The Illinois Coaching Search

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,102      

ILL in IA

Iowa City
So we know where CM can take Ill but have no idea what Keatts can do at a high major and you would rather have Keatts?

I understand people preferring Keatts but you have to recognize there is more risk involved there. Sure he may be the second coming and future HOF coach, but he could also flame out when he is tested at a much higher level.

Miller imo is the only legitimate candidate that I think is sure fire. Even that I could understand being argued against. At the very least you would think Martin would be able to elevate the program a step or two for the next coach.

My point was Cuonzo is a safe hire that in the long run doesn't elevate the program or get us back to the desired success we are wanting. That's just my opinion. So yeah. I'd rather go upside on Keatts.
 
#1,103      
If only we had an example of where we paid too much attention to these things.

Can anybody think of one?


Anyone?

The group think about not caring if someone can win outside their conference is interesting. What matters more, winning the Big Ten regular season or going to the Final Four? Beating the teams you're not supposed to beat matters. If you want to set your criteria at whoever wins in their conference that's definitely your prerogative, but in my opinion there's more to it than that.
 
#1,104      
Don't agree about Keatts, but Wade is interesting.

He has won tremendously in both his stops. Has an overall record of 50-19, great in conference records. Two trips to Ncaas in two years at VCU. Is bringing in a top 25 class next year in his second year (Mayan Kiir included). Only 34, seems like an up and comer. Has arguably done better than Keatts the last two years in a much tougher conference.
 
Last edited:
#1,106      

TownieMatt

CU Expat
Chicago
Will Wade. If we strike out with Marshall and Miller, Wade looks better than Cuonzo or Keatts.

Will Wade hasn't shown me enough. Two decent years at Chattanooga, then he's kept a solid VCU program about where it was for two seasons. Am I missing something there?
 
#1,107      

UofIChE06

Pittsburgh
My point was Cuonzo is a safe hire that in the long run doesn't elevate the program or get us back to the desired success we are wanting. That's just my opinion. So yeah. I'd rather go upside on Keatts.

Groce has had a lot of upside in the past as well. That's the problem with high risk high reward type candidates. Someone in the carousel thread talked about it in terms of probability. It is a relative certainty that Cuonzo will improve the program. It may not be to the level most want (multiple E8 some F4 etc) but he is highly likely to be able to be top 6 in the B1G and a staple in the NCAA tourney.

Keatts makes me more nervous about the future of the program than any of the names talked about the most. He may be amazing but you just don't know yet. If he was in his 5th year with the trajectory he is one it would be much better. Or if he was in a better conference... I don't think you can call the CAA mid-major.
 
#1,108      
Will Wade hasn't shown me enough. Two decent years at Chattanooga, then he's kept a solid VCU program about where it was for two seasons. Am I missing something there?

My argument was more about Wade being a more proven candidate on paper than Keatts. The obvious question is whether his record at VCU is more about Shaka than himself. But he has recruited very well there. Keep in mind several of he great Shaka's teams rode the bubble to just barely into the tournament as well. The point being if we miss on the proven commodities I feel Wade feels like less of a risk than Keatts. Wins at a similar clip in a tougher conference, has won a game in the NCAAT
 
#1,109      
What matters more, winning the Big Ten regular season or going to the Final Four?

It's not what matters more, it's what is more predictive of the future.

The intensively scouted grind, road atmospheres, and larger sample size of conference play is the biggest test.

It doesn't mean you ignore the other stuff by any means. Claiming those big scalps matters. But you view it in the broader context.
 
#1,110      

mattcoldagelli

The Transfer Portal with Do Not Contact Tag
The group think about not caring if someone can win outside their conference is interesting. What matters more, winning the Big Ten regular season or going to the Final Four? Beating the teams you're not supposed to beat matters. If you want to set your criteria at whoever wins in their conference that's definitely your prerogative, but in my opinion there's more to it than that.

I don't think you know what "groupthink" means.
 
#1,111      
Will Wade hasn't shown me enough. Two decent years at Chattanooga, then he's kept a solid VCU program about where it was for two seasons. Am I missing something there?

Young guy, good recruiter, winning in two places, playing an intriguing style.

