Michigan 84, Illinois 70 Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#51      
You prioritized Ben Humrichous in 2024 (😂 😂 😂 ) and Tomislav Ivisic (😂 ) in 2025 over Morez Johnson
To be fair, Tomi is a better 3 pt shooter and spacer. Tomi has had to take a bit of a backseat for Mirkovic but this time last year, I think most people would've been fine taking Tomi over Morez given the potential we saw
 
#53      
This is the team Underwood put ogether. You can't win at a high level with these European players. NO DEFENSE AND ANO ATHLECISM. Stojavich put up good numbers on two terrible teams. Illinois is no more than a Sweet 16 team at best. Let us stop talking about them as a Final Four team, period. PITIFUL.
 
#59      
We will make it to the 1st or second weekend. Anyone who thinks we have a shot at final 4 is drinking too much orange kool aid. Just look at the stats tonight of Scums bigs versus ours. Not even remotely close..
 
#62      
You prioritized Ben Humrichous in 2024 (😂 😂 😂 ) and Tomislav Ivisic (😂 ) in 2025 over Morez Johnson

Morez was signed...Then his family got greedy..
 
#63      
I am convinced that you can still build a roster that can be one of the best offense in the country and at the same time be athletic and physical. Lol. This season and last are hampered by not having those traits which make aspects like defense poor. Hair pulling.
 
Last edited:
#64      
Our chemistry and flow early in the year looked incredible.... What happened?

Another question: Who do you "mismatch hunt" when there's no mismatch?

Do we really have the best offensive efficiency numbers in the KenPom era? Ken better change his metrics, sorry.
 
#65      
Wellllll...... If you didn't see this coming you haven't watched Michigan this year.
Mm.. I knew they were going to be tough. But I've also watched them play subpar at times this year before ultimately pulling out the win. In other to flip that script, we needed to shoot it well. We didn't.

We actually executed very well to get Cadeau his second foul early. A real dream scenario for us. But then we couldn't hit open threes or create good looks inside. And of course we aren't built to beat physical teams. Never have been. We have a good S&C program but how many times have we ever gotten guys who *play* physical basketball? Kofi is really the only guy since Brad has been here who has been truly dominant inside.
 
#66      
I was worried all year about this game. Briefly got excited about it after our stretch of big wins. But went back to being worried after the recent losses.

We held them off for awhile but we got outplayed all game. Coaches needed a better gameplan than whatever that was.

We’re trending the wrong way at the wrong time…
 
#68      
1. Don't have the athletes to defend teams that do. 2. Boswell 's shot is so broken they're sagging and it's not spreading the floor. 3. We don't play inside out enough.
Always the same every year, other super athletic teams whipe us out of the tourney.
 
#69      
We lost to a team capable of big boy basketball.

Sorry but we have a bunch of Euro 10 ply super soft guys. Good shooters until someone hits them. Wagler can’t do it alone, and he isn’t able to sell it enough for FT for some reason.


The content filter won’t allow me to describe what we are when facing a true physical team. MSU and now UM. Alabama too.

First one of those in the tourney and we’re done.
 
#70      
Wellllll...... If you didn't see this coming you haven't watched Michigan this year.
BS. You think our best effort gets us blown out at home? Absurd. We might still lose, but “seeing this coming” would have very little to do with Michigan and more to do with predicting us to come out flat in one of our biggest home games in 20 years.
 
#75      
Everything still in front of this team, but toughness is an issue for me. Credit to Michigan. They bullied out tonight. I’m shocked we don’t have one guy who would be willing to go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back