You mean like Cooper Flagg, Cameron Boozer, Stephen Castle and Paolo Banchero. We don't depend on Wagler any more than Duke and UCONN depend on their top Freshmen. While I understand the point, I don't think in today's game being a Freshman matters in terms of team pressure point.I hear what you're saying and I'm sure that I'm coming across as negative, but I've been worried about this for a long time. We were riding the coattails of a true freshman, who is not anywhere near developed. If anything, I've been throwing his teammates under the bus, because this shouldn't be the case. A freshman shouldn't have this type of stress on his shoulders. Here we are in March and let's be honest, he looks absolutely spent and I don't blame him. His efficiency has gone down and now the amount of shots he's getting up has gone down. Is it coincidence? Perhaps. Does he need to return to to January Keaton for this team to really make a push. Absolutely.
It is what it is at this point. He's the card we have to play and he's earned it. However, can be physically handle it. Time will tell.
Based on recent performance, we are much more likely to lose by 20 than win. I put the margin range at -20 to +6 if we meet Wisconsin this weekendYou think we’re losing to Wisconsin by 20 points?
And the win @Nebraska.We should elect to wear Navy Flyin’ Illini in the postseason. Haven’t lost in it since the UConn game in November, and it gave us the USC beat down the last time it was worn.
Needs to be the choice Friday.
What am I missing, what happened?On the first picture, watch #13’s leg/knee after Keaton makes that spin move.
Time to put up or shut up. Great guard play wins in March. If we are scared of Wisconsin we have a first weekend exit mindset.Hate that Wisconsin matchup. That's the team I least want to play after Michigan. Bad matchup as they don't really have guys we can cheat off to help on defense.
Another problem with the Quad system...USC at fuller strength early in the year is absolutely a Q1 level game. Them dropping to Q2 after many injuries doesnt change the quality of that win at the time. But of course resumes wont reflect that.Would love two USC wins to get them back to Quad 1, but that ain’t happenin’. We better be ready for the Badgers, and I hope the UC is full of orange!
What am I missing, what happened?
I agree 100000% that teams have had freshman take them all of the way to the finish line and I'm just now getting my hair back and off of blood thinners from KJ last year. You're all right that I'm not used to a guy from our team being able to do that, especially if the goal, at minimum(not me) is sweet 16 or bust.I guess this is what I don’t agree with. Your logic is basically a freshman can never be our best player — no ifs ands or buts about it. No matter how much anyone proves themselves, if you’re a freshman — end of discussion.
What about Flemings at Houston? Or Burries at Arizona? Or Acuff at Arkansas? All are in the same tier as Wagler in terms of dominant freshman (I’ll exclude the Dybantsa/Peterson/Boozer grouping just for the sake of it).
Maybe you are right, as Illinois hasn’t had that guy before. KJ seemed like a nice hopeful last year, but wasn’t great at the end. It’s just super obvious that Wagler is significantly more polished — just compare the assist to turnover and 3pt percentages (yes I get he hasn’t shot it well lately, still very impressive to be at 41%).
Keaton has TWO games this year with more than 3 turnovers. Kasparas had SIXTEEN.
He’s gotta be hurt or tired or probably both right? I’ve been concerned about BU running these top 8 guys into the ground, especially with Dre and Bos missing time. I was wanting Lee/Petro for at least 5-6 minutes a gameI agree 100000% that teams have had freshman take them all of the way to the finish line and I'm just now getting my hair back and off of blood thinners from KJ last year. You're all right that I'm not used to a guy from our team being able to do that, especially if the goal, at minimum(not me) is sweet 16 or bust.
My concern, as you are 100% right, it has been since the beginning of the year, is that he's going to wear down.
For me, yes, the shooting percentages are down, but that can happen. It's part of the deal given how we're constructed. However, it's his volume of shots that has gone down, he's not getting to the foul line as often because he's not taking it to the basket with authority and when he gets there, he's free throws SEEM to be coming up short(that is complete perception, I have no facts to prove that) and of significant importance, they're going right at him defensively and he doesn't seem to have an answer. He looks slow getting in front and stopping straight line drives, guys are getting to the bucket and finishing with relative ease, then he slaps vs really challenge and we're seeing "and ones" vs good hard fouls.
He's clearly become the opponents #1 assignment when we're on offense. They are blitzing him the second he gets the ball, which is VERY difficult to handle as a young guy, but as a guy with experience, he's sees it and recognizing if there's two guys on him and it's skip pass, one more skip and a wide open jumper for someone or a layup. The ball also seems to be sticking. It's dribble up top top while the shot clock runs down, then we get into the office. The whole did a lot of that was Skyy Clark(I am absolutely not comparing their games, it's not even close). He'd be 35 feet from the hoop and now it's a fire drill.
It is EXTREMELY possible that I'm more concerned about him because he carried us God darn near 3 months. He's been unreal and the NBA agrees. I also see that he's being leaned on and the tank looks to be running low. Having a limited schedule over the next couple of weeks could be just what the doctor ordered.
