MustangWally
- Mayfield
Josh waiting for his luggage just like normal people.
Hawkins was a 3-star.Our team is essentially all top 100 4 stars with maybe one borderline 5 star (Skyy)
UCLA is better than that? (asking, don't know anything about UCLA's team)
We need more experience overall, of course, but on paper that seems pretty good to me.
Well, you didn't really address my point.Some people only look at points. Glad our coach doesn’t. RJ also has been playing terrific defense.
Top 100 is good and BU has certainly upgraded our talent, but there are teams out there with several McDonald's AAs. We don't have one. Our top rated player was just barely in the top 30. And Hawkins was rated around 150 and a three star.Our team is essentially all top 100 4 stars with maybe one borderline 5 star (Skyy)
UCLA is better than that? (asking, don't know anything about UCLA's team)
We need more experience overall, of course, but on paper that seems pretty good to me.
With that being said, will be a back and forth game. Wouldn't be surprised if this is the game Ty Rodgers makes a name for himself.
Illinois 78
UCLA 76
Big ten tourney champs and big ten regular season champs the last two years and you criticize the coach. What a fan you are.IMO it’s going to boil down to how BU manages these games/matchups. Can he put his players in a position to succeed. We have all the talent on paper. BU needs to maximize. Doesn’t seem to do that in big games of recent memory. ILL!
Our team is essentially all top 100 4 stars with maybe one borderline 5 star (Skyy)
UCLA is better than that? (asking, don't know anything about UCLA's team)
We need more experience overall, of course, but on paper that seems pretty good to me.
Nah, that's def an alien practicing mind control on you right now.View attachment 21438
Josh waiting for his luggage just like normal people.
Yep…
24/7 player rankings
Not inclusive of transfers
2018 - 2022 (5 years)
UCLA
4 - 5*
9 - 4*
2 - 3*
Illinois
0 - 5*
12 - 4*
8 - 3*
You just made me feel very old.Wish I could have remembered that team; my first real memory of a full season is 2001-02, with fuzzy memories of the 2001 NCAA Tournament. The 1998 team seems like a team I would have loved!
And Texas.Thanks for finding that. By most objective measures, they have more talent than us.
And further, there are teams like UNC, Duke, Kentucky, and Arkansas, that have even more talent than UCLA.
I meant just this yearYep…..pretty good.
Here’s the info you’re asking for.
If you can't remember Nick Weatherspoon, you are not old. Well, either that or really old.You just made me feel very old.
I object to that.By most objective measures, they have more talent than us.
Oir defense should keep us in the game even when our shots aren't falling. But scoring isn't our problem to me. Our defense is what gets us going and what will lead to wins. Especially for the freshman and guys that aren't used to our culture yet. Our defense leads to offense. And fast break points, I think will be key. Let's go! I can't wait! ️️First road games are dangerous especially for freshman. Could be some early jitters Friday, but I like our chances against anybody over the course of 40 minutes. Lots of weapons to throw at the opponents.
And there is Spoon in my Avatar. I am an old one now.If you can't remember Nick Weatherspoon, you are not old. Well, either that or really old.
Based on consensus rankings, would sustain your objection.I object to that.
You forgot the other scenario where we go 13-0 beating UCLA, Baylor, and Texas.Yeah, if we lose to Syracuse, I will be very alarmed. We simply have too much talent, IMO, to be dropping a home game to a team that lost to Colgate by double digits on their own court ... Leaving off the obvious extreme scenarios like going undefeated or really coming up short, I would rate our results before the New Year as follows:
HUGE Success: 12-1 (2-0) with our only loss to #5 Baylor (after beating #8 UCLA!) or #11 Texas ... in other words, we either go 2-0 in Vegas or we go 1-1 and beat Texas!
Excellent: 11-2 (2-0) with a 1-1 record in Vegas (beating UCLA) and losing to Texas
Very, Very Good: 11-2 (2-0) with a 1-1 record in Vegas (beating presumably #16 Virginia) and losing to Texas
Pretty Good: 10-3 (1-1) where we manage to go 1-1 in Vegas (picking up at least one ranked win), lose to Texas and slip up in our first conference road game at Maryland ... they for some reason own us, and we'll rebound!
Going worse than 10-3 would be a pretty serious underachievement, IMO, and we absolutely cannot afford home losses to Syracuse or Penn State (or likely even a neutral court loss to Mizzou) if we want to be a serious NCAAT threat ... which usually requires a good seed.