We could do worse. I'd put him around that Cuonzo level. Keatts and Musselman would be higher on my list though.
 
#1,114      
It's not what matters more, it's what is more predictive of the future.

The intensively scouted grind, road atmospheres, and larger sample size of conference play is the biggest test.

It doesn't mean you ignore the other stuff by any means. Claiming those big scalps matters. But you view it in the broader context.

I agree that it definitely matters, but don't you think there is more to it (i.e. recruiting in the Midwest, sustained success longer than one recruiting class). I'm not going to be mad if Keatts is the guy, but it's a risky hire to me.
 
#1,116      

matt1all

Chicago, IL
I picked UNCW to make the Sweet16 to ensure they lose in the first round and they can keep the process moving, you're welcome Josh.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#1,117      

Deleted member 3875

D
Guest
This is probably accurate. Dee was having some health issues (hip replacement), but his departure was sudden and mysterious. Presumably something happened behind the scenes. Nothing has leaked about the situation, which makes sense when you consider that Dee is an iconic figure in Champaign and still a reference point for hoop heads everywhere. It's in everyone's best interest to keep whatever led to his dismissal/departure under wraps. Hope he lands on his feet. Love that guy.

Falcon Crestish
 
#1,118      
I'm not going to be mad if Keatts is the guy, but it's a risky hire to me.

Oh there's risk there for sure. But there's risk for anybody.

This idea of Cuonzo being "high floor" may be so, but if that floor is a bunch of frustrating NIT appearances, that's death anyway. That's no better in any meaningful way than Keatts turning into Todd Lickliter.

And I think Illinois Cuonzo just being Tennessee Cuonzo is a vastly likelier outcome than Keatts being a Lickliter.
 
#1,120      
Any of the former players "tossing their hat in the ring" worth while as assistants on the next coaches staff?

I posted a tongue in cheek post earlier about former players. Eddie Johnson is really interested in the job. there was a nice article about him a while back. I believe he wanted it before Groce was hired.
 
#1,121      

Deleted member 3875

D
Guest
I posted a tongue in cheek post earlier about former players. Eddie Johnson is really interested in the job. there was a nice article about him a while back. I believe he wanted it before Groce was hired.

Not HC material. Possibly Asst. capable but I'd rather see Deon Thomas or Roger Powell sitting alongside the right head coach.
 
#1,122      

TownieMatt

CU Expat
Chicago
Young guy, good recruiter, winning in two places, playing an intriguing style.

We could do worse. I'd put him around that Cuonzo level. Keatts and Musselman would be higher on my list though.

I suppose, but he wouldn't be high on my list. Especially given that Shaka has struggled so far at Texas.
 
#1,123      

Deleted member 3875

D
Guest
What about Bob McKillop, HC at Davidson? Solid. Respected. Wins.
 
#1,124      
Groce has had a lot of upside in the past as well. That's the problem with high risk high reward type candidates. Someone in the carousel thread talked about it in terms of probability. It is a relative certainty that Cuonzo will improve the program. It may not be to the level most want (multiple E8 some F4 etc) but he is highly likely to be able to be top 6 in the B1G and a staple in the NCAA tourney.

Keatts makes me more nervous about the future of the program than any of the names talked about the most. He may be amazing but you just don't know yet. If he was in his 5th year with the trajectory he is one it would be much better. Or if he was in a better conference... I don't think you can call the CAA mid-major.

....NO

I've already said it but I'll lay it out again. Groce before IL does not in any way equal what Keatts has done. Groce took a mediocre/okay program and KEPT it there. Besides the "caught lightning" sweet 16 run at the end, the conference record and overall body of work at Ohio was consistent with the coach preceding him. The conference records should have been a huge red flag.

Keatts on the other hand was handed the keys to a veritable dumpster fire and now they have won their conference twice in a row and are a 12 seed and the upset du jour for this tourney.
 
#1,125      

ILL in IA

Iowa City
Young guy, good recruiter, winning in two places, playing an intriguing style.

We could do worse. I'd put him around that Cuonzo level. Keatts and Musselman would be higher on my list though.

I'm with you on Musselman. I remember you posting about him a while ago and have been reading up. I'd be good with him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.