Too much "Do you want Groce back?!?!?" On here instead of holding people accountable who are being paid and backed as well as any team in the sport.Fact of the matter is this … I come into dang near every game thread and thread on this board to express my thoughts and opinions … That is what a message board is for … There is nothing on here I wouldn’t discuss with Brad … There is no personal beef between me and Brad … Never has been … I sometimes question his decisions and that’s just the way it is when you’re a coach …
I am not a booster … I am not Josh Whitman … I am simply someone who cares about Illinois athletics and wants to see sustained success and when we aren’t doing that, I call it out …
If you don’t agree or simply don’t like me which you have shown to be the case … Find the ignore button and use it … That way you don’t have to listen to me just like you say Brad shouldn’t …
Have a great day …![]()
I have also wondered about defensive effort/physicality taking its toll, but I think Kylan undermines that theory. He played 2 years in a highly rated P5 team where he had more or less the same role (secondary ball handler, defensive stopper). I realize every league is a little different but his adjustment to the BIG should have been the easiest of the bunch. Yet he’s had the biggest drop off.So this is where I'm at. I do see a lot of comments about "chucking" threes, but honestly, I actually think the quality of our threes has been relatively good. Sure, we've taken our fair share of rushed/bad shots, but I wouldn't call our average or overall shot quality from three bad at all this year. In fact, if anything, I think for the most part we have gotten our shooters open in space with good looks. We could always get some more inside out action to get the shots a bit more in rhythm, but the shots our guys are taking for the most part really aren't all that tough looks. I mean compare the 3pt looks we've gotten this year to 2023, those were baaaaaaaad shots. So I don't think it's a "chucking" threes issue as much as it is a we're just not making shots college shooters should be making problem. So if anything, it's a shooting threes problem.
As to the why this is happening to the entire team, where every upperclassman is having the worst shooting year of their career by a huge margin, it is bizarre. Mental for sure is part of it, but it could also be the increase in defensive effort and physical play necessary in the B10 is showing on players who just weren't prepared for that. We're front-rimming a very high percentage of our open threes and that usually points to tiring.
I mean, this is the falloff these players have seen this year:
Ben: 42.1% --> 34.8%
Jake: 40.6% --> 31.8%
Kylan: 38.2% --> 23.4%
Tre: 28.6% --> 23.8%
And it's not as though these players are getting worse quality shots. Most of the looks they get are decent. It is strange. I don't disagree that based on how poorly we're shooting the ball from 3, we need to focus more inside, but we also weren't really built to have the near 40% shooters we brought in passing up open threes. It's crazy when you don't have a single efficient player on your team from behind the arc.
It seems self perpetuating that we get lots of offensive rebounds because we miss 75 to 80% of 50% of our shots. In other words 50% of our shots are 3 pt and we miss 75% of them. Result, lots of offensive rebound opportunitiesI love analytics, but maybe the staff loves them a bit tooooo much. For instance...
Scenario 1: Opponent Player A shoots 22% from 3 on the season. He's only attempted 30 on the season. So, scouting report: Dare him to shoot, literally back up, waaayyyy off him. BUT, is he shooting 22% on the equivalent of an uncontested practice shot? I know 'contested' shots are recorded, but who determines what a 'contested' shot really is?
Scenario 2: We are a top rebounding team. Brad says: Shoot lots of 3's (Pts/Poss reasoning) and go get the misses. So, scouting report: We rebound better than our opponents, let's chuck up 3's. BUT, is this a case of more opportunities to get rebounds due to shooting 22% from 3?
These are low hanging fruit examples, and maybe not the best ones, but likely there are many others. Players/people are dynamic. Sickness, injury, pressure, hustle, heart, tenacity, "grit" etc. are hard to measure.
I know that the halftime tv analysts were as mystified as we are.Yes, at this point it is completely baffling. Outside of the 4 guys you listed:
KJ (4-28 for 14% since IU game)
Ivisic (3-16 for 18% since IU game)
DGL who shot 40% from 3 in a league with future NBA players had been hitting a few but is 0-6 last couple games as well
At this point I'm unsure why it isn't being talked about more than what is has been.
Funny thing is the players said that strategy was the scout against OSU. And what I take from that is our staff then changes our offensive plan against EVERY team. And while I understand why that's useful, it tells me we are more worried about changing what we do according to other teams than sticking to what we are actually good at and making them adjust...This is what’s bothering me the most …
How do we go from the ending of the Ohio State game where we figured out how we needed to play and driving the ball to win to immediately going back to chucking 3s again !!!!
