The Sprouting Divot
Invisible and Bulletproof
- Miracle Mile
I propose that we change the name of our athletic teams to be the University of Illinois Fighting Metrics.
Sampson took over Oklahoma in 1994 the final four was in 2002 and Elite 8 in 2003, the lone second weekend before 2002 in 1999 - so we can amend it.
The Wright one going through again isn’t a great example - agreed.
Florida's losses are to Arizona, Duke, U Conn and TT. Just sayin!![]()
Nice try. This was posted in response to the incessant complaints about how a loss at home against Nebraska is unacceptable and how this season is lost because we've lost three games, all against ranked teams. Golden had a great run last season, but the start his Florida team is off to is worse than BU's start this season.
Also, two other things since we're moving so far from the original point:
1) Hiring Golden was never realistic. Miller and Beard maybe, but Golden wasn't going anywhere;
2) You know his championship at Florida doesn't go with him if he leaves right? That we don't get to raise a banner because our new coach won before he joined us? We'd have gotten the Golden that is currently 6-4 and lost at home to TCU. I think Golden is a good coach and will probably rack up other successes, but it's not a guarantee. Kevin Ollie also won a national championship. Anyone on this board clamoring to hire him? Bill Hodges took Indiana State to the National Championship game in his first season and then never even made the Tourney again. The best indicator of future success is not the result of one instance of a single-elimination tournament but the ability to get there on a consistent basis.
you were wrong twice in 2 examples that you yourself brought up, lol.
sampson's final 4 was in his 8th year. this is underwood's 9th. just give me a second weekend this year, that's what i'm looking for. (although i also am not calling for him to be fired or anything.)
I know you don't get "penalized" as much for quad 1 losses, but none of the 12 teams ahead of us have more than 1 quad 1 loss (to our 3), and there is only one sub-quad 1 loss in the top 25. I feel like a 5 or 6 seed is what we look like right now, maaaaaybe a 4.Your NET ranking isn’t used in your seeding. Instead, the committee uses NET to see who you beat and who you lost to. Mainly, how many good wins do you have (Quad1-2) and how many bad losses do you have (Quad3-4)
We’re one of just 10 teams to have 3 or more Quad1 wins and all 3 of our losses are Quad1 losses. So we currently have the ~#10 resume which is roughly equivalent to a 3 seed.
he could also mention coming out flat in the second half.... but you hit the highlightsWhat's he going to say? We are thankful that Illinois came out flat and spotted us such a big lead so we could scrape out a 3-point win??
I know I am going to talk about a different era when there were far fewer teams in the tournament. John Wooden, if I counted correctly, won his first NCAA tournament champ[ionship in his 18th year as a coach. This includes 2 years at Indiana State.Yesss. I’m staying consistent on the math for Sampson when calling this underwood's 9th season for tourney results.
I also personally don’t blame underwood for COVID.
at this point, we just don't have guys outside of kylan who want eat someones lunch on defense. and I don't expect that to change. we should try to confuse another team on defense to try and steal a few possessions by mixing up our coverage. even a gimmicky zone for a few possessions could help. I saw them try and throw it out there Saturday and it looked horrible... as some have said, half the team ran zone and the other didn't. maybe with practice it can be something to try, even for 2 minutes a game to steal 2 possessions. otherwise I don't know how to fix our defense and that's an issue. the one big advantage we have is length... need to find a way to use that on defense. because we can't keep chasing people with our slow feet and not expect people to cut us to death like uconn and Nebraska did.Seems like a few very good "metric streaks" were broken with this game.
I'll choose the optimistic route and believe that if we continue to hit those numbers (offensively) for the rest of the year, we'll win most, if not all of those games we do so. This was an outlier due to lack of defensive bite on our part, as well as lights out shooting by them.
If we do look at this from a neutral perspective however, it is quite unreasonably negative if anyone wants to believe that a bulk of our remaining opponents will continue to shoot 46.2% from 3 (and that we've consistently been THAT bad in three point defense).
