So, it's Nick Martinelli, right?pretty sure it's Cooper Flagg
So, it's Nick Martinelli, right?pretty sure it's Cooper Flagg
Probably wouldn't help Kofi's case that he didn't exhaust his eligibility before leaving on his own accord.Well damn,,,,let's bring Kofi back for another year
Is it "pimping your kid" to want them to make money and be secure in life? Is me sending my kid to a STEM camp this summer, on the off chance it'll spark an interest in becoming an engineer or doctor down the road also me "pimping my kid?" If my kid asks me for career advice one day and I convince him to leave his current job for a new one that pays more, did I just "pimp my kid?" Man, the way some of you all talk about these players is wild.But, but, but we were told it's still EARLY! Kidding aside, it feels like this is the case. What a system; tampering, back channeling, however you label it. Agents and parents pimping their kids for the highest offer. These are the scenarios everybody saw coming when the "NIL" came to fruition. Unsustainable. The fan experience has already been obliterated, and they are the economic driver of the system.
Name, image, likeness was not sold as pay to play. But that is exactly what it is.
Can you give us any positives? Cause it seems like we are putting all our eggs in the basket of Sarr/Riley and possibly getting neither if we wait to long on Riley and he goes pro.With all of the backchanneling that's gone on this year by agents, the portal process is accelerated. Kids hitting the portal already have idea of what schools they will look at. So, last year's roster building timeline doesn't really mean all that much.
Illinois Reaches Out to Veteran Sharpshooter Currently in Transfer Portal
![]()
Brendan Hausen Career Stats - NCAAM - ESPN
Complete career NCAAM stats for the Iowa Hawkeyes Guard Brendan Hausen on ESPN. Includes points, rebounds, and assists.www.espn.com
They have a lot of money left. They will spend it, let it play out. We have way more of a roster at this point than we did last year.
So are we behind in panicking, or do we still have plenty of time for that?With all of the backchanneling that's gone on this year by agents, the portal process is accelerated. Kids hitting the portal already have idea of what schools they will look at. So, last year's roster building timeline doesn't really mean all that much.
He would be a piece potentially and maybe he could be the backup guard, but he's only a shooter, 80% of his shots are from three, doesn't rebound, get steals, set up teammates, he's just on the court to shoot. He's a 6'4 Ben Humrichous. And he's the 11th best SG available in the portal right now, to show how thin the pot has gotten.Illinois Reaches Out to Veteran Sharpshooter Currently in Transfer Portal
![]()
Brendan Hausen Career Stats - NCAAM - ESPN
Complete career NCAAM stats for the Iowa Hawkeyes Guard Brendan Hausen on ESPN. Includes points, rebounds, and assists.www.espn.com
Correct. Actor David Kent as Bill Scott, according to IMDB. I'm sure Ward was playing golf that afternoon with Fred Rutherford.Wally, Lumpy, Beaver, Eddie Haskell, Bill Scott
My argument is not that it isn't right. We would all do the same to try to maximize the benefit to our child. That is not my point. My point is, the current model is not sustainable. Fans will become disinterested in college basketball eventually and stop contributing money to it. It is already happening. At some point, the only interest will be from family of players and those who gamble on sports. The pie will begin shrinking, and "NIL" payments are soon to follow. I'm just playing out the scenario here. The money will eventually not be there to pay these guys millions of dollars. Plain and simple, IMO. The long term prospects for college sports are not good as a direct result of having no system in place. I'm all for the free market, more so than many, but a wild west with no system in place will not last.Is it "pimping your kid" to want them to make money and be secure in life? Is me sending my kid to a STEM camp this summer, on the off chance it'll spark an interest in becoming an engineer or doctor down the road also me "pimping my kid?" If my kid asks me for career advice one day and I convince him to leave his current job for a new one that pays more, did I just "pimp my kid?" Man, the way some of you all talk about these players is wild.
