UCLA 95, Illinois 94 OT Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#876      
YearSeedFinal Round ReachedExpected RoundOutcome vs. Expectation
1981#4Sweet SixteenSweet SixteenPerformed as expected
1983#7First RoundRound of 32Underperformed
1984#2Elite EightElite EightPerformed as expected
1985#3Sweet SixteenSweet SixteenPerformed as expected
1986#4Second RoundSweet SixteenUnderperformed
1987#3First RoundSweet SixteenUnderperformed
1988#3Second RoundSweet SixteenUnderperformed
1989#1Final FourFinal FourPerformed as expected
1990#5First RoundRound of 32Underperformed
1993#6Second RoundRound of 32Performed as expected
1994#8First RoundRound of 32Underperformed
1995#11First RoundRound of 64Performed as expected
1997#6Second RoundRound of 32Performed as expected
1998#5Second RoundRound of 32Performed as expected
2000#4Second RoundSweet SixteenUnderperformed
2001#1Elite EightFinal FourUnderperformed
2002#4Sweet SixteenSweet SixteenPerformed as expected
2003#4Second RoundSweet SixteenUnderperformed
2004#5Sweet SixteenRound of 32Overperformed
2005#1National ChampionshipFinal FourOverperformed
2006#4Second RoundSweet SixteenUnderperformed
2007#12First RoundRound of 64Performed as expected
2009#5First RoundRound of 32Underperformed
2011#9Second RoundRound of 64Performed as expected
2013#7Second RoundRound of 32Performed as expected
2021#1Second RoundFinal FourUnderperformed
2022#4Second RoundSweet SixteenUnderperformed
2023#9First RoundRound of 64Performed as expected
2024#3Elite EightSweet SixteenOverperformed
2025#6Second RoundRound of 32Performed as expected


CategoryCount
Overperformed3
Performed as expected14
Underperformed13

This is the summary I got from Wikipedia- note I'm not sure I count being a #1 seed and making the NC as an overperform because two #1 seeds should make it, but that's splitting hairs.
 
#877      
It you genuinely want to understand where another fan's mindset comes from, you have to acknowledge their experience. 40 years is just not that long ago for some of us. And that 1984 loss in the Elite Eight to Kentucky in Rupp Arena is not something fans forget.

Argue stats and relevance of eras all you want, but fandom is fundamentally about emotions. The strongest of which probably developed while attending Illinois many years ago. Fans are allowed to be frustrated by a historic loss. Whether it was Kentucky 40 years ago or UCLA last weekend.
 
#878      
My expectations vs. performance have very little to do with the NCAA Tourney (I realize I'm in the minority here). In my mind, Brad Underwood has overperformed with Illini basketball. His teams have become nationally relevant. The past 6 seasons, his record is 140-58 (71%) overall and 81-36 (69%) in one of the toughest leagues in the country and playing one of the toughest non-conference schedules. Included have been 1 outright regular-season championship and 2 BTT titles as well as an Elite Eight appearance for only the 5th time in the past 42 years. His teams have been highly entertaining, including changing styles of play year-to-year, and they've been winners. Sign me up for this every season, even including the occasional disappointment.
IMG_1171.gif
 
#879      
Ah, so you're one of those that if we don't win the national championship then you didn't have a good time types of fans

No judgment, just helps explain things
why can't their be shades of grey. not everything is all or none and people can value different achievements and failures on their own scales. I think you took this a bridge too far.

also people's scale of achievement is allowed to evolve over time as things change. finishing top 6 in the big ten doesn't mean much to me now but it did before. finishing top 4 this year is nice but but really moving my needle.... it's aligned with my preseason expectations but my expectations for this team have increased during the year after watching them play. both of these can exist at the same time
 
#880      
The goal every year is final four and hopefully someday we will win a national championship.

That’s the goal every year!

I think we are “this close” to having what it takes.
 
#881      
why can't their be shades of grey. not everything is all or none and people can value different achievements and failures on their own scales. I think you took this a bridge too far.

also people's scale of achievement is allowed to evolve over time as things change. finishing top 6 in the big ten doesn't mean much to me now but it did before. finishing top 4 this year is nice but but really moving my needle.... it's aligned with my preseason expectations but my expectations for this team have increased during the year after watching them play. both of these can exist at the same time

Oh trust me I’d love to see more grey area than we lost = everything’s bad or we won = everything’s slightly less bad but we have to fix this and this and this.

He did say he’s been watching Illini for years and it’s yet to manifest into success. So I guess I took that literally, that even the F4 years weren’t a “success” in that particular persons view.
 
