Pregame: Illinois at Indiana, Saturday, September 20th, 6:30pm CT, NBC

Status
Not open for further replies.
#451      
I disagree. Mendoza is the far more talented QB. He's very mobile and he has tremendous arm strength. CBS latest mock draft chose him as the #1 overall pick in the NFL draft. His ceiling is very high.
Mendoza stats (2023 6-7 and 2024 6-7) with CAL. Fox has him at #25 (6th QB taken) .
1758144498478.png
 
#452      
Not much to add, but I have always found it interesting how TOTALLY diametrically opposed narratives that could define a team's season can hang on the balance for a single game, lol. Saturday's result could have some fans feeling literally on top of the world or like our moment in the sun just ended depending on the result, even if neither is logical. Just a few interesting examples since Bret got here:

2022: W 9-6 vs. Iowa ... We survived this one by the skin of our teeth to move to 5-1 and finally enter the top 25! Tommy was injured, and our D outlasted a similarly elite Hawkeyes defense.
(Negative) If we lose this one, the pessimists come out in droves and declare that we only whooped Wisconsin the week before because the Badgers sucked. As soon as we got a "real test" vs. Iowa, we lost and dropped to 4-2.
(Positive) Because we won this one, we entered the following week's huge matchup with Minnesota feeling excited and eventually carried forward that momentum to reach 7-1 and a #16 ranking. We showed toughness and resilience without our starting QB and FINALLY did what it took to beat Iowa for the first time since 2008!

2022: L 24-31 vs. Purdue ... This frustrating home loss dropped us out of the top 25 and effectively killed our Big Ten West hopes.
(Negative) After a disappointing loss to MSU, we followed it up with a devastating home dud vs. Purdue to end our dreams of a Big Ten Championship Game appearance. What once looked like a truly special season while we were sitting at 7-1 after a beatdown of Nebraska in Lincoln is now looking a lot less shiny. While a huge improvement over past years, that "fairytale season" success that could catapult recruiting momentum is traded in for a "solid" 8-4.
(Positive) If we do JUST enough to beat Purdue, we right the ship, effectively clinch a spot in the Big Ten Championship Game, are cruising toward a 9-3 regular season and (most importantly) restore our fans' confidence. A letdown vs. MSU the previous week will not derail this ship, and this isn't your grandfather's Illini Football that faceplants whenever there is finally optimism!

2024: W 31-24 in OT at Nebraska ... The Illini score a top 25 road win while ranked for the first time since God-knows-when, and we move to 4-0 and #19 in the rankings.
(Negative) Sure, our top 25 win vs. KU under the lights was exciting ... but teams score upsets at home all the time, KU now looks like they were a paper tiger and we failed our first test with a ranking next to our names - Illinois still can't maintain success once there are actual expectations!
(Positive) We refused to let the KU win be a blip on the radar, and we grinded out a tough road win vs. a ranked opponent in a hostile environment. Sitting at 4-0, our fans ACTUALLY believe that this time it might be different.

2024: W 38-31 at Rutgers ... We steal a victory on a last-second miracle play and keep the dreams of a 9-win season and truly great bowl alive!
(Negative) If we lose this one, we prove that we are still the type of program that trips at the finish line when it looks like we might take that next step. Is two 8-win seasons in three years an amazing turn of events compared to past regimes? Of course ... but 10-2 or 9-3 was there for the taking, and we had everything to play for in Piscataway.
(Positive) Luck or not, our guys found a way to snatch a W, and we are one win against NU at a very Illini-friendly Wrigley Field away from winning 9 games for the third time this millennium.

2024: W 21-17 vs. #15 South Carolina ... We beat our first SEC opponent EVER and win a meaningful bowl game for the first time in decades.
(Negative) If we lose this one, we still walk away with a great season. However, the narrative is solidified that we are a rung below. We couldn't handle the athleticism and talent of a truly good SEC squad, and while we are all somewhat excited for 2025 ... people aren't exactly ready to be hurt again.
(Positive) What. A. Statement. We take on the allegedly hottest team in the nation, take their best punch and simply REFUSE to lose. The Illini are celebrating a Citrus Bowl championship, we are looking at a top 15 preseason ranking for the next year and most of us are still pinching ourselves to see if we are dreaming.

I feel that this Indiana game carries similar weight. Are we 3-1 with our only decent win over a paper tiger Duke team and unable to win the types of games we need to in order to dream about things like the CFP? Or are we 4-0, knocking on the door of the top 5 and silencing the doubters once again with a statement win?

I will say that I find it interesting that our Citrus Bowl win described above is not really living in people's psyche in this thread as much as it should. Could we lose to Indiana? DUH, lol. Are there concerning aspects to things like our slow starts? Yes. However, let's stop acting like we don't have a team full of guys who HAVE stepped up to these kinds of challenges and gotten wins before.
Great analysis, and I’ll add another angle that I was thinking about prior to reading this post.