In large part, IMO, due to how the B10 manages its games. He was called for more than one touch foul last night, and IMO that has taken away his aggressiveness on D and that has had a huge impact on that end of the floor for us. At the other end, he was fouled more than once with no call. It is a problem that this league will need to address if it desires another national champion. From all appearances over the last 25 years, they do not have that desire. They manage the games like they want to always have maximum number of teams make the field, not a smaller group of quality teams with higher seeds.I have also wondered about defensive effort/physicality taking its toll, but I think Kylan undermines that theory. He played 2 years in a highly rated P5 team where he had more or less the same role (secondary ball handler, defensive stopper). I realize every league is a little different but his adjustment to the BIG should have been the easiest of the bunch. Yet he’s had the biggest drop off.
Even with KJs struggles (I still firmly believe he’s playing hurt) we still win Nebraska and Rutgers easily if we manage to shoot a totally pedestrian 33% from 3 on a team full of shooters. As others have said it’s baffling.
good word. disagree with its use here though.. wouldn’t describe him as “obviously furious”. if anything i think people wish he was showing more emotion right nowToo much "Do you want Groce back?!?!?" On here instead of holding people accountable who are being paid and backed as well as any team in the sport.
I appreciate you speaking your truth. This program didn't get back on track by making excuses although many are happy to do so.
Nobody is whole for the entire season. FIND A WAY TO WIN.
Shooters aren't making 3s? Adjust your game plan.
Brad has stuck to NepoTy's offensive game plan for too long. Our adjustments have been "make more threes" the whole year.
Brad has looked apoplectic on the sideline all year...But we can't question whether the fire is gone without scrutiny..
That's not elite game planning....that's a cop out
As always, I appreciate the insight you share. I often find myself scrolling quickly looking for you, @LvilleILL1 @illini0440 and @DB11Headband only to find some inside info! lol. So, thanks to all of you! Myself, family and friends appreciate it because they often text me to ask things and I seem like an insider to them! lolFact of the matter is this … I come into dang near every game thread and thread on this board to express my thoughts and opinions … That is what a message board is for … There is nothing on here I wouldn’t discuss with Brad … There is no personal beef between me and Brad … Never has been … I sometimes question his decisions and that’s just the way it is when you’re a coach …
I am not a booster … I am not Josh Whitman … I am simply someone who cares about Illinois athletics and wants to see sustained success and when we aren’t doing that, I call it out …
If you don’t agree or simply don’t like me which you have shown to be the case … Find the ignore button and use it … That way you don’t have to listen to me just like you say Brad shouldn’t …
Have a great day …![]()
Totally fair. The BIG officiating is atrocious, particularly in its lack of consistency in what is/is not a foul not only game to game but play to play. I don’t watch a ton of other conference games but I don’t think the BIG is noticeably worse than any other league. In fairness it is a very hard job but I do think there have got to be ways to improve.In large part, IMO, due to how the B10 manages its games. He was called for more than one touch foul last night, and IMO that has taken away his aggressiveness on D and that has had a huge impact on that end of the floor for us. At the other end, he was fouled more than once with no call. It is a problem that this league will need to address if it desires another national champion. From all appearances over the last 25 years, they do not have that desire. They manage the games like they want to always have maximum number of teams make the field, not a smaller group of quality teams with higher seeds.
I'm not blaming the officiating for our play, but only trying to address Rockford's point about defensive effort and Kylan's regression - especially defensively. Officiating doesn't explain his dropoff in three point shooting percentage from 38% to 23%. Our lack of overall effort and piss poor shooting is squarely on our staff and players.
It worked better last year cause TSJ was a transformational player & Domask was pretty darn good (& a veteran) but TBH we are close to becoming a imitation version of Kentucky under Calipari. Lots of talent not coached up worth a crap & therefore the final product doesn't add up to as much as it should. Our offense has all the urgency of an AAU team just jacking up 3's. Very much a "I'll get mine, you get yours" mentality. Frankly sucks to watch.I know this doesn't make sense, but the Illinois basketball I've watched recently is the least enjoyable that I can remember. Not the worst ball by any means, but the least enjoyable. At least the teams in the John Groce-past were running offensive sets, and working on defense. They just weren't always all that talented. This team is definitely talented. But to watch them go out and chuck up 3's, trail every guy coming off a ball screen at the logo, and run next to no offense is just not fun to watch. Throw in very little attachment to a team of new players and it's actually kind of depressing. NIL is to blame for a lot of this, but the coaches shoulder most of the blame. I think the players are doing what they have been coached to do. They clearly haven't been taught an offense. Their defensive strategy has been shown to be ineffective. They are simply relying on their talent. That works sometimes(and we have looked great when it clicks) but you get a lot of down games.
