Pregame: Illinois vs Long Island, Saturday, November 22nd, 1:00pm CT, B1G+

Status
Not open for further replies.
#26      
Lost by 4 and shot ourselves in the foot numerous times but yes the sky is falling.
I wouldn't say the sky is falling, but yes we lost by four and shot ourselves in the foot numerous times because we missed at least four free throws. The math is pretty straightforward here.
 
#27      
Super intrigued to see how Petro gets worked in. 5 assists in 12 minutes tonight, and he looked like he could get into the lane at will.

Can be a nice change up if we get stagnant to spam the pick n roll with him. Given the spot and moment, I'm not sure I could be any more pleased than he gave tonight.
Plus it allows Kylan to play off ball more
 
#30      
Perspective after that loss. We reintegrated two guys, one of which is brand new, back into the rotation. Tomi clearly not his old self. Petrovic will get there. Both will be top 7 minute guys on this team.

Need to get some more consistency and PT out of lineups. Getting and staying healthy over the next week+ is massive.
 
#31      
If the "problem" of free throws isn't solved by making more free throws, then how else would you solve it?
Consistency. Sustaining a good free throw rate over consecutive games, I'll keep the bar low and ask for two games in a row with at least 70%, which we've yet to do.
 
#35      
Their season average is 75%. This is silly.
And against real opponents specifically they're averaging 65%. If you average 65% against your real competition and 80-something% against your cupcakes, yeah your season average looks good, but when the postseason comes and you're out of cupcakes, what do you think will happen?
 
#36      
And against real opponents specifically they're averaging 65%. If you average 65% against your real competition and 80-something% against your cupcakes, yeah your season average looks good, but when the postseason comes and you're out of cupcakes, what do you think will happen?
FT% will normalize. I'm just now realizing you're in a tizzy about this because they shot 69.6% against Texas Tech, which to you means that this definitive 5 game sample shows they can't make FTs against good teams.
 
#38      
You want him to take KB, Andrej or Keaton's minutes?

Is this in regards to Petro?

The guy I look at is actually mirk. The nights he doesn’t have it, I think Andrej sliding to the 4 with a Boswell and Petro backcourt and Keaton at 3 is where I’d expect more minutes for him.

That said, I still need to see a lot more from him before I’d advocate 20+ Petro minutes right now - just spitballing where I’d see some time open up.
 
#40      
Their season average is 75%. This is silly.
To be fair, one of those games was a 20-21 night, which is not sustainable.

In three of the five games, free thrown shooting has been mediocre at best.

I’ll stand by what I said in a different post. Make free throws consistently and get healthy, and this team’s ceiling is legitimately national championship caliber. But the free throw shooting has to be a lot more consistent.
 
#41      
FT% will normalize. I'm just now realizing you're in a tizzy about this because they shot 69.6% against Texas Tech, which to you means that this definitive 5 game sample shows they can't make FTs against good teams.
I'm not saying they can't, I'm saying I haven't seen it yet and it's something I'd like them to fix (and I do think they can fix).

It's literally the headline here- Free throws doom Illinois in United Center loss to Alabama | The Champaign Room https://share.google/FjGxtdIVGYfJXj0BW
 
#42      
To be fair, one of those games was a 20-21 night, which is not sustainable.

In three of the five games, free thrown shooting has been mediocre at best.

I’ll stand by what I said in a different post. Make free throws consistently and get healthy, and this team’s ceiling is legitimately national championship caliber. But the free throw shooting has to be a lot more consistent.

95% obviously isn’t sustainable, true

Is 59% “sustainable”?

You’re trying to include one outlier and exclude another. That doesn’t really give an accurate picture

I think the answer lies somewhere in between

Shooting (including free throws) is volatile, some nights it’ll look good and others it wont

76% overall is pretty good, and I think it will go back up to where it was before we just shot a season low %
 
Last edited:
#43      
95% obviously isn’t sustainable, true

Is 59% “sustainable”?

You’re trying to include one outlier and exclude another. That doesn’t really give an accurate picture

I think the answer lies somewhere in between

Shooting (including free throws) is volatile, some nights it’ll look good and others it wont

76% overall is pretty good, and I think it will go back up to where it was before we just shot a season low %
Yeah, the doom posting falls into the same patterns of discounting every good trend to "prove" the bad trends are the norm.

That's the thing about basketball, some nights you're on, some you aren't. Larger the sample size, the more you can read from it.

