For as middling as Ben has been, I don't know that Goode would've been better had he stayed.Indiana 8-35 from 3!
I struggle with this. Goode learned to play hard here. He knows BU and how to adapt to BU's systems. He's clearly been a leader at IU. Would it have been an upgrade if he had stayed? No clue, but there would not have been the learning curve. I think time will tell in this trade.For as middling as Ben has been, I don't know that Goode would've been better had he stayed.
As bad as Ben has been, I’m glad he replaced Goode. Ben is so much better in every way.For as middling as Ben has been, I don't know that Goode would've been better had he stayed.
Agree. I actually think Ben will get better. Needs to retool his game a little but the length is thereFor as middling as Ben has been, I don't know that Goode would've been better had he stayed.
Pre-season rankings were based on talent, and on paper, they are the most talented team in the Big Ten.Indiana does not scare me at all. Talk about a team that was overrated pre-season.
IMO you can't turn Illinois away in that department either...Pre-season rankings were based on talent, and on paper, they are the most talented team in the Big Ten
Seems like Luke has greater hand strength. I feel like he might even fare better in an Over-the-Top-style arm wrestling match. Advantage Goode. I award 5 points.For as middling as Ben has been, I don't know that Goode would've been better had he stayed.
I don’t know if shooting 23% from 3 or a Mike Woodson team shooting 35 3s is more surprising.Indiana 8-35 from 3!
Woof... rough last few minutes for Indiana... ends out at a 17 pt loss.
Excellent!Seems like Luke has greater hand strength. I feel like he might even fare better in an Over-the-Top-style arm wrestling match. Advantage Goode. I award 5 points.️
Ben has a high, quick release point. He can shoot floaters and slightly off-balance- not perfectly squared up leaners. He can damn near get his shot off against anyone.
Luke is more of a true spot-up guy that needs to be set. (Luke would sometimes end up taking a worse shot than he initially had…because of his slow release.)
Ben has the shanks right now. But release and mechanics-wise it’s Hum by a country mile. I award 20 points to Ben.
Both are good guys. Luke tends to be more vocal. Personally, I like when Luke gets loud and mouthy. I award 3.5 points to Goode for the slight edge in leadership and Big10 experience.
Ben is 85.9 % more likely than Goode to take it to the rim and end up with some sort of favorable outcome. Big Ben gets Another 20.
Luke has the better haircut.
Goode gets 5 points.️
They both have really fun names. That lend themselves to even better monikers. Luke’s is Goode. But Ben’s name is WAY cooler. 5 points
Ben has a better offensive repertoire with his back to the basket. This one also goes to Ben by a wide margin. 15 points
* Both have high basketball IQs…it’s a DRAW…on this one…
Versatility on both sides of the ball. Ben-15 points
Both are acceptable/decent passers. But with his greater offensive vocabulary…Ben is 88.3471% more likely to be the better (potential) playmaker. I also feel more confident with him inbounding the ball than I do Luke. 10 points goes to BH.
Luke transferred to the wrong Bloomington in the wrong state. He now wears gawdy, candy cane, clownpaints. Deduct 275 points.
BenWins!!
He played well down the stretch to tie it and send to overtimeNot the biggest Hardaway fan, but it's impossible not to root for dain...