#882      
Oh trust me I’d love to see more grey area than we lost = everything’s bad or we won = everything’s slightly less bad but we have to fix this and this and this.

He did say he’s been watching Illini for years and it’s yet to manifest into success. So I guess I took that literally, that even the F4 years weren’t a “success” in that particular persons view.
l think of you adjust it to second weekend or elite 8 then you are there. if we each an elite 8 I think we all can universally call this a success even if we don't win the big ten tourney. sweet 16 should be our floor... we are going to be a top 8 metric and resume team by selection Sunday so that's fair to expect
 
#884      
It you genuinely want to understand where another fan's mindset comes from, you have to acknowledge their experience. 40 years is just not that long ago for some of us. And that 1984 loss in the Elite Eight to Kentucky in Rupp Arena is not something fans forget.

Argue stats and relevance of eras all you want, but fandom is fundamentally about emotions. The strongest of which probably developed while attending Illinois many years ago. Fans are allowed to be frustrated by a historic loss. Whether it was Kentucky 40 years ago or UCLA last weekend.

I’m not arguing experience at all. The whole picture shapes your entire fandom.

But in the context of Brad underwood? Do I think lumping in a 1984 elite 8 loss is overly fair to how I evaluate if he’ll underachieve this march?
 
Last edited:
#885      
What I was expecting was to have a real shot at Big Ten regular season title and a high seed (yes, 2-3 seed).

As is stands, we have no shot at the regular season title, may not even get the double bye in the B1G tournament, and we have to win against the league leading #3 team in the country or we are looking at 3-4 seed.

Does that meet your expectations?
The total spree of doom and gloom comments in certain post histories 😂
What I was expecting was to have a real shot at Big Ten regular season title and a high seed (yes, 2-3 seed).
Who exactly is it (outside of the doom and gloomers here) that said that’s out the window? All the reputable people/services still have Illinois as a 2seed, at worst a 3seed (but mostly a 2).
As is stands, we have no shot at the regular season title, may not even get the double bye in the B1G tournament, and we have to win against the league leading #3 team in the country or we are looking at 3-4 seed.
Double bye or Triple bye?

Either way, I think this post summed it up quite well:

IMG_0384.jpeg
 
Last edited:
#886      
But in the context of Brad underwood? Do I think lumping in a 1984 elite 8 loss is overly fair to how I evaluate if he’ll underachieve this march?
March hasn't happened yet. And what has fair got to do with anything in College Basketball? Brad is a big boy who is paid more in a year than most earn in a lifetime. And more than all but 13 of his peers. He just needs to win.
 
#887      
I watched the 2024 Illini closely with TSJ and Mr. Booty Ball. The 2026 Illini are a better-balanced team (much better offense, slightly worse defense). That should excite us. UConn was a generational team with Stephon Castle and Donovan Clingan (who was pinning TSJ dunk attempts at the apex). That UConn team looked more dominant than any team we’ve seen since in 2025 or this year.
No? Like, not even close.

The 2024 team finished 80th in defensive efficiency:

IMG_0386.jpeg


This team is 29th:

IMG_0387.jpeg
 
#888      
Also go back and watch Kofi highlights. I get that his playstyle worked well against inferior opponents and in physical B1G games especially with Ayo still around. But my god his lack of quickness was glaring in the 2022 NCAA game vs. Houston. So, so clunky.

I watched the 2024 Illini closely with TSJ and Mr. Booty Ball. The 2026 Illini are a better-balanced team (much better offense, slightly worse defense). That should excite us. UConn was a generational team with Stephon Castle and Donovan Clingan (who was pinning TSJ dunk attempts at the apex). That UConn team looked more dominant than any team we’ve seen since in 2025 or this year.

We should be excited. The issues we’re having with Fears, Dent, and likely Cadeau in the regular season and likely again in the BTT will give us us a ton of game tape to manage that Achilles heel in the NCAAs.

There aren’t a ton of amazing 3-pt shooting big men among Arizona, Michigan, and Duke. So we can likely stay in the game and not get blown out like vs. UConn in the E8 game. Question is how do we handle quick guards - that will determine how far we go.
So we are calling our first team all-American clunky. Things I never thought I would read for $500
 
#891      
What I was expecting was to have a real shot at Big Ten regular season title and a high seed (yes, 2-3 seed).

As is stands, we have no shot at the regular season title, may not even get the double bye in the B1G tournament, and we have to win against the league leading #3 team in the country or we are looking at 3-4 seed.

