good pointPurdue students don’t have any friends sending them anything on social media to require checking their phones for![]()
good pointPurdue students don’t have any friends sending them anything on social media to require checking their phones for![]()
For sure, it's the average difference of personal fouls, points, non-steal turnovers, and blocks at home vs away over 60 games, plus some kind of weight for elevation. I'm not sure what the coefficient is for each variable, but to use it in an example, West Virginia has the top HCA at 4.6. They have on average 5.6 less fouls at home, 12.7 more points, 1.6 less non-steal turnovers, and 1.6 more blocks. Plus their elevation is 1,000 (meters?) which is 60th in the nation.I think it's fascinating how many variables could go into that. For example, I would consider Minnesota (#16 on this list) to have a comparatively good crowd and atmosphere for how bad they usually are. Conversely, I would consider Penn State (#5 on this list) to have possibly the worst home court atmosphere in the league, on average.
This is harder to put a data point on, but I just subjectively never felt like our guys feel any more comfortable playing in Champaign than anywhere else. I guess a positive spin on that is maybe it could serve us well come Tournament time (we all remember several mid-2000s Wisconsin teams that were literally unbeatable at home and routinely flamed out early in March Madness) ... but I must admit that I miss the House of 'Paign having a reputation similar to Mackey does now. And, in case anyone forgot ... it did in the mid-2000s.
That which does not kill us makes us strongerBack to the topic at hand ... Purdue.
My concern is that Braden Smith is going to hound Keaton like he's never been hounded before, and we don't have a secondary ball handler in Bam to ease some of that pressure. Our freshman -- heck, all of our guys -- have never experienced a crowd as hostile as Mackey. Playing with house money so it will be fun to see if we can handle the heat.
It definitely lacks a certain leadership quality.Is this a soft resignation?
FWIW the 70s were pretty dead-assed in general in The Assembly Hall. I grew up sad I’d missed out on the glory days in Huff.People say this, but I really don’t think it’s a good explanation. The renovation filled in a ton of useless, ugly gray space between the sidelines and the first row of A Section, it maintained the basic shape of Assembly Hall and it kept Krush just as close to the court as the Izzone is at MSU and significantly closer to the court than the Paint Crew is at Purdue. We even solved the problem of not having our TV broadcasts pointed at the back of the Krush and showcasing a smattering of empty gray seats in A Section. Sure, we (barely) reduced capacity … but we still have about the same as Purdue and more than MSU.
I think there are two broader problems, and I’ll admit I neither know why they’re problems nor how to fix them, lol.
1) There’s no way around it, but the Krush literally hasn’t *tried* to be an actual student section in like 15 years. I mean, they cheer loudly when exciting stuff happens, but so does everyone else. Their jobs should be to CREATE our game day atmosphere, not merely be another piece that reacts to the action. When’s the last time the Krush started a “Go, Illini, Go!” chant to keep crowd noise at a respectable minimum? Is it “just kids these days” or something like that? Nope, Purdue and MSU student sections aren’t this way. Is it kids wanting to seem reserved and chill in front of guys/gals they like instead of cheering? Same stuff would have applied to all of the better eras of Krush.
2) Not sure if the 2008-2019 stretch permanently scarred an entire generation, but our non-student fans, especially in Champaign, are SO much more “wine and cheese” than they were in the past. I attended my first Illini home game in 2007, and I was star struck by Assembly Hall. We lost to a top 5 Wisconsin squad in a close game, but that place ROCKED. We sat up in B Section, but people of all ages all around us were standing regularly and loudly cheering all game.
The most bizarre piece of this puzzle for me is that Illini fans in places like Vegas, Braggin’ Rights, the United Center, Boston for the 2024 NCAA Tournament, etc. were SO loud and rowdy and nothing like what we see at our home games. No one is asking a 50-year season ticket holder who’s supported the program financially for decades and just wants to enjoy the game to be some fanatic, haha … but middle aged folks? Three dudes attending as a bros outing? A STUDENT SECTION?! Come on, has to be so much better.
The home of The Curtain of Distraction has bad home court crowd? How?Is this a soft resignation?
Or the Chef hat guy from 2005. I'm pretty sure he was at EVERY game, even the road onesBring back this guy:
View attachment 46716
I didn't make the Zona game, but you could tell on TV that is was very loud. Did you go to the OSU game in 2022? That's the loudest game I've experienced since the 05 Wisconsin game. It was deafening when Brad got ejected and hyped the crowd up. And after CoHawk had that fastbreak dunk? Good times, even though it was a fake rallyThis is a very valid point for that sideline, and I am sympathetic to the idea that you just can't replicate how cool it was to have the Krush literally standing on the court. I suppose we could have done a setup like Duke where the TV camera does not look at the benches, and we could have tried to keep the Krush on the floor opposite the benches like they used to be. However, whatever we lost on the non-TV sideline, I would argue this is a pretty huge improvement on the opposite side. At least IMO, the setup on TV is vastly superior ... it used to drive me nuts to have the national audience see the giant unused space before A Section and then a bunch of unused gray seats.
