You might want to take a course in reading comprehension. Where in the world did you get that Wagler being good is a negative?Framing the Keaton diamond-in-a-rough find as a negative? Wow lol only on Illinois Loyalty, I guess.
So the reason Stojakovic is a disappointment is because he isn't better than a top 5 pick? Lmfao, okay...
The posts are about Stojakovic being a disappointment. He's disappointing because he is giving us nothing from farther than 6 ft from the hoop. And this is on a team where we jack 3s at a rate that would make Pistol Pete blush. That and the fact that he doesn't defend well, provides inconsistent value, is not working through injuries, and is not leading the team as he was expected, and is paid for are why he's a disappointment. The only way Wagler comes into this equation is because he saved this team. Don't think it was that hard to understand.
There's a new element to college basketball. If you're going to be the top paid player on the team. You are expected to be the best player.