Terrence Shannon Jr. reinstated

Status
Not open for further replies.
#251      
Will TJ be able to travel to the road games due to the bond he posted in Kansas? Don't want to be a downer, but is that still an issue for him to leave CU or the state of Illinois?

Looking forward to Sunday's game. I watched the Missouri game a few times since all this happened to see him in action...
He’s not in Kansas right now….if he wasn’t allowed to travel domestically he wouldn’t have been allowed to return to Illinois.
 
#253      
I have no idea if TS is guilty of any wrong doing, and either do any of you. NONE of us know these players besides the small speck we’re allowed to see, bow in toe. However, suspending him for being charged with something is wrong. It’s not an innocent-until-proven-guilty action.

In the “Beware what you wish for” category…

TS returning is likely to create a huge distraction. The road, especially, just got way more tough.
 
#256      
The Illini basketball roster page still says Shannon is suspended; however his NIL page is up now.
 
#257      
He’s not in Kansas right now….if he wasn’t allowed to travel domestically he wouldn’t have been allowed to return to Illinois.
This is good news. I know with some bail programs, the court requires you to stay in your local area, even if out of state. Thanks for putting this issue to rest. I was worried he would end up like that Michigan player and only be able to play home games for now...

I know many others have said it, but I'm grateful for people like you illini0440!
 
#259      
I think JW is an awesome AD, and I’m sure he was a good baby lawyer for the 1-2 years he practiced in DC at performing the junior level legal tasks he was assigned, but the view by many on here that because he has a law degree and practiced for less than 2 years (I think?) that he is some master legal mind that outmaneuvers the legal world is the stuff of a John Grisham book.
Quite a take here
 
#260      
If you don't think there's a difference between an accusation and an accusation that led to a charge/arrest, then we don't have much to discuss here.
While I agree with your general point here, your tone conveys that all charges meet at least some respectable standard that should warrant a suspicion of the accused person’s guilt … and I flat out reject that idea.
 
#262      
If you don't think there's a difference between an accusation and an accusation that led to a charge/arrest, then we don't have much to discuss here.
It's not that there's not a difference.... but what is still the same is that it remains an unproven allegation. The fact that a criminal charge exists only indicates that the investigators find the allegation to be credible. There is a huge gap between credible and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Nobody should be caught up in the fact that TSJ has been charged. Nobody should be criticized for believing the accuser or the accused. Both are positions that could be correct. Everyone should be bothered when somebody is punished before all of the evidence is presented and a legal determination is made. I have a problem when then University makes a legal determination based on charges. TSJ should not have to answer the University nor are they a competent investigative body. "More likely than not" to have committed the alleged crime is not an acceptable standard to deprive a student to participate in University activities. In the absence of a confession or videotaped evidence of a crime TSJ should be allowed to live his life. This includes playing basketball. I am sick of this nonsense of worrying about appearances and appeasing The mob. The University should not weigh in on an ongoing criminal investigation Let the process play out! Even the process is imperfect . It is possible that he could be wrongly convicted if innocent or wrongly exonerated if guilty but either way he deserves the presumption of innocence.
 
#263      
You know TSJ is going to have a raging fire inside him. That will 100% spread to his teammates. I wouldn't be surprised if he finished the season around 25PPG and still gets his AA status, along with B1G First Team. Edey has B1G POTY and Naismith locked up again. Thank goodness a sasquatch like that only comes around once a decade or so :ROFLMAO:
End of season awards are a combination of earned and media darling/popularity contests. I foresee some accolades taking into account the latter and snubbing. Hope I'm wrong.
 
#264      
Can confirm ... We do not run our program like Michigan does ... TJ is eligible for road games ...

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

giphy.gif
 
#265      
Who gives a damn about opposing fans reaction. Have you been to games?
This is one thing I do think our fanbase might be underestimating. There's really no preparation that's going to be enough for TSJ when he steps into an opposing arena. Watching the Patrick Kane sexual assault case take place in real time, how fans treated him was extremely harrowing even well after evidence was coming out that made it very clear he was wrongly accused. This included not only boos and jeers, but some vile outbursts like sing-song rapist chants amongst man others. It took an emotional toll on him, and he went through a pretty major character change. I'm not saying that TSJ isn't mentally strong or unable to keep out noise, but this is something that he has never experienced before. And that's not even mentioning that he has a serious court case over his head right now. It'd be surprising to me if he wasn't affected at all.

