UConn 74, Illinois 61 Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#476      
I've watched our Illini and several other teams play on courts with the NBA line, it seems like everyone is shooting from deeper than they otherwise would once that line is there.

Might just be habit of getting behind the furthest line, or guys trying to show the next level that can shoot that shot, who knows, but it definitely influences how teams play offense, and where defenses pick guys up.
Muscle memory is absolutely a thing.
Physically and mentally disorienting on the court.
Like I said, we didn’t bring it yesterday to get it done. Factors played a role in that as well.
 
#477      
Ty would've made a huge difference because he would've replaced one of the bigs jacking 3s and Ty would've been cutting, offensive rebounding, and playing defense. Its not just what he brings, but what we would've got off the floor.
True. On the other hand, Ty often found himself on the bench in late game situations precisely because he couldn't shoot. Defenders wouldn't guard him, leaving us playing 4 on 5 when he was on the floor. Pick your poison.
 
#478      
I have been preaching this for a few years, we have no offensive scheme. Just a lot of ISO and platters standing around. If Weber could recruit we would not have fallen at all as his offense is what we need. Constant movement and flow. Made defenses work which tires them out. We are rarely making the D work. Tyler is so far under water here. He needs to go somewhere and learn how an efficient offense works. Brad. Is so blinded and ignorant of how to develop a championship caliber team
 
#479      
I don’t think we’ve had a huge talent advantage over any of those teams.

They didn’t bench KJ but they had him play more off the ball. So it’s not the change you wanted to see, but it’s a change, and hard for me to want to “bench” one of our best (if not our very best) players. Andrej was miserable yesterday, and you can’t bench everyone because you have to put 5 guys on the floor.
There's a certain % of Illini fans who year-in and year-out overrate our talent. It's one of the most obnoxious things for me as a fan.
 
#480      
Whenever we made a run, they had a play drawn up. They were screening off the ball, screening for screeners, and almost always ended up with something at the rim with minimal contest.
Luke Murray is going to be the Ben Johnson of college basketball coaches.
 
#481      
Hurley basically said their game plan was to stop Stojakovic from penetrating and keep Mirkovic off the boards. He gave the obligatory ’Illinois is a great shooting team…he mentioned Boswell is a great player…team has a high ceiling…blah, blah, blah’.

Reading between the lines it sounded to me like he was saying: Boswell is going to get his. We can’t let Andrej get 20 and get to the line 10 times or Mirk get 10 boards and score in the paint. Shut them down and let the other guys beat us. He even said if we made more threes we probably win. I think he made a reasonable gamble knowing history says we don’t shoot the ball all that well.

Isn’t that a fairly reasonable (if not very expected) gameplan? And if so, doesn’t our coaching staff kind of know that? Does anyone say:
‘If they try to take away player X, we’re gonna do this…’
‘If they take away X number of shots from Andrej, who gets them? How do we make up those X number of shots?’

This is what frustrates me about the coaching. Teams seem to do exactly what we would expect them to do and we don’t have an answer. Or the answer is shoot more threes, which is not our strong suit.
 
#483      
Hurley basically said their game plan was to stop Stojakovic from penetrating and keep Mirkovic off the boards. He gave the obligatory ’Illinois is a great shooting team…he mentioned Boswell is a great player…team has a high ceiling…blah, blah, blah’.

Reading between the lines it sounded to me like he was saying: Boswell is going to get his. We can’t let Andrej get 20 and get to the line 10 times or Mirk get 10 boards and score in the paint. Shut them down and let the other guys beat us. He even said if we made more threes we probably win. I think he made a reasonable gamble knowing history says we don’t shoot the ball all that well.

Isn’t that a fairly reasonable (if not very expected) gameplan? And if so, doesn’t our coaching staff kind of know that? Does anyone say:
‘If they try to take away player X, we’re gonna do this…’
‘If they take away X number of shots from Andrej, who gets them? How do we make up those X number of shots?’

