|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#176 |
|
Location: Champaign
Posts: 2,572
|
So--just to be clear, mattcoldagelli, illinicb, and Illini87InClt-- you're OK with hearing the following in a couple years: "Welcome to Big Ten football; today's key conference matchup is between the Iowa Hawkeyes and Maryland Terrapins!"
|
|
|
#177 | |
|
Location: Kelso, WA
Posts: 1,461
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#178 |
|
Location: Champaign
Posts: 2,572
|
|
|
|
#179 |
|
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 1,453
|
Sure. Why not?
|
|
|
#180 |
|
Posts: 1,475
|
Considering that hearing that means that the school I love was able to build a new research facility with all the money the tv markets brought in, yes I am perfectly fine hearing that.
__________________ Williams to tie it with a three......HE DOES!!! |
|
|
#181 |
|
Location: Swansea, IL
Posts: 3,529
|
Think they could go with a Northeast/Southwest alignment...
Northeast Maryland Michigan Michigan State Northwestern Ohio State Penn State Rutgers Southwest Illinois Indiana Iowa Minnesota Nebraska Purdue Wisconsin However, those divisions aren't very balanced at all, but you wouldn't really need cross-over rivals because most our preserved (aside from Illinois/Northwestern but I don't think people would be too crushed by that). |
|
|
#182 |
|
Location: Hinsdale
Posts: 857
|
the big football conferences seem set on going up to 16. to do so, the B1G is going to go after large TV markets. NY/NJ, DC/Balt, Atlanta and Charlotte are all pretty obvious choices.
|
|
|
#183 |
|
Location: Kelso, WA
Posts: 1,461
|
|
|
|
#184 |
|
Posts: 406
|
I'm OK with that. I might not watch it on television because I'm not a fan of either team, but I am ok with the match-up. It's not much different than some of the current match-ups (Minnesota vs. Indiana, Indiana vs. Purdue). While I might not be tuned into the game, that doesn't mean that the Iowa and Maryland fans will not be watching.
|
|
|
#185 |
|
Posts: 406
|
The rumored pickups would help with the NY/NJ and DC/Balt. To get attention in Charlotte, the B1G would pretty much have to land UNC as the city has a strong slant toward the Heels.
|
|
|
#186 |
|
Coffee is for closers!
Location: Elmhurst
Posts: 991
|
Conference realignment is about money, money, money (e.g. BTN) and being able to control one's destiny. Once the ND ship sailed, the BIG felt it needed to make a move. Delany is an empire builder. The BIG is gonna become the Borg, like it or not (ESPN can suck it, LOL). Maryland and Rutgers are not the end game.
|
|
|
#187 |
|
Posts: 1,475
|
The PAC-12 secured one of the most lucrative tv deals ever after this expansion. So yeah, I would say it "worked out well".
Stop looking at this from a fan's view and start looking at it from a school president's view. The extra tv money can do wonders for a school. Bigger conferences are great for tv deals because it leaves tv networks with less options to bid for, therefore bigger contracts. __________________ Williams to tie it with a three......HE DOES!!! |
|
|
#188 | |
|
Location: Kelso, WA
Posts: 1,461
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#189 | |
|
Posts: 885
|
Sorry if this link has already been posted, but it really is fascinating that the B1G has the potential to pluck a charter member from the ACC. As for the quote, this is in regards to ND moving to the ACC.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#190 |
|
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,960
|
OSU, PSU, and Michigan all play lacrosse. Maryland would make four (does anyone know if Rutgers has a team, too?). Lacrosse, while gaining traction, still isn't a huge, national sport. That's not going to change regardless of the conference they join. It'll be like the B1G hockey schools: they'll look elsewhere to schedule lacrosse games until the rest of the conference catches up.
|
|
|
#191 | |
|
Admin
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 25,894
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#192 |
|
Location: Christian County, IL
Posts: 145
|
Maybe we could have two divisions called the Bjorn and the Trekkie. :laugh:
__________________ Gotta go to the bathroom . . . I drank too much orange kool-aid. :laugh: |
|
|
#193 | |
|
Coffee is for closers!
Location: Elmhurst
Posts: 991
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#194 | |
|
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,960
|
Quote:
Not saying it happens because Maryland comes into the B1G, but I wouldn't be surprised to see it become a serious point of interest among non-revenue sports in the next 20 years or so. |
|
|
|
#195 |
|
Posts: 885
|
Considering the Northwestern women's lacrosse team has won 7 NCAA championships recently, I think that it would be premature to think that Maryland would have to operate as a pseudo-independent.
|
|
|
#196 | |
|
Coffee is for closers!
Location: Elmhurst
Posts: 991
|
Quote:
I think 20 years is a reasonable estimate for fielding at least 11-12 conference teams. As Title IX (in concert w/85 football rides) is a huge obstacle to non-revenue mens sports, lacrosse will probably get more traction as a women's sport initially. |
|
|
|
#197 |
|
Coffee is for closers!
Location: Elmhurst
Posts: 991
|
Sorry, should have made it clear that I was thinking of men's lacrosse.
|
|
|
#198 |
|
Location: Champaign
Posts: 2,572
|
|
|
|
#199 |
|
Location: Champaign
Posts: 2,572
|
I've said this once before, but I'd like to make sure that everyone hears this loud and clear: can we STOP talking about how Maryland is a good or bad addition to the B1G when only referencing their current record in a sport? So what if the Terps stink at football right now? By the time 2017 rolls around, they may be competing for a conference title. No need to read into the Maryland/B1G discussion by bringing up their record in a sport.
|
|
|
#200 |
|
Location: Northbrook
Posts: 5,755
|
No. If it is a key matchup, that means Iowa is good and I HATE when IOWA is good.
__________________ "I could care less" does not mean the same as "I couldn't care less" |
|
|