I like that he'll somewhat be eased back in with 3 home games along with @NW and @OSU, which aren't the most intimidating B10 arenas in his first 5 games. But @MSU and @Maryland in those next 3 games are going to be rough. Maryland especially. Anyone who knows that program knows what their fans do to opposing teams and players; you can all but expect jeers, threats, racism, and things thrown at him. There are bounds to a person's mental fortitude, and he's going to be tested hard. I think we all have to be aware and understanding of that because he may have some struggles in his return. That said, I think we have a good team around him to offer support when needed.
 
#266      
You know TSJ is going to have a raging fire inside him. That will 100% spread to his teammates. I wouldn't be surprised if he finished the season around 25PPG and still gets his AA status, along with B1G First Team. Edey has B1G POTY and Naismith locked up again. Thank goodness a sasquatch like that only comes around once a decade or so :ROFLMAO:
 
#267      
Any IANALs want to venture a guess at the odds of charges being dropped on 2/23 by the judge? IF no more compelling evidence is shown and the judge already doesn’t trust this DA … well, nothing wrong with a fool’s hope if you ask me.
 
#269      
Any IANALs want to venture a guess at the odds of charges being dropped on 2/23 by the judge? IF no more compelling evidence is shown and the judge already doesn’t trust this DA … well, nothing wrong with a fool’s hope if you ask me.
I am definitely NAL and I would guess the odds at 2 to 1. Also not staying at a Holiday Inn Express any time soon, so that could fluctuate either way. JMHO.....it really really is.
I L L
 
#270      
Any IANALs want to venture a guess at the odds of charges being dropped on 2/23 by the judge? IF no more compelling evidence is shown and the judge already doesn’t trust this DA … well, nothing wrong with a fool’s hope if you ask me.
I think it's likely if the TRO is permanent and Underwood plays Shannon. The only way this case works is if Shannon is pressured by being unable to play that he has to settle with the DA, giving Valdez something she can market as a win.
 
#272      
Same thing. He was charged and arrested because someone said he did something. What's the difference?
The difference is the policy specifically states they will suspend based on a criminal charge. Whereas it doesn't state that it will lead to suspension based on an accusation.

Where the university went wrong with this is that the policy itself has terms that protect the student that it did not allow to happen, in large part because the timing of the charges would have meant that review would have been ongoing during the basketball season.

So you have the situation where Terrence Shannon has been arrested for a violent crime, but the university by its own terms can't do anything until it allows the student to plead his case. They didn't allow that, in part because they knew the time between allegation and arrest was a period of months, and they were trying to appear to take this sort of thing seriously. So they jumped the gun.

THAT is why they shouldn't have suspended him, according to Judge Lawless.

Had the university followed its own terms, investigated the matter appropriately, allowed Terrence to present his case to them, they still could have suspended him completely irrespective of the results of the criminal case. But because they failed to do that, the court granted him an injunction.

Late edit: as the podcast pointed out, it's quite unlikely the injunction would have been granted to Luke Goode or AJ Redd. Because they couldn't say the same level of harm would be caused for them. Which means the university could have suspended them the exact same way, and it's possible a different form of relief is provided instead.
 
Last edited:
#274      
Any IANALs want to venture a guess at the odds of charges being dropped on 2/23 by the judge? IF no more compelling evidence is shown and the judge already doesn’t trust this DA … well, nothing wrong with a fool’s hope if you ask me.
IANAL, but I think the first week of February will be very telling. Lawrence has until 1/31 to hand over all key evidence in the case to TSJ's attorneys. I would expect his legal team to take to task anything that doesn't meet a legal level of scrutiny and be vocal about major shortcomings in the DA's case. It's going to get really loud if there's no additional evidence of value from what has already been leaked, and if that's the case, there indeed might be substantial pushback from the judge on 2/23.
 
#275      

frozenrope9190

Aurora, IL
I think its encouraging for the overall case that this judge granted the injunction using her ruling that the loss of income is not speculative. To me, if youre guilty and going to prison, you lose all your prospective basketball income, so she must feel that there are merits to his case being successful and that there is real money being lost by the continued suspension.

If the evidence was overwhelming, she might have ruled that the money lost was more speculative, because he was less likely to actually see it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.