This is what frustrates me about the coaching. Teams seem to do exactly what we would expect them to do and we don’t have an answer. Or the answer is shoot more threes, which is not our strong suit.
The thing is they never took anything away. Stojakovic missed layups, everyone on the roster missed wide open looks...... he's right, if we make open threes, it's a different game.

There was no change in game plan needed. Knock down the GD free throws vs Bama, knock down the GD shots you're paid to make vs UConn and everyone feels differently.

Some of these guys are paid 7 figures to make those. It's their job and the level of difficulty was not high.
 
#484      
The thing is they never took anything away. Stojakovic missed layups, everyone on the roster missed wide open looks...... he's right, if we make open threes, it's a different game.

There was no change in game plan needed. Knock down the GD free throws vs Bama, knock down the GD shots you're paid to make vs UConn and everyone feels differently.

Some of these guys are paid 7 figures to make those. It's their job and the level of difficulty was not high.
He missed contested layups, I agree. Which seemed to lead to some frustration which led to Underwood chewing his a$$ out, and arguably our best player sitting the bench for the last five minutes. Hurley had to be eating that up.

And yea, we did miss open shots that need to be made. But we do that in about every game we play, including all of last year.

If we have hot shooting it’s great. If we don’t, we don’t always seem to have a plan B, is all I’m saying.
 
#485      
I had to go back and watch and the Underwood --> Stojakovic butt chewing happened at the 17:08 mark in the 2nd half.

Watched it like 5x just now, didn't look terribly out of the ordinary to me, seemed like something that happens every game idk.

As far as the context, I can't be exactly sure and am not great at reading lips, but the previous 3-4 possessions Andrej just stood there and watched everyone else fight for rebounds.
 
#486      
There's a certain % of Illini fans who year-in and year-out overrate our talent. It's one of the most obnoxious things for me as a fan.
If you think that "certain %" is anything less than 100, there's a bridge to Illini-shortcomings in Brooklyn that I will let you have for heck of a deal.
 
#487      
I really, really hate complaining about the refs. Bad calls even out in the long run.

But this call really gets me. The refs had the opportunity to rehash all of the shot clock issues (they couldn't review the over-the-back, but no matter). They spent a long time going over everything, and presumably did so in meticulous detail, and they still got it wrong. How is that even possible? Is there any explanation other than ref bias? Mind you, I don't buy the bias argument for even a second, but what is the real answer? A shot hit the rim, Conn got the board and the clock reset to 20 and the Conn guy eventually made an impossible shot. So, there should one and only one question: How much time passed between Conn getting the board and the ball leaving the shooters hand. Less than 20 seconds? Shot is good. More than 20 seconds? Shot is no good.

I watched an unedited game replay and I can see no way the ball left his hands within 20 seconds. So, how do we get there from here?

PS. We probably lose in any case, but we would all feel better with a 4 or 5 point loss when our late game momentum fell short than with a 13 point loss following a complete momentum killer.

PSS. Have the Connecticut boards spent much time on this? Probably not. It is human nature not to care much when the mistake is in your favor.
I agree with you- this bad call is hard to get over given how much time they reviewed it and still completely blundered it and it’s such a huge swing- down 7 with the ball while you are on a run with 2:10 left vs down 11 and the game is over

The other aspect I haven’t heard discussed is that Davis seemed to be giving a foul because the shot clock reset and Smith saw that and just threw the ball up- if the shot clock wasn’t incorrectly reset he wouldn’t have tried to foul him!! How can you just count that play when it was under false conditions!!! If anything give UConn the ball with 2 seconds on the clock when it incorrectly reset- I don’t see any logic to just count the foul and bucket
 
#488      
He missed contested layups, I agree. Which seemed to lead to some frustration which led to Underwood chewing his a$$ out, and arguably our best player sitting the bench for the last five minutes. Hurley had to be eating that up.