I remember listening to SportsTalk after we beat Kansas last year. The conversation (I think it was Scott Beatty and Loren Tate, not for sure) on the show was, and I’m paraphrasing, “If we beat Central Michigan and start the season 3-0, we only have to win three more games to clinch a bowl bid! We’re halfway there!”

Our remaining schedule included Purdue, Minnesota, Michigan State, Rutgers and Northwestern; and we only had to win three of those five. Not an unreasonable accomplishment. Nobody knew what to expect from this team, but at the time six wins and a bowl invitation was considered a successful season after coming off a disappointing 5-7 in 2023.

Now here we are, almost exactly one later, discussing a week 4 game and B1G opener as a must win because we believe it could have CFP implications! How things have changed in just a year!
 
#454      
After reading all the comments from Indinia fans on this thread and other places, I’ve come to the conclusion that they have now surpassed Notre Dame fans in their arrogance. Despite my dislike of Cignetti, he is a good coach and they are a good team, but they are not the second coming of 1980’s Oklahoma. I don’t know if Illinois is better but I really hope we win this game just to shut them up.
0000000000000000000000.gif


I. concur. !
 
#455      
From an article on Texas A&M. Substitute Aggie for Illini.

Elko was recently asked about this phenomenon, dubbed “Battered Aggie Syndrome,” during a recent appearance at the Touchdown Club in Houston. He didn’t hold back with his response.

“I’m sorry, but I had nothing to do with a majority of it,” he said. “You love Texas A&M football, so get excited. Stop being scared and get excited about what this program is doing. It’s not fair to look at past failures and eliminate how you feel about where Texas A&M football is going.”
 
#456      
Then look at common opponents from last year

Michigan (21-7) vs (20-15)
Purdue (50-49) vs (66-0)
Northwestern (38-28) vs (41-24)
Nebraska (31-24) vs (56-7)
Michigan State (38-16) vs (47-10)

35-25 average vs 46-11

The more I look at the numbers, and Indiana at home in a night game, they have the better QB (some on here must not be familiar with Mendoza. He went 19/20 last game and he’s projected as a top 20 pick everywhere)- I’d be surprised if Illinois keeps it close. They also have a 1st rounder at CB too per Walter Football.

I’ll say

Indiana 31
Illinois 17
Animated GIF
 
#457      
Lot of Indiana trolls on the board today.

Pretty amazing since before last season they had never won 10 games. Last IU trip to Rose Bowl was 1968.

I will say Cignetti is a miracle worker. Lets see if he can do it 2 years in a row. If he does, I see Alabama or USC coming with a $10M/year offer to steal him from Bloomington.
 
#458      
I have never seen a box score like this. ODU averaged 7.0 yards per play to Indiana's 5.6, yet only ran 45 plays to Indiana's 89. Being -2 in the TO dept didn't help. Still super odd to only get half the plays of your opponent when you're averaging more yards per play.

*Edit: Looking at it deeper, almost half of ODU's yards came on 2 plays. Outside of those 2 plays, they averaged just 3.7 yards per play.

Screenshot 2025-09-17 at 3.28.16 PM.png
 
#459      
I disagree. Mendoza is the far more talented QB. He's very mobile and he has tremendous arm strength. CBS latest mock draft chose him as the #1 overall pick in the NFL draft. His ceiling is very high.

I would say Indiana has playoff quality talent as they have many guys projected to be picked in the 3 rounds of the NFL draft. Cignetti swept all the National COY awards so I would say he too is a championship level coach.
He might be more talented, but do you think he is going to improve on O'Rourke's passing stats, even with a better arm? He is a better runner.

Here is comparing Orourke 2024 vs. the first three games for Mendoza. Given Mendoza has played cream puffs I'd assume his passing results will be worse across the board.

O: 69% completion at 9.5 YPA, 9.1% TD, 1.6% Int
M: 72% completion at 9.3 YPA, 11.9% TD, 0% Int (against Old Dominion he completed 58%, 6.2 YPA, no TDs and no picks. At the best that is uninspiring. Is that going to be representative of his stats when he plays real teams?)
 
#462      
He might be more talented, but do you think he is going to improve on O'Rourke's passing stats, even with a better arm? He is a better runner.

Here is comparing Orourke 2024 vs. the first three games for Mendoza. Given Mendoza has played cream puffs I'd assume his passing results will be worse across the board.

