No.Is Tomi and Z considered in their 5th year? Does the 5 for 5 not apply to them?
No.Is Tomi and Z considered in their 5th year? Does the 5 for 5 not apply to them?
Forget the exact rationale. But - yes - confirmed that the twins are gone after this year.Is Tomi and Z considered in their 5th year? Does the 5 for 5 not apply to them?
No insider here, but pretty sure the staff's vision for Andrej is to turn him into an NBA 1st rounder after we win the NC this season.i take the ellipsis as meaning "go pro or transfer". i suppose the staff has a vision for 2027-2028 and beyond that he wouldn't fit into?
He was bad from 3 last year but he shot 32.2% from 3 across his freshman and sophomore season on decent volume. Plus he's an 80%+ free throw shooter.Andrej is not a non shooter. An example of non shooter is Ty Rodgers.
Illinois will have a treasure trove of NIL money available next offseason, which is why you are seeing them pop up as major players for elite prospects.
That’s good because between Vaaks / QC / Andrej / Mirk — we need to get a few to stay.Illinois will have a treasure trove of NIL money available next offseason, which is why you are seeing them pop up as major players for elite prospects.
Illinois will have a treasure trove of NIL money available next offseason, which is why you are seeing them pop up as major players for elite prospects.
They were born August 2003. Their clock woul begin the 2022-2023 season because of their 19th birthday. They get 5 years and this would be the fifth.Forget the exact rationale. But - yes - confirmed that the twins are gone after this year.
Future lawsuits pending, of course.They were born August 2003. Their clock woul begin the 2022-2023 season because of their 19th birthday. They get 5 years and this would be the fifth.
Their ageForget the exact rationale. But - yes - confirmed that the twins are gone after this year.
Theirs seems like the least likely situation to succeed. Former pros that were given eligibility consistent with 5 for 5 e.g., Tomas was playing in the Adriatic league when he otherwise would have been a frosh.Future lawsuits pending, of course.
I think Tomi could have a legitimate lawsuit -- not that he would pursue it necessarily. Remember, when he enrolled, the NCAA arbitrarily said he was a Sophomore, negating his freshman season. A reasonable argument could be made that he was unfairly denied a full season long before 5 for 5 came into play. The NCAA hasn't had a good track record in court of late with its arbitrary rulings.Theirs seems like the least likely situation to succeed. Former pros that were given eligibility consistent with 5 for 5 e.g., Tomas was playing in the Adriatic league when he otherwise would have been a frosh.
The guys that weren't given a 5th year because they were already Sr's will undoubtedly win, but those go away afte next season.
Yes bc he only gets 3 when peers get 5.I think Tomi could have a legitimate lawsuit -- not that he would pursue it necessarily. Remember, when he enrolled, the NCAA arbitrarily said he was a Sophomore, negating his freshman season. A reasonable argument could be made that he was unfairly denied a full season long before 5 for 5 came into play. The NCAA hasn't had a good track record in court of late with its arbitrary rulings.
"He was playing professionally when he would've otherwise been a freshman" is a pretty defensible position if Tomas is arguing on a economic basis.I think Tomi could have a legitimate lawsuit -- not that he would pursue it necessarily. Remember, when he enrolled, the NCAA arbitrarily said he was a Sophomore, negating his freshman season. A reasonable argument could be made that he was unfairly denied a full season long before 5 for 5 came into play. The NCAA hasn't had a good track record in court of late with its arbitrary rulings.
With a list like this, it seems he is likely down to 2…View attachment 50967
Normally things like this would wreck our fan base. But are these signs of good things and Denzels to come??
For sure.With a list like this, it seems he is likely down to 2…
Exciting time man.Hadn't seen this posted here yet...
When you look at our 2026-27 class, it's insane to think about what we could be losing off of this roster following this season, to what we could be gaining with 3 potential top 15 reclass options in...
1)Pettigrew
2)Betts
3)Williams
All three are top 15 in their class respectively, and all 3 are said to be looking to jump into 2027.
With Kitt and Marin already in the fold, could you imagine what a reload could look like if we landed Bowman, plus somehow got Betts and Pettigrew to jump up a class and join them in 27?
Betts would likely reclass to play 2 years in college and then jump to the NBA, & I think Brady may be looking to do the same thing (but I can't remember if he's turns 17 this year or next, which would determine when he's eligible to jump to the league if I recall the rule correctly)...
Guards like Pettigrew and Bowman could compliment each other nicely, replacing Vaaks and Coleman.
Then if Luigi Suigo doesn't go pro you could possibly nab him in the portal and have two 7'4 guys who can shoot replacing the exact spots the Ivic twins hold right now.
This is all a dream scenario of course, and I haven't even mentioned AJ Williams and if we somehow become players there...
But the main thing is that it looks like we are going from #TheRetention to the five-star #Reload with all the 5 star attention we are getting from 2027 & '28 classes.
This is certainly different times we are living in for our Beloved basketball program![]()
View attachment 50967
Normally things like this would wreck our fan base. But are these signs of good things and Denzels to come??