Do we have a shooting coach? or Sport psychologist on the team?
This is a 1-3-1 zone team if not 3-2 hybrid. This team would be very hard to just shot overI think Brad wants to employ a lot of switching on ball screen defense, but we are too slow footed for that. We get lost on switches way too much. Once that happens, good teams keep moving the ball until they get a wide open shot.
This roster could benefit from using a little more zone, especially based on certain lineup combinations.
And some of the people on here actually liked this post. They must be a real joyful group.Another loss
And some of the people on here actually liked this post. They must be a real joyful group.
I’ll stick to my premise in an earlier post. For me it’s simply: shoot 30% 3pt and 70% free throws.If you out rebound them … Force them into less than 30% from 3 and shoot 40% or above from 3 yourself … They’re beatable …
I have ZERO confidence we can do 1 of those 3 … Let alone all 3 …
Lou Henson said it best when he said ( paraphrasing) you're not always going to shoot well but if you play good defense and rebound well you'll always give yourself a chance to win.Other than Boswell I’m not sure we have the dudes to win these big games. AS showed it against TT. Underwood is right, when the shots aren’t falling dudes are able to win in other ways (defense, free throws, playing through contact, etc). Our guys just keep shooting.
Paid $ article, but some info…Has there been more clarity with Andrej's injury?
Right, but we can't hit those modest averages, if Coach Underwood continues to be so relaxed (delusional?) about players performing roles they aren't performing well and seemingly can't perform well.It's honestly not as complicated as people think and say. Shots at rim, free throws, three point shooting is where games are determined with this squad. If we can just be AVERAGE:
If 3s can be at 30%
If FT can be at 70%
And Layups can be at 70%
We have a legit chance in every game we play.
The frustrating part is that the threes are wide open. You just don't want to deal with having to say "when we can't shoot, we need to...." every single game.
Exactly. No one is saying it’s Underwood’s fault directly that our players miss shots they should make or perform tasks they should be able to perform. It IS Brad’s fault, however, if he can’t make obvious corrections to our strategy when anyone with a brain sees we just don’t have the personnel to do things like jack up threes.Right, but we can't hit those modest averages, if Coach Underwood continues to be so relaxed (delusional?) about players performing roles they aren't performing well and seemingly can't perform well.
For example, why does Underwood think David Mirkovic's flat-footed 3s (which Mirk shot at 28% last season in the Adriatic League and at 27% this season at Illinois) are a good idea? They aren't. It makes no sense for Underwood to let players who can't shoot 3s well (like Mirkovic) continue to shoot them (not just when a clock expires), while Underwood didn't allow the same thing this year or in prior years for players like Jakstys, Johnson, Dainja, Hansberry, and Verdonk. (They all shot zero 3s in their season-long individual stats, at least for the seasons that I checked).
Similarly, why does Underwood claim that there are times when Mirkovic will play the point (like how Mirkovic was seemingly encouraged to handle the ball in the center of a fastbreak on Friday against UConn, where Mirkovic turned the ball over by travelling)? How can we win this game against Tennessee, when Coach Underwood appears to make coaching errors, concerning what is the best way to use a guy who is 6'9" and 250 pounds. So, instead of using Mirkovic to post or rebound, Underwood has him 25 feet from the basket and launching 3s or clumsily centering fastbreaks, when he should have been on a wing (at best) or trailing that fastbreak (due his slow waddle up the court).
I'm afraid we just don't have the personnel to be good without a relatively heavy diet of threes. We have a couple guys who can get to the basket but that won't be there as much if we aren't shooting threes and spacing the floor. And our D is never going to be good enough to win ugly.I cannot stress enough what bad news it will be for this team's ceiling if we "need to shoot better" to win. Guess what? Our guys frickin' suck at shooting, lol. If doing something WE DON'T DO is necessary for us to win games, we are screwed. We might have our random games like last year at Oregon where we look phenomenal, but who honestly cares if it's a total coin flip each round of the NCAA Tournament if we are moving on and looking great or going home after a total dud performance?
My point is, this game is sort of a line in the sand for me. I of course want to see us shoot well and win easily, but if we (like usual) aren't shooting well ... what's the plan?? Better be something other than hoping something will change, lol. Can we just out-tough an opponent, PLEASE?? After the UConn game, the type of energy we see from these guys on Saturday will say everything I need to know about what we can accomplish this year.