Ohio State 75, Illinois 67 POSTGAME

#126      

Deleted member 4333

D
Guest
Here's the thing, though... They actually put up 67 points in about 25 minutes! :thumb:
.
.
.
(if you ignore the stretches were they didn't score - two different slots that totaled about 15 minutes)
Is that you Tim Beckman?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
 
#127      

IlliniDent

Chicago, IL
The Ohio State game was winnable. That doesn't mean we can beat anybody in the league right now, though.

As I said.....we're competitive. But those mistakes are keeping us out of the win column against good competition. It is what it is.

Just saying- being able to beat anyone in the league does not mean you will beat anyone, just means we have the ability to, but we just keep making mistakes which kill us. We absolutely had the ability to beat OSU, we just shot ourselves in the foot
 
#128      

Deleted member 631370

D
Guest
I mean we didn't play well enough to beat Nebraska, Iowa, or Northwestern and lost to Wisconsin by 25. I also agree that we weren't very close against MSU and OSU. Teams adjusts to our pressure, we get into foul trouble, and our streaky shooting is up and down. I believe these are all related and has happened in too many games.

I know Lucas had a terrible stretch in the game but I really like the ball movement when he, Frazier, and Nichols play together. With our limited options offensively I questioned whether or not having Nichols on KBD was the smartest decision. Felt like we needed to have Kipper out there more and guarding KBD put him into foul trouble quickly.


At least with Nebraska, Iowa, Maryland, etc., we were in a position to win and just blew it. So in that sense, we did play well enough to win -- they miss one FT, and we win. Or we avoid one turnover, and we win. Stuff like that.

But these are not top-tier teams. We haven't demonstrated the ability to put ourselves in a position to beat a team like Michigan State or Purdue or even Michigan yet.
 
#129      

IlliniDent

Chicago, IL
There are signs for optimism, although I do not believe that this team has played up to par. But there have been multiple other times in recent history in previous regimes when people focused on signs, even with more optimism, and things never materialized.

In Groce's first year, when we clearly overachieved, people did mention the change of culture, especially finishing very strong, winning an NCAA game, coming a really bad call away from potentially upsetting a no. 2 seed (Miami). Even in Bruce's first years, despite the overabundance of talent, people were very optimistic, i.e., best passing team in the nation, etc. etc.

But at then end it comes down to talent. Either you get it, or the hope dies. And while the mantra of "talent has not been the problem, it is coaching" has slowly died this year, BU has to succeed on the recruiting trail for Illinois to consistently compete. Otherwise, it will be more of the same...

True but at the same time last year coaching was a huge part of the reason we lost so many games. This year, we have better coaching with significantly worse talent and it's keeping us in games.
That being said, absolutely agree, we won't see massive changes without significant changes in talent
 
#130      

Deleted member 631370

D
Guest
Just saying- being able to beat anyone in the league does not mean you will beat anyone, just means we have the ability to, but we just keep making mistakes which kill us. We absolutely had the ability to beat OSU, we just shot ourselves in the foot

Right, I agree with that. But there's a subtle difference between "have the ability to" and "playing well enough to".

I agree that we have the ability to beat anybody in the league, though the stars need to align. But I do not agree that we are playing well enough to beat Michigan State or Purdue.
 
#131      

IlliniDent

Chicago, IL
Right, I agree with that. But there's a subtle difference between "have the ability to" and "playing well enough to".

I agree that we have the ability to beat anybody in the league, though the stars need to align. But I do not agree that we are playing well enough to beat Michigan State or Purdue.

Fair, I agree with that. I do however think any of the other teams in the B1G are beatable currently
 
#132      

Deleted member 4333

D
Guest
Right, I agree with that. But there's a subtle difference between "have the ability to" and "playing well enough to".

I agree that we have the ability to beat anybody in the league, though the stars need to align. But I do not agree that we are playing well enough to beat Michigan State or Purdue.
More than a subtle difference. A big difference.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
 
#133      
The Ohio State game was winnable. That doesn't mean we can beat anybody in the league right now, though.

As I said.....we're competitive. But those mistakes are keeping us out of the win column against good competition. It is what it is.

We are massively inexperienced. Four frosh, two sophs that on;y played about 1/2 year last season and AJ, whom played very little in two years. Look at OSU, Sr. Tate, 5th year Sr Dakich, 4th year Jr. KBD, normally 5th yr Sr. Williams....they have loads of experience. Inexperience generally = mistakes, especially at key moments.
 
