If anyone is interested, the University does have policies regarding the naming of facilities in relation to gifts. Typically the name is good for the "useful life of the facility."
I am all aboard for this donation and adding the Geis name to the stadium. The one concern I had was whether this would curtail the possibility of future big donations of the same nature, or future commercial naming rights (the one advantage the State Farm deal has is that is eventually expires and then the naming rights can be bid out again). However, the policy does allow for the addition of a second name in the event of a subsequent significant gift, and specifically mentions a facility renovation as an example (Geis-Khan Memorial Stadium anyone?).
Also there are always going to be opportunities for wealthy people to get their name on stuff. Maybe $20 million gets your name on the north goalpost?
I am all aboard for this donation and adding the Geis name to the stadium. The one concern I had was whether this would curtail the possibility of future big donations of the same nature, or future commercial naming rights (the one advantage the State Farm deal has is that is eventually expires and then the naming rights can be bid out again). However, the policy does allow for the addition of a second name in the event of a subsequent significant gift, and specifically mentions a facility renovation as an example (Geis-Khan Memorial Stadium anyone?).
Also there are always going to be opportunities for wealthy people to get their name on stuff. Maybe $20 million gets your name on the north goalpost?
Last edited: