Week of 1/20 Games & News Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#231      
1737934637916.png
 
#232      
Updated B1G efficiency metrics:

View attachment 39078

Notes:
- Now we have enough data to effectively order the teams and rely on these EM numbers. Michigan State continues to lead the pack, and have to be considered the favorites at this point.
- Purdue is hanging around, but the home loss to OSU hurts their title chances.
- Illinois is about to play a string of lower-half teams after tomorrow, need to pile up some wins to justify their overall good efficiency numbers.
- There are 6 teams clear of the field at this point, with USC still hanging around and building a tournament resume.
- Oregon has been a weird team this year, losing 3 home games and winning 4 road games.
- Ohio State and Northwestern are probably right near the NCAA tournament cut line at this point, so 11 B1G teams are tournament quality at this point.
- Indiana is a paper tiger, and should continue to fade now that they're actually playing good teams.
- PSU and Iowa have taken some bad losses to torpedo their tournament chances.
- Rutgers is still nowhere near a tournament team. However, they are at least giving themselves a chance to make the B1G tournament
- Nebraska is currently playing themselves out of what used to be a safe tournament spot. Another home loss tonight hurts a ton.
- Minnesota is currently not the worst team in conference! Still is a terrible loss to lose to them.
- Washington bringing up the rear here, and both Minnesota and Washington are still the favorites to miss the B1G tournament.
Washington got Kepnang back for UCLA and almost got them at home. He gives them a second big to go with Osobor, and to my eye he is a legitimate big on defense and rebounding especially. We are lucky we got UW without him playing.

It might not matter but UW is way better with Kepnang playing for the first time since December. Whether it’s enough remains to be seen.
 
#237      
All b1g teams in top 99 in net
Minny 96 (nice 3 game winning streak)
Washington 99
 
#238      
Badgers 17/37 from 3 today.
Good point. I have been obsessing about shooting percentages for months now, wondering why it seems that some teams have chronically higher shooting precentages from three-point range than do others.

Better shooters, right? But is that the whole story? Do some coaches: create an atmosphere where shooters are more comfortable? Offensive schemes that provide three-point shots that are more open and less challenged? Better teach shooters how to quickly (at game speed) identify good threes from less good ones?

I am expressing my bewilderment at our many years of recruiting more and better shooters to the point that we now lead the 18-team B1G in 3-pointers taken by a huge margin and yet are next to last (in the conference) in shooting percentage from that range.
 
#239      
Illini nation is going to not be happy seeing him win it all. And there’s a too great chance he does.
Talk to me after they actually win a game where they have to play basketball instead of just assaulting people on defense. Hasn't happened yet, as the one game where they actually had to play (Duke) they lost.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back