O: 69% completion at 9.5 YPA, 9.1% TD, 1.6% Int
M: 72% completion at 9.3 YPA, 11.9% TD, 0% Int (against Old Dominion he completed 58%, 6.2 YPA, no TDs and no picks. At the best that is uninspiring. Is that going to be representative of his stats when he plays real teams?)

A 72% completion percentage with 0 turnovers is pretty good. Is 19/20 uninspiring? How much better do you want him to be than that? Most QBs aren’t completing 19/20 vs air.
 
#463      
A 72% completion percentage with 0 turnovers is pretty good. Is 19/20 uninspiring? How much better do you want him to be than that? Most QBs aren’t completing 19/20 vs air.
Indinia was playing against air.
 
#468      
A 72% completion percentage with 0 turnovers is pretty good. Is 19/20 uninspiring? How much better do you want him to be than that? Most QBs aren’t completing 19/20 vs air.
It’s a comparison based on the assertion Mendoza was going to be a big improvement from orourke. The point is Mendoza, playing cream puffs, has similar stats so far to ororke’s full season, which included the BIG games for orourke. Of the three games so far, Mendoza did not put up impressive stats in the one real game. He was very meh in that one. I’m not seeing how Mendoza is going to have better passing results than orourke now that they are going to start playing real teams.
 
#469      
Another stat not mentioned enough is the connection between Luke and Beatty. If I’m not mistaken they have connected with 19 receptions on 20 targets. Talk about a guy you can confidently go to in a crunch! That connection will only get better with time as well. I’m not even adding how versatile a weapon Beatty has been for us on returns and with some shifty rushing.

Illini 30
Indiana 24
 
Last edited:
#470      
Both coaching staffs have been pointing to this game at least since the summer. Apparently, both have been running “vanilla” offenses and defenses in their first 3 games, and are expected to unveil new plays, formations, etc. in this game. The winner of this game may well come down to which team can make effective adjustments on the fly. I like Illinois’ chances to adapt more quickly and effectively for several reasons: the continuity of the coaching staff, the larger number of returning starters on both sides of the ball, and the fact that they’ve been challenged in the first half of the last two games that have forced them to adjust. I doubt Indiana was forced to make any on the fly adjustments during their 73-0 win over Indiana State.

Another favorable comparison for Illinois is the game experience of the two starting quarterbacks. Mendoza has plenty of college game experience, but Saturday’s game has to be the most meaningful one he’s ever played in. His first two years were with bad teams that had little to play for, plus 3 games this year against cupcakes. If Illinois defensive backfield can effectively disguise coverages and/or Gabe and his buddies can apply consistent QB pressure it may put him in unfamiliar territory which can lead to mistakes. Plus, he is still learning how his new teammates will react under pressure. Altmeyer, on the other hand, has the advantage of playing in numerous high-pressure games with very familiar teammates and coaching staff. He also has the confidence of several great 4th quarter performances in tight games last year. I'm expecting a tight game throughout that may be decided on a late turnover.
 
#471      
Then look at common opponents from last year

Michigan (21-7) vs (20-15)
Purdue (50-49) vs (66-0)
Northwestern (38-28) vs (41-24)
Nebraska (31-24) vs (56-7)
Michigan State (38-16) vs (47-10)

35-25 average vs 46-11

The more I look at the numbers, and Indiana at home in a night game, they have the better QB (some on here must not be familiar with Mendoza. He went 19/20 last game and he’s projected as a top 20 pick everywhere)- I’d be surprised if Illinois keeps it close. They also have a 1st rounder at CB too per Walter Football.

I’ll say

Indiana 31
Illinois 17
Last years success applies more to our team and IU. They lost the majority of last year's starters. We didnt.
 
#472      
First, in my preseason predictions I said that I didn't believe Duke and Indiana would turn out to be that good. I think I was right about Duke. I've begun to think I might be wrong about Indiana.

Second, we don't really know just how good either of these teams is. Indiana's signature win last year was Michigan, which isn't much. Ours was Michigan and SC. This year neither team has much to hang their hat on.

Us having more continuity leads me to pick us. I've been disappointed that the continuity on the O-Line hasn't paid dividends. I don't think there's a more important spot for us to make an improvement in that the play there. We need a better running game and we need our QB to stay healthy. I sure hope this is the game they click.
 
#475      
A 72% completion percentage with 0 turnovers is pretty good. Is 19/20 uninspiring? How much better do you want him to be than that? Most QBs aren’t completing 19/20 vs air.
It’s a comparison based on the assertion Mendoza was going to be a big improvement from orourke. The point is Mendoza, playing cream puffs, has similar stats so far to ororke’s full season, which included the BIG games for orourke. Of the three games so far, Mendoza did not put up impressive stats in the one real game. He was very meh I’m not seeing how Mendoza is going to have better passing results than orourke now that they are going to start playing real teams.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back