![]()
Also, does anyone know how many Krush students are around the court now? I would honestly be shocked if it was fewer than before the renovation.
I'm sympathetic to the idea of looking back at the Glory Days with rose-tinted glasses, and there were certainly probably random games in that era where the Hall seemed dead. However, there are a lot of games available on YouTube from many years. I would argue there is pretty clear evidence that our home court atmosphere, specifically the Krush, has objectively declined. The only game in this great 2020-2026 stretch where I thought to myself, "Wow, this place is rocking like the mid-2000s!" was the 2021-22 home loss to #11 Arizona. Kind of hilariously, I figured out that was a Krush "alumni" game.
The parts of your post I will agree with is that (A) Illini fans are certainly some of the best around in terms of our loyalty and passion for the program, and (B) SFC indeed can still get really loud and be very intimidating. However, I definitely think our consistency has slipped mightily.
The fundraising angle is kind of cool just from the altruism aspect, but at some point, it became more about that and less about being a superfan. Even when I joined in 2005, there was no longer an Illini "quiz" component.When I was in Orange Crush (as it was called) we had the same seat for every game. There was no fundraising component, and you had to demonstrate your enthusiasm to even get in.
I agree it needs an overhaul.
Oh dear god! The 18-22 year old students in Krush don’t know anything about the Chief. Your request is that of a dinosaur refusing to accept its fate as fossil fuel.It would never happen given the political climate at UI with the Trustees, faculty, interest groups, etc., but bringing back a certain Native American that symbolized the strength, courage, and fight of our football and basketball teams for decades would do more to inject a truly raucous atmosphere at SFC than any combination of other ideas could ever hope to engender. If you're picking up on what I'm laying down. Old alumni would be on their feet cheering wildly, and young students would embrace the change wholeheartedly for the most part as our heritage is imparted to them.
It would never happen given the political climate at UI with the Trustees, faculty, interest groups, etc., but bringing back a certain Native American that symbolized the strength, courage, and fight of our football and basketball teams for decades would do more to inject a truly raucous atmosphere at SFC than any combination of other ideas could ever hope to engender. If you're picking up on what I'm laying down. Old alumni would be on their feet cheering wildly, and young students would embrace the change wholeheartedly for the most part as our heritage is imparted to them.
Kylan Boswell wore Chief shoes and he's 20 years old. I think the 18-22 year olds that make up the Orange Krush know about the Chief. Many people chant Chief during halftime after the music plays.Oh dear god! The 18-22 year old students in Krush don’t know anything about the Chief. Your request is that of a dinosaur refusing to accept its fate as fossil fuel.
It would never happen given the political climate at UI with the Trustees, faculty, interest groups, etc., but bringing back a certain Native American that symbolized the strength, courage, and fight of our football and basketball teams for decades would do more to inject a truly raucous atmosphere at SFC than any combination of other ideas could ever hope to engender. If you're picking up on what I'm laying down. Old alumni would be on their feet cheering wildly, and young students would embrace the change wholeheartedly for the most part as our heritage is imparted to them.
Oh dear god! The 18-22 year old students in Krush don’t know anything about the Chief. Your request is that of a dinosaur refusing to accept its fate as fossil fuel.
I just pull out my phone and pull up YouTube at halftime when I'm at a game...It would never happen given the political climate at UI with the Trustees, faculty, interest groups, etc., but bringing back a certain Native American that symbolized the strength, courage, and fight of our football and basketball teams for decades would do more to inject a truly raucous atmosphere at SFC than any combination of other ideas could ever hope to engender. If you're picking up on what I'm laying down. Old alumni would be on their feet cheering wildly, and young students would embrace the change wholeheartedly for the most part as our heritage is imparted to them.
The only polls I could find supported the Chief overwhelmingly by the student body. I've yet to meet a fan of Illini athletics that's anti-Chief. Gameday Spirit (which Brian Barnhart proudly reads out as the official fanstore of the Fighting Illini) sells a ton of Chief gear. If the Illini were to reinstate the Chief (which I don't think they're interested in doing), now would be a great time. This is the weakest the NCAA has ever been and I suspect the current administration would be very supportive.Don't really want to open the can of worms more but polling consistently shows that students don't support the return of the Chief. Its a moot point anyway because the NCAA was the one that forced the change not the university.
As a member of the fan base who could be considered on the younger side, the chief was a extremely memorable and foundational part of my fan hood growing up. One of the only things that gets me teary eyed besides seeing my wife walk down the aisle is watching the last dance.The only polls I could find supported the Chief overwhelmingly by the student body. I've yet to meet a fan of Illini athletics that's anti-Chief. Gameday Spirit (which Brian Barnhart proudly reads out as the official fanstore of the Fighting Illini) sells a ton of Chief gear. If the Illini were to reinstate the Chief (which I don't think they're interested in doing), now would be a great time. This is the weakest the NCAA has ever been and I suspect the current administration would be very supportive.