One game of 13-22 shooting is just as predictive as one game of 20-21 shooting.
 
#44      
The missed FT's were definitely a problem...but am I the only one that saw a lack of rebounding (especially in the 2nd half) on the defensive end as a problem as well??? I remember in the 2nd half Bama I think got 4 shots on one possession ( I think 3 of the 4 shots were from 3)...another possession Bama got 3 attempts before a put back....these seemed to come at a crucial point just as we were gaining momentum and stemmed any chance of us regaining the lead....I know on paper the rebounding was pretty even...but to me some of Bama's offensive rebounds were back breakers....whoops...posted in the wrong thread...but my thoughts still stand
 
#45      
Just to play devil's advocate about MP, in 12 minutes he was -16 which was by far the worst +/- on the team. I know there is a lot more to +/- especially in limited minutes but like I said, just playing DA.
 
#46      
And against real opponents specifically they're averaging 65%. If you average 65% against your real competition and 80-something% against your cupcakes, yeah your season average looks good, but when the postseason comes and you're out of cupcakes, what do you think will happen?
Do you think cupcakes have bad FT defense of which we can take advantage, but we are incapable of doing so against "real competition?" The season is just 4 games old for crying out loud. Yeah, I would expect over the course of a season that our FT% would be a little lower against high level competition because the players are going to be exerting themselves at a higher rate and be more tired/winded when they are taking the shot. But it isn't going to be pushing a 20% difference. Way too early to be worrying about FT shooting.
 
#47      
The missed FT's were definitely a problem...but am I the only one that saw a lack of rebounding (especially in the 2nd half) on the defensive end as a problem as well??? I remember in the 2nd half Bama I think got 4 shots on one possession ( I think 3 of the 4 shots were from 3)...another possession Bama got 3 attempts before a put back....these seemed to come at a crucial point just as we were gaining momentum and stemmed any chance of us regaining the lead....I know on paper the rebounding was pretty even...but to me some of Bama's offensive rebounds were back breakers....whoops...posted in the wrong thread...but my thoughts still stand
My hoped-for explanation is our gameplan uses Ivisic (both of them) to help make rebounds possible even if it's not one of them coming away with the ball, but both were playing hobbled.

My explanation that I hope isn't true is when Andrej takes over a game the rest of the team play like outfielders when a pitcher keeps throwing strikeouts, they're not engaged on one end and that carries over to the other end. I don't think this impacted Kylan or Ben as much but Keaton was somewhat impacted and Mirk was just gone.
 
#48      
Do you think cupcakes have bad FT defense of which we can take advantage, but we are incapable of doing so against "real competition?" The season is just 4 games old for crying out loud. Yeah, I would expect over the course of a season that our FT% would be a little lower against high level competition because the players are going to be exerting themselves at a higher rate and be more tired/winded when they are taking the shot. But it isn't going to be pushing a 20% difference. Way too early to be worrying about FT shooting.
Of course not FT defense, but there's a reason people talk about how does a team react when the lights get bright, and for this team so far the lights get bright they start missing free throws. I don't think it's ever too early to consider room for improvement, especially from these high-competition games.
 
#49      
Just to play devil's advocate about MP, in 12 minutes he was -16 which was by far the worst +/- on the team. I know there is a lot more to +/- especially in limited minutes but like I said, just playing DA.
Noticed that too. I thought he popped hard on offense and conversely looked baaaad defensively but not to the tune of -16. +\- is fun but can be misleading I don’t think that’s all on him.

But I think his defense is as advertised. Which is to say it really is lacking. That’ll limit his minutes.

That being said, I’m withholding full judgement until he’s had more than 3 practices and a single game under his belt.
 
#50      
95% obviously isn’t sustainable, true

Is 59% “sustainable”?

You’re trying to include one outlier and exclude another. That doesn’t really give an accurate picture

I think the answer lies somewhere in between

Shooting (including free throws) is volatile, some nights it’ll look good and others it wont

76% overall is pretty good, and I think it will go back up to where it was before we just shot a season low %
As a counterpoint - 59% is more sustainable than 95%. Doesn’t mean you should exclude either... but 59% will likely be closer to our season average than 95%. But most importantly, the 59% was in a true game setting. In the two game sample of non-cupcake competition - which is the only sample that should matter as we get into UConn/Tennessee/B10 play - we have not shot it well.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back