And yea, we did miss open shots that need to be made. But we do that in about every game we play, including all of last year.

If we have hot shooting it’s great. If we don’t, we don’t always seem to have a plan B, is all I’m saying.
I agree with you and it's a personnel issue, not a coaching issue. Our bigs are allergic to the paint and don't play through contact. They weren't brought here to do that. BU wanted this to be a 1 in, 4 out offense, which means surround the floor with shooters. The scheme works, but the execution hasn't.

Now, I'm not one who likes the European style of ball. It works in the NBA because they're the best shooters on the planet. The college game doesn't get that, so the efficiency obviously isn't going to be there.

On the flip side, giving guys the green light helps recruiting. NBA caliber players love this style and that is supposedly the type of talent we have.

I'm not seeing it YET(I am emphasizing YET). I see slow, unathletic and overrated with regards to skill.
 
#489      
If you think that "certain %" is anything less than 100, there's a bridge to Illini-shortcomings in Brooklyn that I will let you have for heck of a deal.
Ha! There are some reasonable ones out there, but most fans (not just ours) tend to overrate their teams' talent.
 
#490      
He missed contested layups, I agree. Which seemed to lead to some frustration which led to Underwood chewing his a$$ out, and arguably our best player sitting the bench for the last five minutes. Hurley had to be eating that up.

And yea, we did miss open shots that need to be made. But we do that in about every game we play, including all of last year.

If we have hot shooting it’s great. If we don’t, we don’t always seem to have a plan B, is all I’m saying.

“Hurley has to be eating that up” - isn’t the final minutes with Andrej out when we made our run?

Not totally directed at you, but this is where the “make adjustments!” crowd loses me. Andrej was bad yesterday, we went to as you say, a Plan B, performed better, and now you’re upset Andrej was out.
 
#491      
He missed contested layups, I agree. Which seemed to lead to some frustration which led to Underwood chewing his a$$ out, and arguably our best player sitting the bench for the last five minutes. Hurley had to be eating that up.

And yea, we did miss open shots that need to be made. But we do that in about every game we play, including all of last year.

If we have hot shooting it’s great. If we don’t, we don’t always seem to have a plan B, is all I’m saying.
I agree with the idea of plan B from an offensive standpoint.
 
#492      
My two cents:
1. If UConn shoots threes like that, they'll never lose another game.
2. It may seem peculiar to say so, but I thought we defended the arc better than they did. We had great perimeter ball movement, leading to oh so many wide open looks. But we only made 20%. It's disheartening to move the ball with that much purpose, then come up empty.
3. Boswell was the best player on the court, and I'm including both teams. Thru hard work and belief in himself, he has become that rarest of birds--the complete player. And that for sure includes leadership. Needless to say, he does have talent.
4. I can't see things getting any easier as we go forward.
5. Many posters here are going overboard, which I expected to see. There's actually no armageddon, guys.
In comparison to Illini UConn shot 3 well. UConn shot 35.7% from 3 to UI's 20.7%. UConn also hit 41.3% of their FG's compared to 31.7% for Illinois. UConn outrebounded Illini 43-38/ UConn had same TO's as Illini, 10, but UConn had nearly twice the assists 19 to 10. Illini were 17-18 from FT while UConn was 12-17. UConn had big edge in steals and a couple more blocks than Illini. Illini mostly shot the ball horribly and did not guard UConn very well.
 
#493      
I agree with you and it's a personnel issue, not a coaching issue. Our bigs are allergic to the paint and don't play through contact. They weren't brought here to do that. BU wanted this to be a 1 in, 4 out offense, which means surround the floor with shooters. The scheme works, but the execution hasn't.

Now, I'm not one who likes the European style of ball. It works in the NBA because they're the best shooters on the planet. The college game doesn't get that, so the efficiency obviously isn't going to be there.

On the flip side, giving guys the green light helps recruiting. NBA caliber players love this style and that is supposedly the type of talent we have.