How’s his handles and his defense?He would be a piece potentially and maybe he could be the backup guard, but he's only a shooter, 80% of his shots are from three, doesn't rebound, get steals, set up teammates, he's just on the court to shoot. He's a 6'4 Ben Humrichous. And he's the 11th best SG available in the portal right now, to show how thin the pot has gotten.
Until he proves otherwise, Ty is a 4. Last we saw him he didn't remotely have the skills you'd want a 2 or 3 to have. Maybe he's developed those skills in the past year. That would be great.I think that 6'8"/6'9", 250-255 pound, 19-year-old Montenegrin Forward David Mirkovic is a great addition to the Illini. I hope that he can be with the team for at least two years. If he works hard with Fletch, I could see him adding to his strength, improving his quickness, and increasing his vertical. He has a very good 3-point shot, but he seems very slow getting his shot off. D-1 defenders will close out on him very quickly on 3s, and I have my doubts that Mirkovic (at least now) will be able to drive to the hoop past those defenders. And I really worry that Mirkovic will (for now) not be able to guard quicker opponents in our man-to-man defense. So, as of right now, I would expect Mirkovic to start this coming season at PF, but I think that is far less than optimal for the Illini. (And BTW, Ty Rodgers, to me, is not really a 4, a starting PF, at 6'6", without a proven [yet] outside shot.) I think that the Illini might want to consider recruiting a starting PF (doesn't need to be a star) via the transfer portal.
Here are four examples of possible transfer 4s via the portal:
Sophomore Malique Ewin of Florida State, 6'11", 230 pounds, 14.2/7.6/1.7 averages, and 59.6/0.0/65.3 shooting.
Junior KeShawn Murphy of Mississippi State, 6'10", 230 pounds, 11.7/7.4/1.6 averages, and 56.6/14.8/61.9 shooting.
Sophomore Alvaro Folgueiras of Robert Morris, 6'9", 215 pounds, 14.1/9.1/3.2 averages, and 54.8/41.3/78.4 shooting.
Junior JaMichael Stillwell of Milwaukee, 6'8", 225 pounds, 13.0/10.7/1.4 averages, and 46.8/28.6/56.2 shooting.
IMHO, any one of these 4 proven players would be better (this season) as the starting PF than David Mirkovic. I would just hope that one of these 4 would be an "affordable" transfer option for the Illini.
Seems obvious that you should probably define "for our lifetimes."College sports have (for our lifetimes) been about who is getting the most money. Like any other sport, having the most money doesn't guarantee success, but it does make it more likely. So if you want to be a fan of a winning team, you give the team money.
Zero reason to panic.So are we behind in panicking, or do we still have plenty of time for that?
My argument is not that it isn't right. We would all do the same to try to maximize the benefit to our child. That is not my point. My point is, the current model is not sustainable. Fans will become disinterested in college basketball eventually and stop contributing money to it. It is already happening. At some point, the only interest will be from family of players and those who gamble on sports. The pie is shrinking, and "NIL" payments are soon to follow. I'm just playing out the scenario here. The money will eventually not be there to pay these guys millions of dollars. Plain and simple, IMO. The long term prospects for college sports are not good as a direct result of having no system in place. I'm all for the free market, more so than many, but a wild west with no system in place will not last.
Eddie HaskellWally, Lumpy, Beaver, Ward, ????
I estimate since around at least 1960 this has been true, so most still-living lifetimes at this point. (The slush fund scandal started 1962 and that idea doesn't just come out of nowhere.)Seems obvious that you should probably define "for our lifetimes."
- for 3 year olds on Illinois Loyalty, yeah you're probably right about the $$$$
- for 83 year olds, not so much
What is the plan if we wait on Will/Dame and we end up with neither? Last year we pivoted to European players, but we have already taken one and FL_8905 said we have money set aside for the other.Zero reason to panic.
A name like Panic would fit nicely on the rosterZero reason to panic.