Pregame: Illinois vs Nebraska, Tuesday, January 31st, 6:00pm CT, BTN

Status
Not open for further replies.
#51      
Take a look at the rest of NW schedule. Tough sledding and compressed schedule after their COVID reschedules. 6-3 to 9-11 is very possible.
Illinois schedule after Nebraska also gets REAL!!! Could be great February but could be a very tough FEB!!
 
#52      
Will Luke play? We need more depth with Skyy gone.

Starters
--Jaden G
-- TSJ S SF
-- MM SF
--Coleman PF
--Dain C

Our bench is now
-- Sencire G
-- Ty PF
-- RJ SF

In an emergency
-- Brandon C
-- Nico G
-- Zacharie C
 
#53      

WWWWRocU

Herndon, VA
Just when I thought we would be seeing Lieb on a regular basis, he disappears. Would have been nice to see him get a few minutes at whiskey, but then it looked like BU had a tight substitute rotation going and nobody got in serious foul trouble and Dain became the answer.
 
#55      

CleaverName

Chicago but not there anymore
There's part of me that wants to disagree with this - there's always some "true mean" of any distribution you sample from. But I think in practice, trying to figure out how good a college 3-point shooter is in a given season, you're probably right. The sample size is too small and correlated to have much confidence on whether a player like "Sophomore RJ Melendez" is really a 25% in-game 3pt shooter performing at average, or a 40% shooter under-performing.

With teams and winning percentage I tend to disagree a bit more. A lot of those factors average out, and the sample size is decent, so stats-based systems are pretty good at differentiating between, say, a top-5 team and a fringe top-25 team. That suggests there is a useful "true mean" that can be separated from "random" effects from game to game.

In the end, it really boils down to an arbitrary choice: what's "random" and what's not? Old-school sports narratives are built on denying randomness: everything can be explained by something, whether it's "clutchness", "tired legs", or "being in a funk". These days a lot of discussions swing towards the other extreme, where everything is ascribed to randomness. In reality the answer is both 1) in between and 2) dependent on what question you really want to ask.
I like the way you phrased the question about RJ, is he a 25% in-game 3pt shooter performing at average, or a 40% shooter under-performing. I hope the second and that he snaps out of it tomorrow

But I'll push back on the team portion, this year's team isn't the same as last year's team, and even within this season the team is performing radically different from month to month. Yes you can take the average of those performance but citing the Bracketology thread, using past team's performance as a predictor isn't going to work that well. Different teams have different expectations and tend to perform similarly from year to year but not because they need to revert to average but because the best players go to the best programs and the worst to the worst so the teams end up being relatively similar year to year

Illinois' basketball and football programs are both trending upwards and I sincerely hope that we don't return to the averages of the past decade !
 
#58      
Will Luke play? We need more depth with Skyy gone.

Starters
--Jaden G
-- TSJ S SF
-- MM SF
--Coleman PF
--Dain C

Our bench is now
-- Sencire G
-- Ty PF
-- RJ SF

In an emergency
-- Brandon C
-- Nico G
-- Zacharie C
And Lieb
 
#59      

altgeld88

Arlington, Virginia
Ok. Serious question here. Me = engineer, used probability distribution functions as part of work for some number of years. Wife = advanced degree in mathematics, PhD in physics, uses a lot of statistics. Neither of us has heard of "true mean". What is this? Who made this up? Why?
Ex-engineer/longtime investment finance guy here. I haven't taken or applied stats at work in probably 25 years but dimly recall that true mean is the population mean, which can't be apprehended b/c the population can't be apprehended. We're always dealing with a sampled subset of the population.

Happy to be corrected by someone who has more than a dozen synapses to rub together after a 14-hour day.
 
#60      
Will Luke play? We need more depth with Skyy gone.

Starters
--Jaden G
-- TSJ S SF
-- MM SF
--Coleman PF
--Dain C

Our bench is now
-- Sencire G
-- Ty PF
-- RJ SF

In an emergency
-- Brandon C
-- Nico G
-- Zacharie C
Many on here seem to think LG will make little or no difference coming back this year. He can’t get into playing shape, He averaged 2 points a game last year, etc…. Sounds like he’s a broken down 60 year old like most of us.

Horse hockey!! Let’s welcome back Luke with a youthful exuberance full of optimism!!
 
#61      
Many on here seem to think LG will make little or no difference coming back this year. He can’t get into playing shape, He averaged 2 points a game last year, etc…. Sounds like he’s a broken down 60 year old like most of us.

Horse hockey!! Let’s welcome back Luke with a youthful exuberance full of optimism!!
“Horse hockey”?!?!? Let the memes begin!
 
