave all the time

Underwood has spoken in these terms publicly.

That wouldn't be entirely dissimilar from what goes on at WVU.

So maybe.

Trouble is, the horrible talent imbalance between our backcourt and frontcourt is tough to fix through a Creaning carousel of spring flyers.
 
#1,480      

sacraig

The desert
Well, you can argue that every recruiting loss is a "misread". You cast a net, sometimes very wide, and often it comes up empty.

It's pretty simple to me. At this particular point with our roster, we had a spot and we identified some number of players that we thought could contribute to the team. We went after them.

We did have other options. We could have identified players who fit but not pursued them because we read them as unlikely to ever commit. We could have identified players that didn't fit but were likely to commit. I don't see the merit in that.

In the 14th month of the Brad Underwood era, we lost out on a top 250 player who would have been our 7th recruit in this class. This isn't even a story but for the apparent need of some people to create unnecessary drama.

I'm just quoting this so that anyone who skipped it the first time might read the quoted version. Everyone here needs to take a chill pill and maybe have a beer.
 
#1,481      

Joel Goodson

dawgville
Well, you can argue that every recruiting loss is a "misread". You cast a net, sometimes very wide, and often it comes up empty.

It's pretty simple to me. At this particular point with our roster, we had a spot and we identified some number of players that we thought could contribute to the team. We went after them.

We did have other options. We could have identified players who fit but not pursued them because we read them as unlikely to ever commit. We could have identified players that didn't fit but were likely to commit. I don't see the merit in that.

In the 14th month of the Brad Underwood era, we lost out on a top 250 player who would have been our 7th recruit in this class. This isn't even a story but for the apparent need of some people to create unnecessary drama.

This. Making mountains out of molehills is what we do. Don't be that guy.

Braun saw a better fit elsewhere. So be it. Columbia is a heckuva lot closer to home than CU is. Be very careful drawing conclusions about our program from the Braun recruitment.
 
#1,483      

EJ33

San Francisco
Everybody panic we lost an unranked longshot redshirt-needing lanky 12 ppg prospect. Underwood is totally failing.
 
#1,484      
This board is hilarious. I liked Bruan, but Kipper would have still started at the 4 even with him on board. I never expected us to run two legit bigs so maybe that's why I haven't been in panic mode about our frontcourt recruiting. If any of the "projects" turn out to be good defenders that can stay on the floor, I think we're okay. Our ceiling is limited without a proven guy but I completely disagree that we have a lot of holes in our roster.
 
#1,486      

illinifaninwi

DeForest, Wisconsin
This board is hilarious. I liked Bruan, but Kipper would have still started at the 4 even with him on board. I never expected us to run two legit bigs so maybe that's why I haven't been in panic mode about our frontcourt recruiting. If any of the "projects" turn out to be good defenders that can stay on the floor, I think we're okay. Our ceiling is limited without a proven guy but I completely disagree that we have a lot of holes in our roster.

I need a break from recruiting. I should know better after coaching high school baseball for nine years. Never try to predict what 15-18 year-olds will do, even 10 minutes in the future.
 
#1,487      
"Fall recruiting"? No such thing. There is 2019 recruiting, 2020 recruiting and so on. We did very well on this incoming class. It's completely irrelevant when the players committed. Would Tevian Jones or any other player be better if he/they committed in the fall instead of the spring? No.

There is a tremendous difference and actually that is why there is a fall signing period. The majority of recruits commit and sign in the Fall. From the rest, there are always some top recruits who will wait, primarily driven by either shoe company wars or more likely, waiting to see how the roster of some blue bloods and top schools end up after the season when some players declare for the draft. Those top recruits usually end up at those schools.

The pool of the rest of highly ranked recruits tremendously shrinks after Fall, there is a much smaller pool, and schools with huge gaps (like Illinois the last several years) often end up scrambling to find some 5th year guys who can help, or forced to take chances with "projects." It is a clear indication that your main recruiting strategy is not working, and has been happening for several years now.
 
#1,488      

mhuml32

Cincinnati, OH
Everybody panic we lost an unranked longshot redshirt-needing lanky 12 ppg prospect. Underwood is totally failing.


The panic isn't because they lost a great prospect. The panic is because what it potentially represents.
 
#1,489      

illinifaninwi

DeForest, Wisconsin
+1, Mom said, boy, you go to mizznoz, Mark Smith will show you how it's done. All the great players want Clownzo to coach them. Moving on.;):illinois:

This recruitment is pretty clear. Mom went to Mizzou - God only knows why. Cuonzo offered grayshirt opportunity (pay first year and then scholarship). Braun will sit first year and be recruited over. Braun will transfer to UMKC and average 3 points per game as a senior for the Kangaroos.

In Underwood I trust, hopefully. Oh come on we're due to win again!
 
#1,490      

Deleted member 29907

D
Guest
This recruitment is pretty clear. Mom went to Mizzou - God only knows why. Cuonzo offered grayshirt opportunity (pay first year and then scholarship). Braun will sit first year and be recruited over. Braun will transfer to UMKC and average 3 points per game as a senior for the Kangaroos.

In Underwood I trust, hopefully. Oh come on we're due to win again!


+1 - nothing to see here folks - move along. Its not like we were on this guy for the last 3 years for crying out loud.
 
#1,491      
This board is hilarious. I liked Bruan, but Kipper would have still started at the 4 even with him on board. I never expected us to run two legit bigs so maybe that's why I haven't been in panic mode about our frontcourt recruiting. If any of the "projects" turn out to be good defenders that can stay on the floor, I think we're okay. Our ceiling is limited without a proven guy but I completely disagree that we have a lot of holes in our roster.