As this post points out:
I'll also add our other five high major opponents' three point shooting this season:
Texas Tech: 27.3%
Alabama: 36.1%
UConn: 35.7%
Tennessee: 30%
Ohio State: 32.1%
Unless the coaching staff fully commits to playing zone defense it will not be real effective.at this point, we just don't have guys outside of kylan who want eat someones lunch on defense. and I don't expect that to change. we should try to confuse another team on defense to try and steal a few possessions by mixing up our coverage. even a gimmicky zone for a few possessions could help. I saw them try and throw it out there Saturday and it looked horrible... as some have said, half the team ran zone and the other didn't. maybe with practice it can be something to try, even for 2 minutes a game to steal 2 possessions. otherwise I don't know how to fix our defense and that's an issue. the one big advantage we have is length... need to find a way to use that on defense. because we can't keep chasing people with our slow feet and not expect people to cut us to death like uconn and Nebraska did.
I wish you were willing and I don't think they are committed. so we are back to meeting good teams score 80+ on usUnless the coaching staff fully commits to playing zone defense it will not be real effective.
Florida's losses are to Arizona, Duke, U Conn and TT. Just sayin!
Definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expect different results?Brad showing “ownership” and taking the blame only counts if he actually does something about it. But this happens repeatedly and nothing seems to change.
See post #372, page 15, within this thread by Indy Illini Fan.Here is a 1) statement, 2) a question and then a 3) comment.
1) Illinois hired Camryn Crocker to be the defensive coordinator.
2) Has anyone seen or read anything about how much control Underwood has given him?
3) The defense does not seem to be improving. Another issue is I think the players that carried over from last last year got into some bad defensive habits last year and Crocker may have a hard time breaking these habits.
What am I missing?
Thanks!See post #372 within this thread by Indy Illini Fan.
You missed their loss to national power.......TCU. Still just sayin'?Florida's losses are to Arizona, Duke, U Conn and TT. Just sayin!
I feel like this is one of the more underrated aspects of the conversation, especially since Kylan does not look nearly as dominant as he did a year ago on that end.Here is a 1) statement, 2) a question and then a 3) comment.
1) Illinois hired Camryn Crocker to be the defensive coordinator.
2) Has anyone seen or read anything about how much control Underwood has given him?
3) The defense does not seem to be improving. Another issue is I think the players that carried over from last last year got into some bad defensive habits last year and Crocker may have a hard time breaking these habits.
What am I missing?
I respectfully disagree with your first statement. Switching almost all the time can certainly work if you have the right people to do it. See Beard/Adams during their Texas Tech years. Half the coaches in America were trying to emulate them at the time. That was a pretty big coaching fad at the time.Switching consistently on defense is bad coaching- it teaches players it's ok to get beat on defense- that if it gets hard defensively- you can just put in minimal effort and pass off your guy to someone else. It's hard to stick your guy, it's hard to get through a screen, it's hard to play defense... Consistent switching is easy- but it leads to BAD defense.
Our defense is mostly the same issues as last year.. New defensive coordinator, but no changes. Honestly though, what did we expect to be different? We recruited slow footed guys, guys that aren't physically tough.. Consistent theme aside from scheme- we just don't play tough and have no identity.. That is on your head coach- you take on the identity of your coach. I appreciate Underwood is so flexible- and Werner has often complimented him for that..I somewhat agree ish.. But look at Izzo, his team and what he coaches them to do is pretty much identical to what he did 10 years ago.. They are tough, usually rebound the ball like mad men, and they play fast and get out in transition... We don't have an identity because our coach tries the new flavor of ice cream for players and scheme every other year..
It's such an indictment on Underwood that this far into the season Underwood is "having" to play Ben and Jake so much and AT THE SAME TIME. Neither of them should play meaningful minutes for a high level team- period. Do you see either of those guys playing that much time with Bama, Uconn, Tennessee?
I'm still stuck on our head coach saying it was worthless to get Tomi the ball in the paint- if you get one of your best players involved in the game- even if he isn't score- there's at least an opportunity for him to "feel himself" and grow in his confidence and intensity. Side note: Big Z has earned more playing time than Tomi at this point- and I don't think it's debatable.
We're you part of the cohort saying this same thing last year? Or perhaps the group saying this in '23?BU will figure this team out given time.
Classic stuff!!
Barnhart and Trent on the radio back your version, it was for trash talkingI was at the game and had a pretty perfect angle to see him yelling at the Nebraska player. Every player knows the expectation so that's not something a ref is going to give a warning for.