247sports.com
This will become the most used GIF in loyalty history going forward right?
| Thursday, January 11, 2024 |
14
respm Response to Motion/Petition Thu 01/11 11:24 PMRESPONSE to Motion re10 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Defendants Timothy Killeen, The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois.(Land, Peter) |
| Att: 1
Exhibit 1-Declaration of Geoff Alexander, |
| Att: 2
Exhibit 2-Declaration of Josh Whitman, |
| Att: 3
Exhibit 3-Declaration of Ryan Squire, |
| Att: 4
Exhibit 4-Declaration of Danielle Fleenor, |
| Att: 5
Exhibit 5-Declaration of Robert Wilcynski, |
| Att: 6
Exhibit 6-Unpublished case-Robertson v. Bd. of Trs. of Kent State Univ. |
If anyone could summarize specifically what the docs re: GA and JW say I will give you my beach house.I think we should be prepared for the fact that we likely won't get a ruling today as the judge and clerks will have to write it. I'd love to read u of I response as there were some interesting declarations attached. I can't use my firms pacer account but invite others to do so and circulate !!
Thursday, January 11, 2024 14
RESPONSE to Motion re10 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Defendants Timothy Killeen, The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois.(Land, Peter)Att: 1 Att: 2 Att: 3 Att: 4 Att: 5 Att: 6
The TRO will be denied. The injunction in a few weeks is then more important decision, but the TRO decision today will be at least somewhat telling as to how the judge perceives TJ’s case.
How do you know the TRO will be denied?
Honestly, the bandwidth limit exceeded jpeg, while apparently a mistake, is incredibly apt as quite literally everyone refreshes this page for news today lol.
The Seventh Circuit uses a sliding scale test evaluating injunctions. Shannon has advanced several grounds to grant relief. First he sues under 1983 and claims his right to procedural due process has been violated. He also claims a violation of Title 9, a breach of an express contract, breach of an implied contract, and waiver. His last three arguments are weak.He must show a likelihood of success on the merits of one of those claims. If his harm is severe, the need for success on the merits diminishes.
Is that because you think the judge will feel that the harm of keeping him suspended for "just" a few more weeks isn't that big of a deal?
As a non-attorney who works with attorneys on a daily basis they generally refuse to give you odds. If you push them they will say 50/50. As far as I know there is not a precedent case like this, so an attorney has no clue on the outcome.
Agree with most of this but I think there is a pretty good shot on the tro. The tro is going to be more focused on the irreparable harm of which there is plenty. He gets to suit up for a couple games. Not the end of the world for either side. The injunction yes that will focus more on and get much more detail on the substantive evidence. Dropping of the charges I simply do not see that happening unless there is some evidentiary change or more pressure is put on from outside the Shannon camp. A preliminary hearing can be a wild card. As others have noted, it is unusual to get a finding of no probable cause at a preliminary hearing. At a preliminary hearing the DA normally gets the benefit of the doubt. The DA and the presiding judges have to work together every day. But here. Way too many moving pieces. This DA has made a cottage industry of publicly insulting the judges her office has to work with every day. She is going to get disciplined for her misdeeds. Want another public spanking then find no probable cause at the preliminary hearing
I always appreciate your insights , mrh vet
I love your optimism, but from a PURE BASKETBALL standpoint(human reality aside)....time is going by quickly. By the end of January, we're what, 10 conference games in? When we start talking about the upcoming WEEKS...geeze, we're only six weeks until March.