Most independent college basketball analysts will disagree, however, with this assessment (given current roster with no significant additions). They will definitely not pick us to make the tournament (which we desperately need), so that means they see gaps in our roster.

It does not mean that this team can't surprise and overachieve, although that would not be a unique attribute to Illinois. Bottom line is that in order to build a consistent competitor in the B1G, you need a team that is consistently "expected" to make the tournament (not just by Illini fans) rather than the occasional overachievement or underachievement.
 
#1,492      

Govoner Vaugn Fan

New Orleans
I am more than happy with the spring signings. The pool of talent is smaller in the spring and it would have been great to fill all the slots last fall when a lot more good players were in the pool, but remember last fall no one knew we would have four transfers this spring. Hard to sign replacements in the fall for players you don't know will leave.
 
#1,493      

Peoria Illini

Peoria, IL
There is a tremendous difference and actually that is why there is a fall signing period. The majority of recruits commit and sign in the Fall. From the rest, there are always some top recruits who will wait, primarily driven by either shoe company wars or more likely, waiting to see how the roster of some blue bloods and top schools end up after the season when some players declare for the draft. Those top recruits usually end up at those schools.

The pool of the rest of highly ranked recruits tremendously shrinks after Fall, there is a much smaller pool, and schools with huge gaps (like Illinois the last several years) often end up scrambling to find some 5th year guys who can help, or forced to take chances with "projects." It is a clear indication that your main recruiting strategy is not working, and has been happening for several years now.

Not quite fair to lump 1 full recruiting cycle at Illinois for Underwood with the "recruiting strategy" of several years with his predecessors. He got his main guy in the fall in Ayo, which is a pretty great get for being on the job for all of 6 months or so, and trying to fix a program and instill a new culture in the program. Our class next fall will be better and we will continue to grow this program.

Lots of reasons why recruits go to different schools. If they don't want to be hear, so be it. Good luck to wherever they land. Move on to the next guy.
 
#1,494      
I am more than happy with the spring signings. The pool of talent is smaller in the spring and it would have been great to fill all the slots last fall when a lot more good players were in the pool, but remember last fall no one knew we would have four transfers this spring. Hard to sign replacements in the fall for players you don't know will leave.

Sure, Spring recruiting is far more difficult, but we still only filled only one out of the 3 available scholarships in the Fall and we had gaps to begin with. Furthermore, some added attrition was expected and unavoidable (not all 4) which by default would have added more pressure in the Spring. There will definitely be defections next year as well, no doubt.
 
#1,495      
Not quite fair to lump 1 full recruiting cycle at Illinois for Underwood with the "recruiting strategy" of several years with his predecessors. He got his main guy in the fall in Ayo, which is a pretty great get for being on the job for all of 6 months or so, and trying to fix a program and instill a new culture in the program. Our class next fall will be better and we will continue to grow this program.

Lots of reasons why recruits go to different schools. If they don't want to be hear, so be it. Good luck to wherever they land. Move on to the next guy.

I never said that BU has the same blame in Fall recruiting, and never assigned him the same responsibility on how we got here. As I said, it was a failing recruiting strategy for years now. However, I am not giving him a pass and saying that BU has done great recruiting (or even coaching) so far. He has not, he has to pick it up.

We need a strong 2019 Fall recruiting class, beyond just depending on a single play and the MIF/Chin connection for better recruits. Last year, the main talk and optimism was on the additions of Liddell and Okoro. Now Okoro has gone elsewhere and there are major clouds with Liddell and much of the recruiting optimism resides with getting just every better recruit from MIF (mainly Whitney and Miller)... a single play/source. Personally, I love the MIF connection despite the criticism that many on this bothe MIF's best interest to send all top prospects to UI moving forward, so I have doubts it happens.
 
#1,497      
Most independent college basketball analysts will disagree, however, with this assessment (given current roster with no significant additions). They will definitely not pick us to make the tournament (which we desperately need), so that means they see gaps in our roster.

It does not mean that this team can't surprise and overachieve, although that would not be a unique attribute to Illinois. Bottom line is that in order to build a consistent competitor in the B1G, you need a team that is consistently "expected" to make the tournament (not just by Illini fans) rather than the occasional overachievement or underachievement.
I expect us to be a tourney team the following year so call it a talent gap, youth, whatever but I think fans would find the next few years more enjoyable if they can be satisfied with growth. If we do worse this year than I woudlnt blame them on giving up though.
 
#1,499      
So you think Jones, a 4* recruit, and Griffin are projects. Interesting view. Do you have a link or statistics to back up your claim that most recruits sign in the early signing period? BTW, I'll take Kane over the two bigs, Castleton and the Chicago kid that went to Ia. St as a legacy.

I never said that every player Illinois got is a project, so not sure where you got that. That is not for previous staff as well. But as someone else posted, when the average ranking of a recruit ranks as 10th in the B1G, that means that we do have quite a few projects (lower ranked recruits).
 
#1,500      
I expect us to be a tourney team the following year so call it a talent gap, youth, whatever but I think fans would find the next few years more enjoyable if they can be satisfied with growth.

I do not disagree with that view, not different than mine actually. But saying we have a "talent gap, youth, whatever" and saying " I completely disagree that we have a lot of holes in our roster" are kind of contradictory. If you say that we have a talent gap, youth gap, or whatever other gap, we do indeed have holes in our roster.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.