#62      
Ok. Serious question here. Me = engineer, used probability distribution functions as part of work for some number of years. Wife = advanced degree in mathematics, PhD in physics, uses a lot of statistics. Neither of us has heard of "true mean". What is this? Who made this up? Why?
I first heard it in refernce to the stock market in december 2021. I wish i would have listened and sold everything while the market reverted to it’s historical mean.
 
#63      

danielb927

Orange Krush Class of 2013
Rochester, MN
Ok. Serious question here. Me = engineer, used probability distribution functions as part of work for some number of years. Wife = advanced degree in mathematics, PhD in physics, uses a lot of statistics. Neither of us has heard of "true mean". What is this? Who made this up? Why?

I don't know that it's a real term as such - I meant to refer to the mean of the underlying distribution (as opposed to the sample mean). I'm sure there's more precise language.
 
#64      

InDaAZ

Eugene, Oregon
“Horse hockey”?!?!? Let the memes begin!
Must resist… can’t resist…
tv show bs GIF

D096E902-73D5-4B4B-A7EE-75278A8438AE.jpeg

ren and stimpy nicksplat GIF
 
#65      
I like the way you phrased the question about RJ, is he a 25% in-game 3pt shooter performing at average, or a 40% shooter under-performing. I hope the second and that he snaps out of it tomorrow

But I'll push back on the team portion, this year's team isn't the same as last year's team, and even within this season the team is performing radically different from month to month. Yes you can take the average of those performance but citing the Bracketology thread, using past team's performance as a predictor isn't going to work that well. Different teams have different expectations and tend to perform similarly from year to year but not because they need to revert to average but because the best players go to the best programs and the worst to the worst so the teams end up being relatively similar year to year

Illinois' basketball and football programs are both trending upwards and I sincerely hope that we don't return to the averages of the past decade !
RJ''s 3 pt issues seem mechanical and most likely stem from his injured shoulder. May have forced him to change mechanics and just not back yet. He is a better shooter than he has shown. His base (feet) seem really close together which can make the jump shot a little more unstable.
 
#66      
Just when I thought we would be seeing Lieb on a regular basis, he disappears. Would have been nice to see him get a few minutes at whiskey, but then it looked like BU had a tight substitute rotation going and nobody got in serious foul trouble and Dain became the answer.
I’ve always seen the stat that Final Four teams actually have minutes pretty “tight” with the starters and then about 3-4 bench guys who play … so putting the “deep is good” thing to the test. Maybe we’re trying to really settle into a routine?
 
#67      
RJ''s 3 pt issues seem mechanical and most likely stem from his injured shoulder. May have forced him to change mechanics and just not back yet. He is a better shooter than he has shown. His base (feet) seem really close together which can make the jump shot a little more unstable.
If it's a mechanical issue, then I would expect it to affect him in practice, too. I haven't seen him in practice, but I thought the word was that he doesn't miss in practice.
 
#68      

DeonThomas

South Carolina
Maybe it's the engineer in me but I have seen this phrase, regress to the mean, from a few different posters and I think that the way it is being used it is a fallacy. When you roll a die or flip a coin over a long enough period of time the actual outcomes should approach the calculated outcomes. But in basketball there is not a specific natural average for a team's winning percentage or three point percentage. Hopefully RJ starts making threes and then his average will rise as a result of this better performance. But it is also possible that he keeps missing shots and his three point percentage stays low or goes even lower. There isn't a magic number for him to revert to... Hopefully he starts making 40-50% of his shots and then you'll hope he does NOT start going back to his season average

The same goes with Northwestern's record. It's tempting to say that usually Northwestern basketball is not very good so they will probably start losing more but I think it's more accurate to say that this year's Northwestern team is playing decently but based on the remaining games to be played they will probably lose more than they will win and their record is going to go down

I hope that makes sense and I think it is more than just semantics. Hopefully our players gel and we win every game for the rest of the year and don't play to our current average, there is no preset number of games that we are destined to win based on our current average (and hopefully Michigan loses the rest of their games because their current average doesn't mean they are going to win 50% of the rest)
WHAT?

Clearly the engineer in you. Yes. "Regress to the mean" is perhaps one of the clearest phrases used on Illinois Loyalty. Kudos to our fellow poster for using it in this context. It's also called basketball speak. We all know that Northwestern sucks. They've appeared in the NCAA tournament exactly one time in their entire college basketball history. Oh, and they joined in 1896 as a charter member. They are the perennial doormat of the Big 10 conference. They belong nowhere near the top of the conference standings. Our IL friend & colleague is simply saying he's waiting for NW to return to their normal and expected state of suckiness....................i.e. the mean...................i.e. at/near last place.............................as they've done throughout their basketball history. Mean = average. NW has averaged last place in the Big 10 since its inception in 1896.

