There are more than a few people in this thread who don't seem to be sold on Vaaks.
A real bunch of anti-Vaaksers, they are.
There are more than a few people in this thread who don't seem to be sold on Vaaks.
A real bunch of anti-Vaaksers, they are.
Heard some talk of his "fit" into Illini, seems we backed away from him.That guy is the single most unpredictable prospect I've ever heard of. He was at a couple big time prep schools in the US and decided to go play pro ball in Serbia. I think he thought he'd play a year over there and then get drafted. Didn't work out. He barely played because the coach said he didn't understand the tactics of team basketball. In February he left that team to come back to the US. Who knows what he does next. Seems like a major head case. Obviously super talented but don't think I'd want that in our locker room.
Vaaks will see a much greater step up in competition. Agree, the transfer players for the most part has seen 3pt% make gone down. Not sure why, great looks and plenty of practice.I'm not saying this won't happen, but generally the 3-point percentages of guys coming from other programs have not gone up at Illinois besides Jake. Ben, KB, AS, and Z are all down from their previous stops. I don't know if there's a reason, but now I'll wait for AirTran to tell me how evil I am for pointing this out.
Sure, but it’s good to get greedy.I would really, really be cautious in thinking this is anywhere near a lock. You've been around long enough to know that things can and more often do go sideways. When talking about money, it's amazing how programs come up with additional out of nowhere.
LolSo:
We scored 1.249 points per possession. We had 65.7 possessions per 40 minutes.
So, we scored 82.0593 points per 40 minutes.
We played 37 games this season.
82.0593 * 37 = about 3,036.194 points scored total IF each game were 40 minutes.
But, each game was not 40 minutes. We played 4 overtime games this year (MSU, UCLA, Wisconsin, Wisconsin) which means we played:
(40 * 37) + 20 =1,500 played minutes on the season.
IF each game were 40 minutes, we would have played 1480 minutes.
So:
(3,036.194 / 1480) * 1500 = 3077.2236 (rounded to 4 decimal places)
3077.2236 / 37 =
View attachment 49591
On the season, Illinois is listed to have scored this many points per game:
View attachment 49592
So there’s the super complicated method of finding out points per game.
Yes, you could obviously use total points scored divided by total games played for a significantly simpler calculation - and by definition, a more correct result (or the same result).
However, this was me just trying to prove that pace and ppp are the actual data that matters.
If there's anything this board should have learned by now is that there's no such thing as a lock in recruiting until the recruit has been signed.Sure, but it’s good to get greedy.
You're sipping too much orange and blue koolaid. Duke has the #1 recruiting class coming in. You act like they haven't lost recruiting battles every year. No Duke fan would care and they'd quickly move on to the next.It would truly be a seismic shift to their psyche if they were to lose a high priority recruit to Illinois. Might not be a full blown panic but there would be that nagging fear that the foundation isn’t sturdy as in eras past.
That was Georgetown, not Providence.I like everything about him. Sure it’s a highlight reel and “bullsh*t” program BUT…
If he can excel in that system, (or lack there of) making off-balance shot after off balance shot…and being savvy enough to finish at the rack; plus the court vision. Wow, would all that translate here!
Really enthused about him.
Look, this kid maarkanen (sp?) played in Serbia and didnt fit in. Is this not expected, without a -vic in his name?Heard some talk of his "fit" into Illini, seems we backed away from him.
Well well well, looks like he can shoot better than you gave him credit for the other day. I mean... he DID shoot 40% from 3 and the NBA draft room gives him credit for his soft touch on his jumper.
Maybe Kylan replacement or Plan b for Vaaks? If he’s healthy he would be great with Blackwell.Is this the Blackwell pivot? If I remember correctly, we were in on him last year for a bit.
View attachment 49588
Where did you hear this from? The reason I ask is that the reports I get from AI search of all written content changed overnight - in the opposite direction:Heard some talk of his "fit" into Illini, seems we backed away from him.
We better get Andre back so we have a player that can guard quick opponents, or the defense could be very ugly with that starting guard combo.Personally, I’m a bit surprised by the Vaaks + Blackwell idea. I’d go for a different pairing.
But I’m not on the staff whose putting together historic offenses here recently.
There are more than a few people in this thread who don't seem to be sold on Vaaks.
A real bunch of anti-Vaaksers, they are.
When Duke is involved the term lock doesn’t even enter my thinking. To that end, I have been looking at various guys who I feel would be excellent fits should John head to Durham.I would really, really be cautious in thinking this is anywhere near a lock. You've been around long enough to know that things can and more often do go sideways. When talking about money, it's amazing how programs come up with additional out of nowhere.
Game, set, match.There are more than a few people in this thread who don't seem to be sold on Vaaks.
A real bunch of anti-Vaaksers, they are.
I think Morillo is gonna be higher than 9th in the pecking order.Assuming Vaaks will be our lead guard. If we keep him in the Keaton role, he has the ability to be an All-American. Then getting a certified bucket in Blackwell as the Kylan replacement… that’s just impossible to stop. I hate to say it, but Kylan was the one that didn’t fit with last years team. He became sort of a black hole offensively due to poor finishing at the rim and the inability to hit those floaters and middies. Remember he got one early in the UConn game and it looked so flat- feel like he hadn’t hit one of those in months… he shot 1-13 in the sweet 16 & beyond in the tournament. Assuming Drej is the starter at the 3 day 1.. how do you guard that? I think all of our presumed starters are All-Big Ten level player… I mean jeez. QC, Jake, Z & maybe a 9th guy who’s TBD or Morillo… that’s probably a national title favorite.
View attachment 49584
Illini , it's full of $$$$$$$$....................It really really is..................
Morillo can play booty ball, he bullied his way to the rim a couple times last night against elite competition.Vaaks = Booty Ball? If so, there's another option to score. Wasn't Domask 6'7?
How much would a guy like Kofi be worth in todays game??Kofi have eligibility? I’m sure some donors would pony up for that…