So, playing devil's advocate here, generally there is a relationship between the media and the coaches. And sometimes they'll table stuff they hear on a hot mic because they're asked to. I can understand an AD or coach getting pissed the media member wouldn't come to them or give them a heads up first before posting. Maybe they'd ask him to modify it to "Hurley was irate at the level of officiating" or something of the like. While the reporter of course is under no obligation to do that, often you might to keep a strong and more open relationship. Threatening the guy's livelihood is idiotic from the AD though. Even if there's only anger and frustration with no intent there that's still at the very least a suspension due to lack of common sense."The lasting image of coach Hurley leaving the court should have been his walking off the court arm-in-arm with his seniors, overwhelmed with emotion. Instead, a reporter who was in an area he should not have been, recorded on his cell phone private comments made to members of another coaching staff."
private. in a hallway. 5 feet from the arena opening. with multiple reporters and arena staff present. right.
Hurley's a dbag, no surprise here. Mullen should be canned, freedom of the press and no expectation of privacy in that moment
Yet another example of why we are so incredibly lucky having Whitman