Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#527      
I think the price we’re talking about will become much more realistic next year because the market will continue to go up. Andrej will also have a better year than many here are currently thinking.
 
#529      
Andrej is not a non shooter. An example of non shooter is Ty Rodgers.
Agree 100%. What AS does is score against anyone. But he can be controlled in that regard when a team has an elite defender of his size and construct their defense to stop him from getting into the lane....in which case this Illini team will plenty of other options that open up.

He is elite at getting the ball in the basket inside 8 ft. and likely the best in college hoops. If he can shoot >33% from the arc, he will likely be All-B1G at a min. and maybe an AA. He also needs to be more aware of what is going on around him relative to when he gets doubled.

But the bottom line is we are lucky to have him and hope he has a healthy and productive season. He certainly has some elite skills and a high ceiling.
 
#531      
Illinois will have a treasure trove of NIL money available next offseason, which is why you are seeing them pop up as major players for elite prospects.
Yeah makes sense.

Tomi and Z come off the books no matter what.

Mirk, Andrej, QC, and Vaaks could come off the books depending on the season each of them have. That's the entire top 6.
 
#532      
Yeah makes sense.

Tomi and Z come off the books no matter what.

Mirk, Andrej, QC, and Vaaks could come off the books depending on the season each of them have. That's the entire top 6.
Is Tomi and Z considered in their 5th year? Does the 5 for 5 not apply to them?
 
#538      
Illinois will have a treasure trove of NIL money available next offseason, which is why you are seeing them pop up as major players for elite prospects.
giphy.gif
 
#541      
Illinois will have a treasure trove of NIL money available next offseason, which is why you are seeing them pop up as major players for elite prospects.
That’s good because between Vaaks / QC / Andrej / Mirk — we need to get a few to stay.

We go thru this every offseason. Folks are convinced everyone’s a first round pick…. but then when it comes down to it, and guys are in that fringe first / second round range, those same folks will unanimously want them to come back.
 
#543      
Illinois will have a treasure trove of NIL money available next offseason, which is why you are seeing them pop up as major players for elite prospects.

Is this mostly due to all the money that will be freed up with departures? Or mostly due to new donations?

Understand the answer probably lies somewhere in the middle, but just wanted to confirm it’s not only because we have so many guys graduating/going pro and the actual overall budget remains the same

(Edit - appreciate all your info btw)
 
#547      
Future lawsuits pending, of course.
Theirs seems like the least likely situation to succeed. Former pros that were given eligibility consistent with 5 for 5 e.g., Tomas was playing in the Adriatic league when he otherwise would have been a frosh.

The guys that weren't given a 5th year because they were already Sr's will undoubtedly win, but those go away afte next season.
 
#548      
Theirs seems like the least likely situation to succeed. Former pros that were given eligibility consistent with 5 for 5 e.g., Tomas was playing in the Adriatic league when he otherwise would have been a frosh.

The guys that weren't given a 5th year because they were already Sr's will undoubtedly win, but those go away afte next season.
I think Tomi could have a legitimate lawsuit -- not that he would pursue it necessarily. Remember, when he enrolled, the NCAA arbitrarily said he was a Sophomore, negating his freshman season. A reasonable argument could be made that he was unfairly denied a full season long before 5 for 5 came into play. The NCAA hasn't had a good track record in court of late with its arbitrary rulings.
 
#549      

Hadn't seen this posted here yet...


When you look at our 2026-27 class, it's insane to think about what we could be losing off of this roster following this season, to what we could be gaining with 3 potential top 15 reclass options in...

1)Pettigrew
2)Betts
3)Williams

All three are top 15 in their class respectively, and all 3 are said to be looking to jump into 2027.

With Kitt and Marin already in the fold, could you imagine what a reload could look like if we landed Bowman, plus somehow got Betts and Pettigrew to jump up a class and join them in 27?

Betts would likely reclass to play 2 years in college and then jump to the NBA, & I think Brady may be looking to do the same thing (but I can't remember if he's turns 17 this year or next, which would determine when he's eligible to jump to the league if I recall the rule correctly)...

Guards like Pettigrew and Bowman could compliment each other nicely, replacing Vaaks and Coleman.

Then if Luigi Suigo doesn't go pro you could possibly nab him in the portal and have two 7'4 guys who can shoot replacing the exact spots the Ivic twins hold right now.

This is all a dream scenario of course, and I haven't even mentioned AJ Williams and if we somehow become players there...

But the main thing is that it looks like we are going from #TheRetention to the five-star #Reload with all the 5 star attention we are getting from 2027 & '28 classes.

This is certainly different times we are living in for our Beloved basketball program 🏀👏🏽👏🏽
 
Last edited:
#550      
I think Tomi could have a legitimate lawsuit -- not that he would pursue it necessarily. Remember, when he enrolled, the NCAA arbitrarily said he was a Sophomore, negating his freshman season. A reasonable argument could be made that he was unfairly denied a full season long before 5 for 5 came into play. The NCAA hasn't had a good track record in court of late with its arbitrary rulings.
Yes bc he only gets 3 when peers get 5.

But the sticky part is the age.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back