No fallacy. Just fact. And a natural average for a rather pitiful basketball program.

BTW --- Speculating that Illinois, Indiana and Purdue have probably averaged finishing in the 1-2-3 spots in the standings.
 
#70      
Maybe it's the engineer in me but I have seen this phrase, regress to the mean, from a few different posters and I think that the way it is being used it is a fallacy. When you roll a die or flip a coin over a long enough period of time the actual outcomes should approach the calculated outcomes. But in basketball there is not a specific natural average for a team's winning percentage or three point percentage. Hopefully RJ starts making threes and then his average will rise as a result of this better performance. But it is also possible that he keeps missing shots and his three point percentage stays low or goes even lower. There isn't a magic number for him to revert to... Hopefully he starts making 40-50% of his shots and then you'll hope he does NOT start going back to his season average

The same goes with Northwestern's record. It's tempting to say that usually Northwestern basketball is not very good so they will probably start losing more but I think it's more accurate to say that this year's Northwestern team is playing decently but based on the remaining games to be played they will probably lose more than they will win and their record is going to go down

I hope that makes sense and I think it is more than just semantics. Hopefully our players gel and we win every game for the rest of the year and don't play to our current average, there is no preset number of games that we are destined to win based on our current average (and hopefully Michigan loses the rest of their games because their current average doesn't mean they are going to win 50% of the rest)
Also in the case of RJ, this mythical “mean” he is supposed to regress to with his 3-point shooting is based on 15 attempts last year. I think his 3-point shooting will improve — has too good of form for it not to right? — but don’t think we’ll see him equaling the 60% he shot last year. I thought after the Indiana game that there was light at the end of the tunnel, but he’s been back to bad last two games. Hopefully soon.
 
#71      
WHAT?

Clearly the engineer in you. Yes. "Regress to the mean" is perhaps one of the clearest phrases used on Illinois Loyalty. Kudos to our fellow poster for using it in this context. It's also called basketball speak. We all know that Northwestern sucks. They've appeared in the NCAA tournament exactly one time in their entire college basketball history. Oh, and they joined in 1896 as a charter member. They are the perennial doormat of the Big 10 conference. They belong nowhere near the top of the conference standings. Our IL friend & colleague is simply saying he's waiting for NW to return to their normal and expected state of suckiness....................i.e. the mean...................i.e. at/near last place.............................as they've done throughout their basketball history. Mean = average. NW has averaged last place in the Big 10 since its inception in 1896.

No fallacy. Just fact. And a natural average for a rather pitiful basketball program.

BTW --- Speculating that Illinois, Indiana and Purdue have probably averaged finishing in the 1-2-3 spots in the standings.
12E63081-8745-4493-B94E-FDD7E2C53D8C.jpeg
= Northwestern Sucks
 
#73      
I’ve always seen the stat that Final Four teams actually have minutes pretty “tight” with the starters and then about 3-4 bench guys who play … so putting the “deep is good” thing to the test. Maybe we’re trying to really settle into a routine?
Part of that being typically the starters on a final four team are all conference / NBA prospects so they are significantly better than a bench player. Illinois path may be slightly different as not sure there’s the same drop off between our 3rd and 7th best player. TSJ is probably our only first or second team all conference guy as of right now. Not saying Mayer hasn’t played like it the past month…
 
#75      

Captain 14

The Last Best Place
WHAT?

Clearly the engineer in you. Yes. "Regress to the mean" is perhaps one of the clearest phrases used on Illinois Loyalty. Kudos to our fellow poster for using it in this context. It's also called basketball speak. We all know that Northwestern sucks. They've appeared in the NCAA tournament exactly one time in their entire college basketball history. Oh, and they joined in 1896 as a charter member. They are the perennial doormat of the Big 10 conference. They belong nowhere near the top of the conference standings. Our IL friend & colleague is simply saying he's waiting for NW to return to their normal and expected state of suckiness....................i.e. the mean...................i.e. at/near last place.............................as they've done throughout their basketball history. Mean = average. NW has averaged last place in the Big 10 since its inception in 1896.

No fallacy. Just fact. And a natural average for a rather pitiful basketball program.

BTW --- Speculating that Illinois, Indiana and Purdue have probably averaged finishing in the 1-2-3 spots in the standings.
Don't be mean now...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.