We need to reset our whole strategy going forward. Get 2 new assistant coaches who know how to coach. Focus on bringing back DGL, Morez, Riley, and Ivicic. See if Ty is open to returning. Get back to developing a program as much as NIL will allow. I think some of this is going to happen. I worry that Brad is too stubborn to commit to overhauling it all.
Fact of the matter is this … I come into dang near every game thread and thread on this board to express my thoughts and opinions … That is what a message board is for … There is nothing on here I wouldn’t discuss with Brad … There is no personal beef between me and Brad … Never has been … I sometimes question his decisions and that’s just the way it is when you’re a coach …
I am not a booster … I am not Josh Whitman … I am simply someone who cares about Illinois athletics and wants to see sustained success and when we aren’t doing that, I call it out …
If you don’t agree or simply don’t like me which you have shown to be the case … Find the ignore button and use it … That way you don’t have to listen to me just like you say Brad shouldn’t …
Have a great day …![]()
i think the issue isn’t having him around but promoting him to a position that he was grossly underqualified for, likely passing over more deserving candidates in the process.Brad loves having his son around every day, especially after missing so much time coaching while Tyler was growing up. The father in me completely understands wanting to make up for lost time. Unfortunately, it also illustrates why mixing family and business can be risky nine times out of ten.
In the NIL era, it’s relatively easy to build a good program quickly, but just as easy to run it into the ground. We need to decide whether we’re satisfied with “good,” or if we want to aim for a year-after-year powerhouse, which is what we should be striving for.
First referee to be awarded an assist in live action.I was wondering when high knees-low skills ref Jeff would end up getting involved in a live ball action play and viola , last night he was the lead blocker for a RU drive to the rim for a layup..........he is always way to close to the action and he does it anywhere he is on the court.....his prancing around the court like he stepping on hot coals is tiresome and boring....Not a good ref at all , JMHO.............
I know this doesn't make sense, but the Illinois basketball I've watched recently is the least enjoyable that I can remember. Not the worst ball by any means, but the least enjoyable. At least the teams in the John Groce-past were running offensive sets, and working on defense. They just weren't always all that talented.
We aren't playing well, in fact we are playing real bad a large portion of the game, & it is definitely fair to question game prep and in game decisions; but seat warm is overstating it to me.And Brad ... Your seat is officially warm ... Top 10 paid coach ... Top 10 NIL ... Winning every other game ???? 1 deep tournament run in 8 years because TJ carried you there on his back ...
We aren't playing well, in fact we are playing real bad a large portion of the game, & it is definitely fair to question game prep and in game decisions; but seat warm is overstating it to me.
I think much of the disappointment this year is we forgot where we put ourselves with last year's push to maximize getting old & literaally going all in TJ's senior year. We went hard in with guys we knew wouldn't be back this year. Then we did a great job rebuilding with Freshman and transfers to the roster & expectations jumped, probably a bit too high. Some early signs of talent & showing the high ceiling pushed expectations sky high.
But Calipari is at Arkansas now because turning a team over every year isn't a path to consistent success. KJ/Riley/Morez/Ivisic are all Freshman (1st year college players). DGL is the only returnee, everyone else are transfers. Besides freshman looking like freshman, we have had a recent string of bad luck with KJ/Ivisic, then Ivisic turning his ankle just when he was starting to roll didn't help.
We added some talent and raised our ceiling above where most thought it should be last March, but by reloading so much this year and particularly with so many freshman a low floor was always in the picture. Hopefully, that reloading strategy pays off next year with a much higher floor; but in the meantime we still have a high ceiling & what now looks like bad luck may turn out to be a blessing yet this year...Ivisic is back, Morez has found a solid place on the floor, & the 2 bigs are playing well together to give us great paint presence to avoid the long 3 pt shooting droughts that are killing us, Riley is again showing signs of his potential, KJ is too good to keep playing this bad, DGL is emerging.
We aren't consistent, much of that is on coach, some of that is age/turnover which was a conscious decision for last season. But some of this talk is the higher expectations coach has given this program. Seat is warm is too much, IMO