#135      

Hoppy2105

Little Rock, Arkansas
We are massively inexperienced. Four frosh, two sophs that on;y played about 1/2 year last season and AJ, whom played very little in two years. Look at OSU, Sr. Tate, 5th year Sr Dakich, 4th year Jr. KBD, normally 5th yr Sr. Williams....they have loads of experience. Inexperience generally = mistakes, especially at key moments.

Are we going to have to deal with KBD again next year? Or is he projected to go to the draft?
 
#138      
The game was within reach before Kipper and Black fouled out. This team is making improvements but missing the horses to finish. Hopefully BU can get a couple to come in with Ayo. If that happens, the Illini will be just fine.
 
#139      

breadman

Herndon, VA
Anybody find any tweets from KBD thanking us for making him BigTen player of the week? You are welcome, KBD, very, very , welcome, as some of us thought you would go off on us.
 
#140      

Illiini

In the land of the Nittany Lion
In the words of Al Sleet, “Inside every silver lining, there’s a dark cloud.” Hey, how many lead changes were there in the Ohio State game? Both teams had streaks. We had that one massive one, but we had that first half of the first half that made Ohio State look lost. In the second half we worked up a substantial lead. Ohio State came back from that. But over all, we played well enough to win.

Yeah, I drink the O&B Koolaid. But there are people on this forum who drink rhier
 
#141      
True but at the same time last year coaching was a huge part of the reason we lost so many games. This year, we have better coaching with significantly worse talent and it's keeping us in games.
That being said, absolutely agree, we won't see massive changes without significant changes in talent
on the Talent VS Coaching/system....always wondered:

If talent is the answer, why have guys like Holtman and BU had so much success in the Tourney with mid major talent...?
 
#143      
on the Talent VS Coaching/system....always wondered:

If talent is the answer, why have guys like Holtman and BU had so much success in the Tourney with mid major talent...?

Enough talent can get them there to compete for titles,. The coach that can get his team to play with fire once they get there makes a huge difference.
 
#144      

Hoppy2105

Little Rock, Arkansas
on the Talent VS Coaching/system....always wondered:

If talent is the answer, why have guys like Holtman and BU had so much success in the Tourney with mid major talent...?

I think they recruit underrated players to their system and "coach them up" pretty well. It works well if a solid system is in place with a good coach to run the system.

But it only takes you so far. Holtmann only made it out of the first weekend once. I don't think BU has yet to do it as a head coach. Gregg Marshall at Wichita State had an amazing final four run, but has made the sweet 16 once besides that. Archie Miller has also only made it out of the first weekend once. (an elite 8 run)

I think getting lesser players into a good system with a good coach can get you so far...but talent takes you the rest of the way. Hopefully BU can implement his system. It might take awhile...but it should work.

For reference, Tony Bennett at UVA started off slow but eventually got there. Here are his first 5 records:

15-16
16-15
22-10
23-12
30-7

Let's hope we can have an accelerated version of that.
 
#145      
I think they recruit underrated players to their system and "coach them up" pretty well. It works well if a solid system is in place with a good coach to run the system.

But it only takes you so far. Holtmann only made it out of the first weekend once. I don't think BU has yet to do it as a head coach. Gregg Marshall at Wichita State had an amazing final four run, but has made the sweet 16 once besides that. Archie Miller has also only made it out of the first weekend once. (an elite 8 run)

I think getting lesser players into a good system with a good coach can get you so far...but talent takes you the rest of the way. Hopefully BU can implement his system. It might take awhile...but it should work.

For reference, Tony Bennett at UVA started off slow but eventually got there. Here are his first 5 records:

15-16
16-15
22-10
23-12
30-7

Let's hope we can have an accelerated version of that.
SFA lost in 3rd round in 14 and 2d round in 15 and 16.
 
#146      
on the Talent VS Coaching/system....always wondered:

If talent is the answer, why have guys like Holtman and BU had so much success in the Tourney with mid major talent...?

Talent can also be relative to a system. Hence the term “system player.”

However, the more talented you are, the more systems you will fit.
 
#147      
on the Talent VS Coaching/system....always wondered:

If talent is the answer, why have guys like Holtman and BU had so much success in the Tourney with mid major talent...?

BU has won a total of 2 NCAA tourney games. Just for the record, Groce has won 3 at Ohio (one more at UI). You get a hot mid-major in the tourney, you can win a few games.

But when it comes to talent and conferences, it is all relative. You can win many conference games at SFA, you do not need HM talent, all you need is to out-talent much lesser talent level at those conferences. The same level of talent at SFA will not get you to the tournament in a P5 conference, no matter how well you coach. There, you have to have P5 level talent, because that is what the conference competition will have.