I prefer "realistic, pragmatic, observent" to "doom and gloom." But, anyway, I'll take the bait.
Let me ask you, what have you seen over the past month - the most important part of the season - that leads you to think we are destined for a sustained run in the toughest tournament of the season filled with close games, tough individual players that are hard to guard; along with the fact that we have not had real success in it in the past 20 years minus one season with one of the best pure athletes ever to wear an Illini uniform? How long, in this environment of college sports with the amount of money being invested, do you stick with something that is continually contributing to the ongoing frustration of a fanbase that has been one of the most loyal, supporting fanbases in all of the sport when you regularly have the tallest, one of the most talented rosters, etc, etc in all of basketball? How long are you willing to accept the continual dismissal by most of those who follow the sport when discussing the best of the best?
Thanks for eloquently stating the view point some of us “doom and gloomers.”
It’s 100% what you said along with the inability to adjust. No BLOBS/SLOBS. No plans for situational basketball. Bad defense. The “hunt match-ups” and analytical stuff is good unfortunately, but not an acceptable winning formula alone. Our offense is a chunk it offense based off top PnR and really nothing else. There is no imagination. No toughness, no heart.
When things need coaching and changes to be made they aren’t. Either the staff can’t or won’t and that is what needs to be answered. That causes us fans who don’t see and agree with what is being pumped out or portrayed by some on here to have a different perspective which is rightful by both/all sides w/o being talked to like we’re not good fans just bc we disagree.
We have obviously had offensive drought issues in the preseason when we played Florida and we’ve seen it in most games this season….we saw it two years ago against UCONN and still no designed or play calls to get easy two point baskets but rely on our proclaimed good shooters.
When I saw the pic of Underwood and the Balkans in the track suits I had visions of imported inner-city toughness and physicality. The talk of we have the Visics is more like we have the B****es. And I don’t believe that’s representative of their true personalities, but what is learned that you conform with the staff’s style and don’t rock to boat or you won’t play. What I’ve seen is if you rock the boat and challenge things like you have your own brain and have been coached different things before then you’ll be in the dog house and on the bench. We’ll hear things like unplayable, wrong fit, etc.
Also the fast break away from the program by good coaches who develop players, recruit tough players, and coaches who are in game savants is still bothersome. The culture of hiring your son and his friend to have
The tough coaching on some players and the coddling of other players is a questionable observation. The loss of those players like DGL, Epps, Hansberry, Morez, White, Dania, Sincere, and almost Ty who had edge and toughness and a different kind of toughness. Also the mystery around guys like Morettti, Perrin, Petrovic is all what makes a staff have to be accountable for.
Even with all that said, I really like Underwood and the hire and always have. Living in Texas, I saw a lot of him when he was at SFA. My wife is an Oklahoma State grad, so we’ve had a transferred-shared love of his tenure at ILL eventhough strong criticism. I also admire the way he and the staff handled and trusted TSJ through the whole ordeal a couple of years ago.
There is a lot to like about the program and a lot to question. Some kind of changes have to be willingly made or forcibly made to change I. Order to be a real NC contender.