Go Back   Fighting Illini Forums > Sports > Fighting Illini Football

ESPN's B1G Position Rankings

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 14, 2012, 08:02 AM   #1
AHSIllini32
Posts: 7,076
Offense:

QB Units: Illinois #7

RB Units: Illinois #9

WR/TE Units: Illinois #10

OL Units: Illinois #10

Defense:

DL Units: Illinois #5

LB Units: Illinois #6

DB Units: Illinois #6

Couple of thoughts:
- It's obvious, as we have all been saying, that ESPN thinks our D will be our strength.

- That said I think our QB and WR/TE should be higher. We have some good depth at QB and while we lack playmakers at WR, our TE's are pretty darn talented.

- Defensively I think all of our units need to be higher. There are not 5 better DL units or DB units in the conference than ours. And while the LB's are a bit unknown outside of Brown there's actually a fair bit of experience to go along with talent.
AHSIllini32 is offline Reply With Quote
Old Aug 14, 2012, 08:24 AM   #2
quhawks12
Location: Hamilton County, IN
Posts: 3,383
1st on QB's they are drunk having Purdue #1. They are basically saying that since they have 3 average guys who have all started they are ranked #1. We should be at 6 ahead of Minny b/c of what Nate has done taking us to 2 straight bowl wins.

I understand the RB, WR and OL rankings. We have talent there but not much substance so far.

DL we should be 3 or 4. With the lack of depth I understand the #5 ranking though.

LB and DB is about right. Either could move up a spot or 2 depending on how you look at some of the players.
quhawks12 is offline Reply With Quote
Old Aug 14, 2012, 08:37 AM   #3
AHSIllini32
Posts: 7,076
I'm glad you mentioned the PU QB ranking I completely forgot about that.

I guess that shows how seriously we should take these rankings.
AHSIllini32 is offline Reply With Quote
Old Aug 14, 2012, 08:42 AM   #4
CaptainHindsight
Location: Champaign
Posts: 304
You cannot take anything the ESPN B1G blog writes seriously. Everything is a popularity contest there.
CaptainHindsight is online now Reply With Quote
Old Aug 14, 2012, 08:44 AM   #5
quhawks12
Location: Hamilton County, IN
Posts: 3,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainHindsight View Post
You cannot take anything the ESPN B1G blog writes seriously. Everything is a popularity contest there.
Not sure it was a popularity contest...at least with the QB position. He's the only person in the world who thinks Purdue is #1 in B1G for QB's.
quhawks12 is offline Reply With Quote
Old Aug 14, 2012, 08:53 AM   #6
AHSIllini32
Posts: 7,076
Yeah, any of these position rankings need to be taken with a grain of salt but it's just interesting to see where people think we are. Looking at these rankings though and if you would equate it out to a record I would think that would come out to about 5-6 wins if our units finish in those spots.

The average unit ranking comes out to 7.6 so rounding up takes us to 8th place in the B1G
AHSIllini32 is offline Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2012, 07:39 PM   #7
AHSIllini32
Posts: 7,076
ESPN: Preseason team rankings based on individual unit rankings

Quote:
9. Illinois -- 65 points

(High: Defensive line: 5. Low: Special teams: 12)
As we discussed, ESPN seemed to really undervalue us seeing as how, if we finish 9th, it will probably mean no bowl game.
AHSIllini32 is offline Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2012, 09:04 PM   #8
Groundhogday
Groundhogday's Avatar
Posts: 18,220
QB: Very productive and experienced redshirt junior at QB and we are ranked #7. That is much too low. It is a complete joke to put Scheelhaase behind TerBush and MarQueis Gray (!?). I would even put Nate ahead of Martinez and Vandenberg.
RB: Like others, I think we have better RB than this ranking indicates but they need to show it on the field.
WR/TE: Based upon our strength at TE alone, we should be better than #10.
OL: Totally justified until we prove otherwise.

DL: We has the No. 7 defense in the country last year, largely to to a DL that for the most part is returning. This was a low-ball ranking.
LB: I guess I can see this given that Bates and Williams are unproven.
DB: We actually might be ranked a bit high. Yes, Hawthorne and Green are terrific athletes but neither have been the complete package at CB yet heading into their senior year. And there are some pretty serious questions at safety and regarding depth.

__________________
ONLY ORANGE!
Groundhogday is online now Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2012, 10:18 PM   #9
256ILLINI
Banned
Posts: 453
I doubt whoever made that list spent that much time on it. Illinois' DL and LB group are good enough to be top 3
256ILLINI is offline Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2012, 07:03 AM   #10
quhawks12
Location: Hamilton County, IN
Posts: 3,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Groundhogday View Post
QB: Very productive and experienced redshirt junior at QB and we are ranked #7. That is much too low. It is a complete joke to put Scheelhaase behind TerBush and MarQueis Gray (!?). I would even put Nate ahead of Martinez and Vandenberg.
It's a complete joke that Purdue is #1.

It's like the old saying in the NFL when a team says they have 2 QB's they actually have none. Well they have and Hope has said they are going to play 3...
quhawks12 is offline Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Fighting Illini Football | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Forum Jump




Follow IllinoisLoyalty on Twitter

Get Free Daily Email Updates