Seems like we just have a steady stream of top 20 recruits coming to campus. The pump is really primed to keep this thing humming at an elite level.He is 7 foot 4.
Agree 100%. What AS does is score against anyone. But he can be controlled in that regard when a team has an elite defender of his size and construct their defense to stop him from getting into the lane....in which case this Illini team will plenty of other options that open up.Andrej is not a non shooter. An example of non shooter is Ty Rodgers.
Yeah makes sense.Illinois will have a treasure trove of NIL money available next offseason, which is why you are seeing them pop up as major players for elite prospects.
Is Tomi and Z considered in their 5th year? Does the 5 for 5 not apply to them?Yeah makes sense.
Tomi and Z come off the books no matter what.
Mirk, Andrej, QC, and Vaaks could come off the books depending on the season each of them have. That's the entire top 6.
No.Is Tomi and Z considered in their 5th year? Does the 5 for 5 not apply to them?
Forget the exact rationale. But - yes - confirmed that the twins are gone after this year.Is Tomi and Z considered in their 5th year? Does the 5 for 5 not apply to them?
No insider here, but pretty sure the staff's vision for Andrej is to turn him into an NBA 1st rounder after we win the NC this season.i take the ellipsis as meaning "go pro or transfer". i suppose the staff has a vision for 2027-2028 and beyond that he wouldn't fit into?
He was bad from 3 last year but he shot 32.2% from 3 across his freshman and sophomore season on decent volume. Plus he's an 80%+ free throw shooter.Andrej is not a non shooter. An example of non shooter is Ty Rodgers.
Illinois will have a treasure trove of NIL money available next offseason, which is why you are seeing them pop up as major players for elite prospects.
They will be too oldForget the exact rationale. But - yes - confirmed that the twins are gone after this year.
That’s good because between Vaaks / QC / Andrej / Mirk — we need to get a few to stay.Illinois will have a treasure trove of NIL money available next offseason, which is why you are seeing them pop up as major players for elite prospects.
I’d assume if he comes back to college he won’t be at Illinois.He will have himself a similar decision to what Milan had this year ...
Illinois will have a treasure trove of NIL money available next offseason, which is why you are seeing them pop up as major players for elite prospects.
They were born August 2003. Their clock woul begin the 2022-2023 season because of their 19th birthday. They get 5 years and this would be the fifth.Forget the exact rationale. But - yes - confirmed that the twins are gone after this year.
Future lawsuits pending, of course.They were born August 2003. Their clock woul begin the 2022-2023 season because of their 19th birthday. They get 5 years and this would be the fifth.
Their ageForget the exact rationale. But - yes - confirmed that the twins are gone after this year.
Theirs seems like the least likely situation to succeed. Former pros that were given eligibility consistent with 5 for 5 e.g., Tomas was playing in the Adriatic league when he otherwise would have been a frosh.Future lawsuits pending, of course.
I think Tomi could have a legitimate lawsuit -- not that he would pursue it necessarily. Remember, when he enrolled, the NCAA arbitrarily said he was a Sophomore, negating his freshman season. A reasonable argument could be made that he was unfairly denied a full season long before 5 for 5 came into play. The NCAA hasn't had a good track record in court of late with its arbitrary rulings.Theirs seems like the least likely situation to succeed. Former pros that were given eligibility consistent with 5 for 5 e.g., Tomas was playing in the Adriatic league when he otherwise would have been a frosh.
The guys that weren't given a 5th year because they were already Sr's will undoubtedly win, but those go away afte next season.
Yes bc he only gets 3 when peers get 5.I think Tomi could have a legitimate lawsuit -- not that he would pursue it necessarily. Remember, when he enrolled, the NCAA arbitrarily said he was a Sophomore, negating his freshman season. A reasonable argument could be made that he was unfairly denied a full season long before 5 for 5 came into play. The NCAA hasn't had a good track record in court of late with its arbitrary rulings.