100%. I'll be at the game and I'm praying that I'm leaving session 6 without my face being red They definitely seem boom or bust, which is us and their bigs are a problem. They also have the quick as a mouse PG that we can have issues with.You do realize Wisconsin also just got their doors blown off against a terrible Oregon team, right?
Agreed, but this is the pick-your-poison of putting so much weight in analytics. It is billed as more objective (and in most ways, it is), but it will leave out some "common sense adjustments." As someone who works in valuation and quite obviously relies on data, analytics, math, etc. more than subjectivity in many ways, no "system" - no matter how sophisticated or well thought out - is worth a damn if it isn't being monitored, interpreted and critiqued by people with good background knowledge. I actually give the Committee props most years in that they do seem to try to use all of the computer rankings and whatnot as a way to wrap their heads around the resumes, but then I do imagine them having a lot of tough conversations that involve more subjective arguments for why teams should be seeded where they are.Another problem with the Quad system...USC at fuller strength early in the year is absolutely a Q1 level game. Them dropping to Q2 after many injuries doesnt change the quality of that win at the time. But of course resumes wont reflect that.
(This doesnt change for us, we played them while they were very injured)
"It's just this war and that lying SOB Johnson!!"Some folks don’t seem to have the psychological makeup to care about sports in a healthy way.
![]()
Go, Illini! Let’s rock out the postseason!![]()
Torvik ratings for E8 team vs this team:
23-24 team going into BTT: #13 overall, #4 offense, #76 defense
25-26 team going into BTT: #6 overall, #1 offense, #24 defense
23-24 team last 6 reg season games: #21 overall, #7 offense, #164 defense
25-26 team last 6 reg season games: #5 overall, #7 offense, #35 defense
The Quad system isn't analytics IMO. It may start with analytics (NET ranking), but then obscures it with something I guess the non-analytics crowd prefers. Why go through all that trouble when the various ranking systems tell a simpler and more accurate story?Agreed, but this is the pick-your-poison of putting so much weight in analytics. It is billed as more objective (and in most ways, it is), but it will leave out some "common sense adjustments." As someone who works in valuation and quite obviously relies on data, analytics, math, etc. more than subjectivity in many ways, no "system" - no matter how sophisticated or well thought out - is worth a damn if it isn't being monitored, interpreted and critiqued by people with good background knowledge. I actually give the Committee props most years in that they do seem to try to use all of the computer rankings and whatnot as a way to wrap their heads around the resumes, but then I do imagine them having a lot of tough conversations that involve more subjective arguments for why teams should be seeded where they are.
He pretty much nailed all of the concerns. Pretty sure that we all know that hoping to get hot and stay hot for 4 straight is extremely unlikely. What's mystifying is that when they do make an effort to pound the ball in the paint, they don't stick with. Working in the paint, then kicking it out is going go to create much better looks and it's much tougher to defend. They just won't stick with it and I'm not sure why.Nice article by Loren Tate on his Opinion where this team at going into March
Loren Tate | Illini gather themselves for March run
I agree in theory, but I was there for this particular game and was very close to the court. He lost a few he could have had both hands on easily.While I wholeheartedly agree that Z needs to work on securing the ball and keeping it elevated and out of the way of the floor rats, there are numerous times during the game where his height and length allow him to get a hand on the ball where most others don't even try as it is fruitless.
Save them for Saturday if you don’t want to do laundry.We should elect to wear Navy Flyin’ Illini in the postseason. Haven’t lost in it since the UConn game in November, and it gave us the USC beat down the last time it was worn.
Needs to be the choice Friday.
Some folks don’t seem to have the psychological makeup to care about sports in a healthy way.
![]()
Go, Illini! Let’s rock out the postseason!![]()
Terrific post.I don't get it, honestly? Wisconsin was our worst loss of the season... was a Q2 loss until yesterday, I believe. We were playing better when we took our worst loss of the whole season?
Illinois shot 5/24 from 3, that's what happened. We didn't play poorly overall.
21/31 (68% from 2)
21/26 (81% from FT line)
12 off rebs on 29 misses (41.4% off reb rate)
7 turnovers (3 below season average)
5 steals, 3 blocks
12 personal fouls (20 for Maryland)
What did you guys not see? Answer: 3 point shots swishing through the net.
Never take a road game for granted in big boy college basketball. UConn shot poorly on Saturday and took a 6 point loss vs an 11-19 Marquette team.
I honestly am starting to think it is just this style of play with the crashing the offensive glass that gives casual fans the heebie jeebies. Imagine turning on a basketball game and:
missed shot
offensive reb
missed shot
offensive reb
missed shot
offensive reb
made shot
The team scored 2 points on that possession, but to the casual observer you might as well put some circus music in the background and call it a blooper reel.
Honestly thinking we were playing better with two 13 ppg scorers out and taking our worst loss of the season is very wild take imo. Why can't we just admit Maryland (Andre Mills, in particular) played their hind ends off and we escaped a UConn vs Marquette type loss?