Purdue looks bad to me. I think Bama will steamroll them.Bama beat Arkansas State by 9 and McNeese State by 8. We’ll know more about them after they play Purdue on Friday.
Best case scenario... Bama beats Purdue by 40+ and then we beat Bama by 40+I know I literally just posted in another thread about the importance of Big Ten teams performing well in the non-conference ... but I definitely hope 'Bama wins in West Lafayette. For one, I am a bit sick of Purdue and I miss the days during my formative years when they were terrible and only deserved a casual, passing respect for Gene Keady.The more important thing, though, is that I really do not want to be Alabama's "rebound game," heading back to their home turf after a draining loss in the hornet's nest that is Mackey Arena. So, go 'Bama!
As for this game and ignoring how Alabama performs in West Lafayette, we will need to clean things up a lot to win. However, Alabama has looked far from invincible and we have the talent to win. Let's hope it all comes together next week!
And 'Bama somehow gains that 40+ point advantage in the third overtime.Best case scenario... Bama beats Purdue by 40+ and then we beat Bama by 40+![]()
I know I literally just posted in another thread about the importance of Big Ten teams performing well in the non-conference For one, I am a bit sick of Purdue
Did you not see Bringin Down the House Ben Humrichous last night??I'm not sure if anyone else has this concern, but I don't see anyone on our roster that's overly athletic or explosive. Maybe Morez?
The SEC teams coming up are going to be wildly athletic. Last year, guys like CH, Ty and TJ were all unique and explosive athletes. This year, it's early but I haven't seen anyone jump off the page.
Thanks, I accidentally had signatures disabled and forgot I even had that!View attachment 37303
From your own signature...nuff said
I'm not sure if anyone else has this concern, but I don't see anyone on our roster that's overly athletic or explosive. Maybe Morez?
The SEC teams coming up are going to be wildly athletic. Last year, guys like CH, Ty and TJ were all unique and explosive athletes. This year, it's early but I haven't seen anyone jump off the page.
Good stuff. I agree with 98.9% of that. Those are all very good points .I agree to an extent, although CH isn't really a great athlete. I think his max vertical at the combine was 32" which is below average.
There will be nobody on this team like TSJ, athletically, and that we can say for certain.
DGL looks to have what I would call tier-1 athleticism at the D1 level, but he's a role player at the moment.
Also, Sports Illustrated currently has Tre as a 2nd round pick in this year's draft, and says his athleticism "really pops".
Not to tangent on Tre, but there's a lot of chatter about how he hasn't played well. What hasn't he done well? He's shooting 47/44/83 and averaging 8 points and 4 rebounds in 18 minutes per game.
Anyway, back on topic: I think the euro guys are probably also more athletic than we give them credit for, KJ especially.
Our backup center is 3x the athlete as the one we used last season, and while Domask was fantastic he is not more athletically gifted than KJ.
Wouldn't categorize Harmon, Guerrier as athletic either (Guerrier actually had some nagging injuries as well, I recall) and Goode would be Jake Davis except one was a rotation player and the other currently is not.
I think on the top end we are missing some athleticism we had last season, but would say we are more balanced in that regard now, we just don't have that uber-athletic freak like TSJ this year.
Good stuff. I agree with 98.9% of that. Those are all very good points .
The only thing I would push back on a little is Guerrier. (Quincy clearly had hops.)
I couldn’t find his vertical score from the combine. But Quincy definitely had an above the rim game. At 6foot 7in or 6ft 8in…he led the team in dunks and it wasn’t even close.
I agree with LoveLovie on both of these requirements, but...Can’t turn it over like they did. Have to shoot better from 3