It will be interesting to see what Underwood's demands of effort and leadership show on both ends of the floor. It was easy to see the defensive effort lacked against PSU. But will the struggle on the offensive end be addressed. Scoring 59 against a team that lacked size shows that the two big starters along with RJ and TSJ don't seem to know or have the skills to score in the paint. Dainja can do that, but then smart coaches resort to "Hack-a-Dain" whenever he gets the ball which is exactly what I would do...without purporting to be smart. No need to double of perimeter shooters if they don't try to score at the rim which was not attempted much against PSU. Not sure if playing Alabama A & M will be a good measuring stick, but what we see against Mizzou should say a lot about what this team wants to be.
That problem to solve, along with where these guys want to establish their ceiling, will make the next couple of games very interesting. Before the season started, I addressed the challenge faced by BU in figuring out the blend of talent and rotation fits to make this group successful as a team. Fortunately, we have learned that the bench can provide scoring and defense, but other than Epps, are a weakness at the FT line. Those problems are beginning to show as opposing coaches address them. What will be telling is how and how often this team goes to the paint with the starters and if they can score inside....while getting the talented/hard working frosh to double their FT % at the least. I fully expect a good response to BU's demand for leadership and effort.