So no Mulcahy, possibly won’t have Harmon, Reeves may go elsewhere, and it’s pg by committee for next year. I’ll support the team regardless but Underwood’s seat is warming up if this doesn’t work.
I think they really wanted RayJ. I have not heard or read any sour grapes regarding him.
Sounds like Mulcahey isn't at all interested. Why waste time pursuing him? That is not sour grapes.
I don't understand the interest in Reeves, don't see the need, they have Shannon, Damask, Goode.
I don't understand sleeping on Moretti; if that is what is happening.
Wondering what's up with Harmon.
Is this strike 2, 3, 4, or 5 to the future of Daddy Brad?Imo terrible move by staff to not go after Paul. Fits what we need way more than Reeves.
This is MIND blowing. Clearly they didn't learn from the Ray J situation. I just can't comprehend not putting all the stops out to get either Reeves or Paul.Imo terrible move by staff to not go after Paul. Fits what we need way more than Reeves.
Almost nobody pushed Sergio around on the court. I remember his Senior year some publication did one of those articles where they ask the conference players who's best at this and that. When they asked who was the strongest player in the BIG, Sergio got the most mentions.GMAB. People here have Rodgers as a lottery pick if he can learn to shoot. He is a 7/8 guy on a good team at best right now.
Sergio would not have allowed Pickett and Perkins and a host of others to abuse us I can tell you that, and he could shoot beyond 3 feet.
And Flashbacks of Sergio trying to play PG. Sergio was definitely one of our five best players and furthermore he was way closer to a PG than Ty.On one hand, I think Ty at PG gets our best five on the floor, which is great.
On the other hand, I’m already having flashbacks of Jaylon Tate dribbling at the three point line wondering why there was no defender within 15 feet of him.
He was much closer to a PG skills-wise than Ty. And it was still ugly when we tried to play him at there.Sergio, at PG, was not "a much better version of Rodgers"
Or have skillsets completely unfit for the position (Ty).Why would you hate a kid that we apparently are not pursuing?
I think this staff needs to get their act together here.
The guys we bring in who are point guards are either too small or hurt or ineligible.
If we are in the middle of another mediocre B1G season in January, I think we'll point to this as the pear-shaped moment.This is MIND blowing. Clearly they didn't learn from the Ray J situation. I just can't comprehend not putting all the stops out to get either Reeves or Paul.
Playing like a man among boys.
I don't feel the returnees are "bad" options but certainly not ideal. As far as what Harmon or DGL we have no idea what they may or may not be. It certainly isn't ideal but it may be fine. I still hope we add another and with more shooters and experience it should improve. Hopefully Williams will be good to go. If so we should be fine. I still hope we add someone.He was much closer to a PG skills-wise than Ty. And it was still ugly when we tried to play him at there.
Anyway, OP said PG by committee of Sencire, Ty, DGL, and Shannon. IMO they are all bad options. This is if Williams not ready.
I'm 100% with you on this one. Absolutely maddening.Imo terrible move by staff to not go after Paul. Fits what we need way more than Reeves.
Imo terrible move by staff to not go after Paul. Fits what we need way more than Reeves.
This does make sense...felt like a major longshot from the get-go. But, man, you still have to give it a shot. Crazy!Also they don’t think Paul is going to go anywhere inside the conference.
GMAB. People here have Rodgers as a lottery pick if he can learn to shoot. He is a 7/8 guy on a good team at best right now.
Sergio would not have allowed Pickett and Perkins and a host of others to abuse us I can tell you that, and he could shoot beyond 3 feet.
“It was probably futile anyway”Imo terrible move by staff to not go after Paul. Fits what we need way more than Reeves.
uh...noIs this strike 2, 3, 4, or 5 to the future of Daddy Brad?
we didn't reach out to Mulcahy or we did and he said nope? huge difference
Well they didn’t just assume this with PM….also reeves will become available. He’s enrolled at ISU for online summer classes.
These seem a bit contradictory?Imo terrible move by staff to not go after Paul. Fits what we need way more than Reeves.
I’m just saying I would do whatever I could to get Paul. Even if he was apprehensive at first. I’d make it really hard for him to say no to us.These seem a bit contradictory?
Wow, never seen Bert this dapper before!“It was probably futile anyway”
I am 100% behind this, how many other supporters are for this?I’m just saying I would do whatever I could to get Paul. Even if he was apprehensive at first. I’d make it really hard for him to say no to us.
Yeah, got it. Check back with me when this team gets a one seed and makes an Elite Eight.this will age well
Sports is a tough business, the more you win, the higher the expectation. Saying you are better than complete irrelevance will only get you so far. Not saying Brad should be fired, but the people that are paying him have higher expectations than just making the tournament.Wow, never seen Bert this dapper before!
Seriously, I get that this is a disappointing offseason PG search thus far, but some of the talk in this thread about Brad's seat warming up and strike 3, etc. if he just makes the tournament again is still kind of mind boggling to me. I remember where we were prior to BU and, personally, I'm not ready to go back there again. Still hoping the tournament every year is BU's floor and with the right matchups/luck we can make some noise one of these years.