SuperMetroid
- Evanston
SIU-Edwardsville punches the first ticket to the big dance. First time in the tournament for the Cougars. SEMO went 3-24 from three 
USC is at their best when Claude is getting to the paint going downhill. Which is what we chose to let happen with our defensive scheme at that time. We deserved that loss. Drop back coverage and trailing the cutter is the worst possible defense we can attempt to employ. Hopefully Hamer will be gone after this season or back to the video room.Yet a lot of good teams lose to bad teams. At home.
We beat a lot of good teams at home, on the road, on a neutral court.
Their game against Alabama was one of the best of the year.. imo Houston is in the class of Duke & Auburn as the real title favorites, Florida right behind.. then some separation⊠and a group of Alabama, Tennessee, MSU, St Johnâs, ISU & Tech as âdark horsesâ and wouldnât be shocked if they won it, but none of them would be the âbest teamâ even if they won the title imo. After that, high end talent & a crazy run could find a select few of teams like Purdue, us, Memphis, A&M, Arizona, Marquette,Kansas (Kentucky would have made this but injury bug)Houston plays every minute like theyâre down 2. The intensity is impressive on the defensive end. Iâm not as impressed with their offense though. For being pretty efficient, I think theyâll have trouble against a team that gets hot from 3. Just my take after only watching a couple of their games. I think theyâll have trouble if they run into an SEC team.
I'm okay with a strategy like this. If teams are going to sit back and play zone on you, why try and play offense if someone isn't going to come out and try to defend.
I think Illinois does have it, but only in certain events like holiday tournaments. Unless I'm mistaken, I think it is going to be in full use in the next couple years.
The National high school federation allows states to implement a shot clock. Iowa has one at 35 seconds for three years now. Illinois has chosen to not use it.
I hate this. IHSA needs a shot clock. I donât care if it worked, that isnât basketball. That isnât competitive. I remember when Richwoods did that against Simeon in 06. Get to see DRose in a championship all for it to end 31-29. If you get rinsed you get rinsed, at least play the game.This would belong in an IHSA Basketball Thread if we have one:
Apparently a playoff game between Eastland and Pecatonica went viral on TwitterX for an interesting coaching strategy...
Will Georgetown even make the Vegas Crown event, or will they be relegated to the NIT?Ed,
Georgetown loses it's SECOND game to DePaul this year. Nice season.
Love,
Fan of a Bull**** University
I hate this. IHSA needs a shot clock. I donât care if it worked, that isnât basketball. That isnât competitive.
The game is supposed to be continuous action in theory. I get what youâre saying, but anything that promotes the continuous nature of the game is something I support.Is it any more competitive for a squad to just sit back in zone and not have any of their defenders come out and effectively defend the players on offense?
People can hate it all they want but if the defense doesn't come out and man up and defend (you can still do this even in zone), then the offense has no incentive to run anything.
The game is supposed to be continuous action in theory. I get what youâre saying, but anything that promotes the continuous nature of the game is something I support.
Itâs why we have play clocks in football, pitch clocks in baseball, etc.
You diagnose what zone they are in and go into appropriate zone offense and solve the puzzle.Is it any more competitive for a squad to just sit back in zone and not have any of their defenders come out and effectively defend the players on offense?
People can hate it all they want but if the defense doesn't come out and man up and defend (you can still do this even in zone), then the offense has no incentive to run anything.
You diagnose what zone they are in and go into appropriate zone offense and solve the puzzle.
Right but why do anything if all the defenders are inside the arc? Where's the incentive to run anything on offense?
The defense's job is to prevent the opponent from scoring. The offense's job is to score the ball. So at the end of the day it comes down to one question. What is more of a true basketball strategy. Playing zone or holding the ball for an entire quarter? To me playing zone is a legitimate strategy to prevent teams from scoring. Holding the ball at midcourt does not help your offense score the ball and is not a legitimate basketball strategy.
But if you're playing an offensive style that limits the number of possessions in general anyway, you'll be more than willing to hold the ball if the defense is not going to defend you man-on-man (even if it's just one guy defending the ball handler) and just sit back in zone.
But that's not true. That's why it's controversial. A lot of coaches do not agree with holding the ball for extended periods because they don't think it's part of the spirit of the game. It's not what friends, family, fans filled the gym to see. It's not what players play for. It's not basketball. A defense can play whatever defense it wants. The offense is supposed to figure out how to score against it. If you want to be patient, that's fine. But still pass, cut, move, until you find a high percentage shot.