Does that meet your expectations?
You sir are awarded the coveted five Eeyores for your dispair.

You are correct that we did not win the B1G regular season title after ScUM cinched it last night. We will get at LEAST a double bye for the bTT, we do want to win vs ScUM to insure a 2 (an even possibly a 1 seed), and will not fall to a 4 seed, although a 3 is possible if a complete collapse occurs (prob. < 0.1%) on the Formician scale.
sad winnie the pooh GIF
sad winnie the pooh GIF
sad winnie the pooh GIF
sad winnie the pooh GIF
sad winnie the pooh GIF
 
#892      
Also go back and watch Kofi highlights. I get that his playstyle worked well against inferior opponents and in physical B1G games especially with Ayo still around. But my god his lack of quickness was glaring in the 2022 NCAA game vs. Houston. So, so clunky.

I watched the 2024 Illini closely with TSJ and Mr. Booty Ball. The 2026 Illini are a better-balanced team (much better offense, slightly worse defense). That should excite us. UConn was a generational team with Stephon Castle and Donovan Clingan (who was pinning TSJ dunk attempts at the apex). That UConn team looked more dominant than any team we’ve seen since in 2025 or this year.

We should be excited. The issues we’re having with Fears, Dent, and likely Cadeau in the regular season and likely again in the BTT will give us us a ton of game tape to manage that Achilles heel in the NCAAs.

There aren’t a ton of amazing 3-pt shooting big men among Arizona, Michigan, and Duke. So we can likely stay in the game and not get blown out like vs. UConn in the E8 game. Question is how do we handle quick guards - that will determine how far we go.

I think there are two general vulnerabilities this team has in match-ups, as well as the issue every team has with off shooting nights.
1) athletic teams have been able to make runs and get more stops. At the Illini's best, they overcome this with the wide variety of weapons, good decisions, and good movement.
2) let-downs in play. I think there were glaring effort differences in the teams that have come back against us. This team has a high ceiling, but they're 2-3 in their last 5, and the 3 losses were all bad close-outs. Up 23 is particularly hard to stomach. Tourney teams will play desperation, and I'd feel a helluva lot better if I saw this team stepping on the gas and getting more experience on how you close out games.

Was this a stretch where there was a let-down over a long season, or is it the sign of a team that's more tired than hungry? I think the losses can actually help us because of how they exposed weaknesses, but going into the tourney hungry is something I worry about due to history. The one E8 run isn't enough to make me think this year will be like that.
 
#893      
Barring a complete collapse, I cannot see the Illini worse than a #3 seed. Can’t imagine the committee would want to make a #1 seed play a team in the Sweet 16 that came thisclose to a B1G title (3 OT losses and a buzzer-beater) and has the metrics the Illini have.
 
#894      
Barring a complete collapse, I cannot see the Illini worse than a #3 seed. Can’t imagine the committee would want to make a #1 seed play a team in the Sweet 16 that came thisclose to a B1G title (3 OT losses and a buzzer-beater) and has the metrics the Illini have.
If we end up a 3 seed while 4th in kenpom we are going to Loyola a 1 seed.
 
#896      
In that respect, a #3 is the same as a #2 in that neither would play a #1 until the Elite Eight. But to your main point, I think the Illini are a team the top seeds would rather not see given the offensive potential of the Illini.
Sorry - 6 NCAA tournament teams (21% of Illinois games) have figured Illinois out and left Illinois fans explaining away each loss. IMO only on here is Illinois as revered and feared.
 
#897      
Sorry - 6 NCAA tournament teams (21% of Illinois games) have figured Illinois out and left Illinois fans explaining away each loss. IMO only on here is Illinois as revered and feared.

4 of the 6 losses (or times we’ve been “figured out”) involved Illinois playing without one of its best players, or in some cases without multiple of their best players. This is not an insignificant thing. We even beat two top 5 teams in road games while missing players.

if you choose to ignore that player availability actually matters then rest on the fact that most of the teams in the tournament will have been “figured out” far more than Illinois has.
 
#899      
I mean, the national media sure seems to be higher on Illinois than many folks on here:


IMMEDIATELY thought the same thing lol

Go listen to whatever national show you'd like and you will hear about Illinois being a F4 team

Come here and read this message board and you'd think we are a 7 seed

"only on here is Illinois revered and feared" lmfao yea right more like "only on here is Illinois thought of as an also-ran"
 
#900      
Like all of us will be watching and waiting for good March results. Hope I am not saying I told you so after another year knocked out the first weekend.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back