I'm not seeing it YET(I am emphasizing YET). I see slow, unathletic and overrated with regards to skill.
I watch a fair amount of NBA ball. And to my untrained eye there is a lot more movement and cutting away from the ball which I fail to see in this Illinois offense.
 
#494      
Ty would've made a huge difference because he would've replaced one of the bigs jacking 3s and Ty would've been cutting, offensive rebounding, and playing defense. Its not just what he brings, but what we would've got off the floor.
Who knows Ty may become the x factor on why we make a deep run in the tournament after being up and down all year.
 
#495      
I watch a fair amount of NBA ball. And to my untrained eye there is a lot more movement and cutting away from the ball which I fail to see in this Illinois offense.
With Petrovic, Boswell, Wagler, Mirkovic, Stojakovic and Tomislav, Illini have a lot of good passers and great cutters and drivers to the hoop. Why the offense doesn't have more movement, cutting and crisp passing, I am truly baffled. UConn does a much better job at that.
 
#497      
With Petrovic, Boswell, Wagler, Mirkovic, Stojakovic and Tomislav, Illini have a lot of good passers and great cutters and drivers to the hoop. Why the offense doesn't have more movement, cutting and crisp passing, I am truly baffled. UConn does a much better job at that.
Agreed, Tomi and Mirkovic are both really crafty passers, they could be a menace together in the paint.

Petrovic has shown he can get past the defense, but when he does and there's no one to pass to, it was all risk with no reward.

Over Underwood's tenure, we average 740 3s a season. Which felt really low to me. That was dragged down by the Ayo years when he would take a lot of midrange shots. His last year we only took 524 3s. If you take out the Ayo's Soph and Jr year when we had Ayo and Kofi, we average 805 3s a season. Last year we took 992, and we're currently on pace to take 986 if we play 34 games.

We've got some pretty good half court players that could run an offense with a lot of versatility, but instead we just shoot 3s or drive with pretty much nothing in between.
 
#498      
McCasland is a really good coach. For all the slobbering over Sean Miller, we beat his Xavier team last year by 13. Stomped Dana Altman by 32 and Dusty May by 20 last year (and beat his #11 FAU team the year prior). People think highly of Otzelberger. Brad is 4-4 vs Izzo over last 5 seasons. People also like Dennis Gates as a coach (I really don't, personally, but that's irrelevant here), he is 2-1 vs him. Painter has kicked our butts sans last year and we are 0-2 vs Hurley and 0-2 vs Rick Barnes (just noting these, hurts my argument but I'm trying to be fair here).

All these samples are VERY small, so grains of salt and all of that.

I just disagree that we shoot 6-29 on mostly wide open shots and this means coaching is subpar.

As many have already said, its kind of hard to get in the paint when teams sag on you... its why we just have to make shots, Brad can't do that. He can recruit different players, I suppose, but that also has nothing to do with scheme or in-game coaching. Even if you run a completely different system, you still have to make shots.
You make fair points, and I think the reality is there is blame to go on both directions. Some of those games you mentioned we won were nights we just actually made shots.

Aside from X’s and O’s, part of being a good coach is developing your players and from a shooting perspective that has not been something this staff has figured out.

If teams sag off on you, get to the elbow, drive and draw a defender…or run a set play!

I mean I just want to see one game where something isn’t working and we make a clear adjustment at half that turns the game around, not just something like we start making shots. My frustrations only comes from a point of feeling like we are in a golden era and I want us to get another FF appearance before it all falls apart again and we have another decade + of misery
 
Last edited:
#499      
This - I said it during the game thread…the game plan and results were just so predictable and we didn’t try to make any adjustments
 
#500      
Beating a dead horse (maybe maybe not, but not gonna weed through all the bs complaints in here). We played terrible. But if not for a blown shot clock call we are within 7 with plenty of time. All while play terrible. We are effin good. Period. Gel and get guys healthy. We run to final 4
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back