Peoria Illini
- Peoria, IL
Big Ten will have a record number of RSCI BB recruits in the 2018 class--18. UI has just the 1--Ayo.
Spread over 9 schools:
MD, MSU, Mich - 3
IU, OSU, NU - 2
UI, MN, Iowa - 1
Top 50
MD - 2
UI, IU, Iowa, MN - 1
Big Ten will have a record number of RSCI BB recruits in the 2018 class--18. UI has just the 1--Ayo.
Big Ten will have a record number of RSCI BB recruits in the 2018 class--18. UI has just the 1--Ayo.
Interesting statement considering all of our wins, NCAA wins and Final 4s in basketball. Pretty sure we are in the top 12 or so all time in position in the AP poll. Not sure your statement could be more wrong about the basketball program's past.
I hardly think it would be a "waste". Once again, staff apparently identified him as someone who might provide a valuable contribution to the program. You obviously see something in him that they're missing. I'd suggest an email the next time they're missing on out your insight, just in case they aren't monitoring the program.
Every other person on this board wishes, like you, that we had gotten one of our top choices in the fall. We didn't. That is the new reality. Most everyone, except a select few, is looking at how the staff is approaching this and is largely satisfied.
Many of us see progress. We think this class is a big step in the right direction.
The expectations will be higher for me and probably most others as the coaching staff gets settled in.
Obviously you wanted to just use the past decade or so, since that fits your meme.
I was just responding to somebody else's framing broseph. Not my words.
Feels like I'm one of the only ones left with any expectations for this program some of the time, frankly.
The point was that they didn't list him as committed to anyone, not his ranking.
Are you serious?
I looked up fouling on the NCAA website and it's worse than I imagined. We were horrific. Fouls per game is listed over the course of 8 pages. Why 8? Because there are 351 D1 teams, and at 50 per page, all but one team fits on pages 1-7. The lone team at the bottom is listed on page 8.
It's Illinois.
22.5 per game! I don't think we've been remotely close to that in my lifetime. That's an average of putting teams in the bonus and double-bonus every game. To put it in a little more perspective, Milwaukee was 74th, and we still had 6 more PFs/game. That's giving teams a major advantage with so many extra trips to line, to say nothing of the issues that arise managing your roster as your guys get into foul trouble. On top of that, players are aware of their foul situation and it affects individual play. You can't possibly be successful with that much fouling.
I'm not sure that was true for our guys. They seemed to continue to foul with abandon regardless of the number already in the bag.
Great, let's go win some ballgames
Spread over 9 schools:
MD, MSU, Mich - 3
IU, OSU, NU - 2
UI, MN, Iowa - 1
Top 50
MD - 2
UI, IU, Iowa, MN - 1
You replied to a post about Braun contributing in two years and suggested that was a waste. I'm not sure what you're getting at.
To me the biggest waste is to let scholarships sit empty. Not saying they will end up unused, but that is the reason the Braun situation is so frustrating. Maybe it's only a 25% chance he works out, but it's a zero % chance if we can't fill it. Each time we missed in the last 6 weeks the odds moved further against us. And it is our most pressing need at this point.
So no, Braun was not the difference maker for next year. He was possibly an important piece in a year or two. It now appears we will still be waiting on that guy in another year.
To me the biggest waste is to let scholarships sit empty. Not saying they will end up unused, but that is the reason the Braun situation is so frustrating. Maybe it's only a 25% chance he works out, but it's a zero % chance if we can't fill it. Each time we missed in the last 6 weeks the odds moved further against us. And it is our most pressing need at this point.
So no, Braun was not the difference maker for next year. He was possibly an important piece in a year or two. It now appears we will still be waiting on that guy in another year.
I understand a little more where you're coming from. I guess I'd assume that one of the three bigs coming in would go the way of Matic.
With Okoro gone, I don't expect us to land a big of any great consequence until we show improvement on the court, which probably means more of the same in the coming year.
The Okoro sting will linger , it would have made a difference next year, but not sure he will play till 2019. There might be a big out there lurking, unless BU has a lab out back of Ubben and he is building one, not sure where he's at !I understand a little more where you're coming from. I guess I'd assume that one of the three bigs coming in would go the way of Matic.
With Okoro gone, I don't expect us to land a big of any great consequence until we show improvement on the court, which probably means more of the same in the coming year.
The Okoro sting will linger , it would have made a difference next year, but not sure he will play till 2019. There might be a big out there lurking, unless BU has a lab out back of Ubben and he is building one, not sure where he's at !
Focus on Whitney commit , we get that find a big!
I think we are all getting overwrought about what currently stands as likely the 4th option at center. Let's just throw caution to the wind and say that Ebo actually improves from his performance the later part of the year. Does 15-20 minutes, 5 pts, 5 rebounds sound unreasonable? Some here are saying they expect Kane to be starting by B1G game #1. Great! That means he's playing better then Ebo! There's another 15-20 mpg, 3-5pts, and a handful of rebounds. Beni gets the 5 minutes leftover and provides nothing but 5 fouls and a breather for Ebo and Kane. Thats 40 minutes, say 8 pts and 8 rebounds. Will that not work for us? I think it will. What did we get from the position last year? I am too lazy to look. I personally believe the cumulative stats for the other 4 positions will be improved upon from last year. Is it ideal? No. But can we win with that sort of production from the Center position. I think so. Defensively, I thought Ebo did well in his limited minutes. A few more pounds, a lot more strength, familiarity with the system, and there is likely improvement in his defense. Kane? 7 footer, that alone will make him make a difference...
Yeah....and I didn't realize his mother, aunt and uncle all played for Mizzou. Significant ties drew him.I guess I missed the fact that Braun was "walking on" at misery...
I guess I missed the fact that Braun was "walking on" at misery...